Literature DB >> 33075188

Breast Cancer-Specific Mortality in Small-Sized Tumor with Stage IV Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Study.

Yi-Zi Zheng1,2, Xian-Ming Wang1, Lei Fan2, Zhi-Ming Shao2,3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Small-sized primary tumor does not always indicate a better prognosis. We hypothesized that very small primary breast tumors with extensive lymph node (LN) metastases represented an aggressive biologic behavior in stage IV disease.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data between 2010 and 2015 were retrieved retrospectively from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database with inclusion criteria of female sex, unilateral, metastatic, and T1/2 invasive ductal carcinoma. Primary study variables included T stage, N stage, grade, metastatic sites, number of involved sites, estrogen receptor status, progesterone receptor status, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status. Kaplan-Meier and adjusted Cox proportional hazards models with interaction terms were used. One-, 2- and 3-year breast cancer-specific mortality (BCSM) was examined according to tumor size.
RESULTS: We identified 5,340 eligible patients with breast cancer. In multivariate analysis, race, age, grade, molecular subtype, surgery, brain metastases, and liver metastases were found to be independently associated with BCSM. For T1 tumors, the N0, N1, and N2+ groups had the same BCSM. In tumors smaller than 50 mm, the 1-, 2-, and 3-year BCSM did not decline with the decrease of tumor size. For triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs), the T1a/T1bN2+ group had significantly worse BCSM than any other group did.
CONCLUSION: Patients with stage IV cancer with small-sized tumors may have BCSM as high as those with larger tumors. In TNBCs, very small tumors with severe LN involvement are associated with the worst BCSM. Continued efforts are needed to further investigate Ta1/T1bN2 + M1 TNBCs and individualize the treatment for affected patients. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This study revealed that for stage IV breast cancer, smaller primary tumors were not always associated with better breast cancer-specific mortality. This study illustrated that very small triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) with extensive regional lymph node involvement may be a surrogate for biologically aggressive disease. Because of poor prognosis of T1a/T1bN2+ TNBCs, there might be an urgent need of more individualized treatment for affected patients. Future correlative studies ought to focus on the genetic and molecular differences in Ta1/T1bN2+ TNBCs that contribute to the biological behavior. Clarification of the regulation mechanism of very small-sized primary TNBCs with metastatic outgrowth in nodes and distant sites will play an integral role in developing targeted therapies. © AlphaMed Press 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Breast cancer-specific mortality; Stage IV; Tumor size

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33075188      PMCID: PMC7873341          DOI: 10.1002/onco.13567

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159            Impact factor:   5.837


  27 in total

1.  Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications.

Authors:  T Sørlie; C M Perou; R Tibshirani; T Aas; S Geisler; H Johnsen; T Hastie; M B Eisen; M van de Rijn; S S Jeffrey; T Thorsen; H Quist; J C Matese; P O Brown; D Botstein; P E Lønning; A L Børresen-Dale
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-09-11       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Survival differences among women with de novo stage IV and relapsed breast cancer.

Authors:  S Dawood; K Broglio; J Ensor; G N Hortobagyi; S H Giordano
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  Effect of very small tumor size on cancer-specific mortality in node-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer Y Wo; Kun Chen; Bridget A Neville; Nancy U Lin; Rinaa S Punglia
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Subdivision of M1 Stage for De Novo Metastatic Breast Cancer to Better Predict Prognosis and Response to Primary Tumor Surgery.

Authors:  Caijin Lin; Jiayi Wu; Shuning Ding; Chihwan Goh; Lisa Andriani; Shuangshuang Lu; Kunwei Shen; Li Zhu
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 11.908

Review 5.  Breast cancer metastasis: markers and models.

Authors:  Britta Weigelt; Johannes L Peterse; Laura J van 't Veer
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 60.716

6.  Molecular portraits of human breast tumours.

Authors:  C M Perou; T Sørlie; M B Eisen; M van de Rijn; S S Jeffrey; C A Rees; J R Pollack; D T Ross; H Johnsen; L A Akslen; O Fluge; A Pergamenschikov; C Williams; S X Zhu; P E Lønning; A L Børresen-Dale; P O Brown; D Botstein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-08-17       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 7.  Tumor size and survival in breast cancer--a reappraisal.

Authors:  William D Foulkes; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Steven A Narod
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 66.675

8.  Systemic spread is an early step in breast cancer.

Authors:  Yves Hüsemann; Jochen B Geigl; Falk Schubert; Piero Musiani; Manfred Meyer; Elke Burghart; Guido Forni; Roland Eils; Tanja Fehm; Gert Riethmüller; Christoph A Klein
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 31.743

9.  The pathogenesis of cancer metastasis: the 'seed and soil' hypothesis revisited.

Authors:  Isaiah J Fidler
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 60.716

10.  The Clinicopathological features and survival outcomes of patients with different metastatic sites in stage IV breast cancer.

Authors:  Ru Wang; Yayun Zhu; Xiaoxu Liu; Xiaoqin Liao; Jianjun He; Ligang Niu
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  1 in total

1.  Prognostic Factors and a Nomogram Predicting Survival in Patients with Breast Ductal Carcinoma in situ with Microinvasion: A Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Yi-Zi Zheng; Hong-Bin Qin; Zi-Zheng Li; He-Sheng Jiang; Greg Zhang; Shi-Wei Yang; Xian-Ming Wang; Yang-Chun Xu; Zhen-Han Deng; Guo-Wen Liu
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 4.790

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.