Gonzalo Barón-Esquivias1, Antonio J Díaz Martín2, Álvaro Marco Del Castillo3, Macarena Quintanilla2, Carmen Barón-Solís2, Carlos A Morillo4. 1. Cardiology Department, Virgen del Rocio University Hospital, Seville University, Spain. Electronic address: gonzalo.baron.sspa@juntadeandalucia.es. 2. Cardiology Department, Virgen del Rocio University Hospital, Seville University, Spain. 3. Cardiology Department, University Hospital Ramon y Cajal, Madrid, Spain. 4. Department of Cardiac Sciences, Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta, University of Calgary and Population Health Research Institute-McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: carlos.morillo@ucalgary.ca.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The European Syncope Guidelines (ESG) recommend the use of Head-up tilt test (HUT) in case of suspicion of vasovagal syncope (VVS) or orthostatic hypotensive syncope (OHS) after an adequate initial inconclusive evaluation. We report a single center experience in the scenario of suspected VVS or OHS, who underwent HUT in patients referred to a Syncope Clinic after ruling out high-risk causes. METHODS: We prospectively and consecutively included all syncopal patients that were referred for HUT, by their attending physician after performing a series of diagnostic tests to rule out cardiac etiology. The clinical history and diagnostic tests performed were reviewed prior to HUT. Patients were pre-classified according to the recommendations from the ESG as; VVS, OHS or Syncope of Unknown Etiology (SUE). RESULTS: We studied 1058 patients, 558 (52.7%) males, mean age 46.5 ± 20.1 yr. There were no gender differences in age, risk factors, previous heart diseases, ECG findings or number of previous tests. Based on the ESG criteria a significant number of diagnostic tests were probably unnecessarily performed. HUT was positive in 609 patients (57.5%). The rate of positive HUT according to pre-classification was significantly different among groups: 60% VVS, 46.1% OHS and 54.3% SUE (p = 0.037). Combining ESG recommendations and HUT results of the 1058 resulted in 762 (72%) diagnosed as VVS, 89 (8.4%) as OHS and 207 (19.5%) as SUE. CONCLUSIONS: Appropriate application of ESG recommendations combined with HUT, identified 81% of patients with non-cardiogenic syncope, potentially avoiding a significant number of unnecessary diagnostic tests.
BACKGROUND: The European Syncope Guidelines (ESG) recommend the use of Head-up tilt test (HUT) in case of suspicion of vasovagal syncope (VVS) or orthostatic hypotensive syncope (OHS) after an adequate initial inconclusive evaluation. We report a single center experience in the scenario of suspected VVS or OHS, who underwent HUT in patients referred to a Syncope Clinic after ruling out high-risk causes. METHODS: We prospectively and consecutively included all syncopalpatients that were referred for HUT, by their attending physician after performing a series of diagnostic tests to rule out cardiac etiology. The clinical history and diagnostic tests performed were reviewed prior to HUT. Patients were pre-classified according to the recommendations from the ESG as; VVS, OHS or Syncope of Unknown Etiology (SUE). RESULTS: We studied 1058 patients, 558 (52.7%) males, mean age 46.5 ± 20.1 yr. There were no gender differences in age, risk factors, previous heart diseases, ECG findings or number of previous tests. Based on the ESG criteria a significant number of diagnostic tests were probably unnecessarily performed. HUT was positive in 609 patients (57.5%). The rate of positive HUT according to pre-classification was significantly different among groups: 60% VVS, 46.1% OHS and 54.3% SUE (p = 0.037). Combining ESG recommendations and HUT results of the 1058 resulted in 762 (72%) diagnosed as VVS, 89 (8.4%) as OHS and 207 (19.5%) as SUE. CONCLUSIONS: Appropriate application of ESG recommendations combined with HUT, identified 81% of patients with non-cardiogenic syncope, potentially avoiding a significant number of unnecessary diagnostic tests.