Rujapak Sutiwisesak1,2, Nathan D Hicks3, Shayla Boyce2, Kenan C Murphy1,2, Kadamba Papavinasasundaram2, Stephen M Carpenter2, Julie Boucau4, Neelambari Joshi4, Sylvie Le Gall4, Sarah M Fortune3, Christopher M Sassetti1,2, Samuel M Behar1,2. 1. Immunology and Microbiology Program, Graduate School of Biomedical Science, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States of America. 2. Department of Microbiology and Physiological Systems, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States of America. 3. Department of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America. 4. Ragon Institute of Massachusetts General Hospital, Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.
Abstract
CD8 T cells provide limited protection against Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) infection in the mouse model. As Mtb causes chronic infection in mice and humans, we hypothesize that Mtb impairs T cell responses as an immune evasion strategy. TB10.4 is an immunodominant antigen in people, nonhuman primates, and mice, which is encoded by the esxH gene. In C57BL/6 mice, 30-50% of pulmonary CD8 T cells recognize the TB10.44-11 epitope. However, TB10.4-specific CD8 T cells fail to recognize Mtb-infected macrophages. We speculate that Mtb elicits immunodominant CD8 T cell responses to antigens that are inefficiently presented by infected cells, thereby focusing CD8 T cells on nonprotective antigens. Here, we leverage naturally occurring polymorphisms in esxH, which frequently occur in lineage 1 strains, to test this "decoy hypothesis". Using the clinical isolate 667, which contains an EsxHA10T polymorphism, we observe a drastic change in the hierarchy of CD8 T cells. Using isogenic Erd.EsxHA10T and Erd.EsxHWT strains, we prove that this polymorphism alters the hierarchy of immunodominant CD8 T cell responses. Our data are best explained by immunodomination, a mechanism by which competition for APC leads to dominant responses suppressing subdominant responses. These results were surprising as the variant epitope can bind to H2-Kb and is recognized by TB10.4-specific CD8 T cells. The dramatic change in TB10.4-specific CD8 responses resulted from increased proteolytic degradation of A10T variant, which destroyed the TB10.44-11epitope. Importantly, this polymorphism affected T cell priming and recognition of infected cells. These data support a model in which nonprotective CD8 T cells become immunodominant and suppress subdominant responses. Thus, polymorphisms between clinical Mtb strains, and BCG or H37Rv sequence-based vaccines could lead to a mismatch between T cells that are primed by vaccines and the epitopes presented by infected cells. Reprograming host immune responses should be considered in the future design of vaccines.
CD8 T cells provide limited protection against Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) infection in the mouse model. As Mtb causes chronic infection in mice and humans, we hypothesize that Mtb impairs T cell responses as an immune evasion strategy. TB10.4 is an immunodominant antigen in people, nonhuman primates, and mice, which is encoded by the esxH gene. In C57BL/6 mice, 30-50% of pulmonary CD8 T cells recognize the TB10.44-11 epitope. However, TB10.4-specific CD8 T cells fail to recognize Mtb-infected macrophages. We speculate that Mtb elicits immunodominant CD8 T cell responses to antigens that are inefficiently presented by infected cells, thereby focusing CD8 T cells on nonprotective antigens. Here, we leverage naturally occurring polymorphisms in esxH, which frequently occur in lineage 1 strains, to test this "decoy hypothesis". Using the clinical isolate 667, which contains an EsxHA10T polymorphism, we observe a drastic change in the hierarchy of CD8 T cells. Using isogenic Erd.EsxHA10T and Erd.EsxHWT strains, we prove that this polymorphism alters the hierarchy of immunodominant CD8 T cell responses. Our data are best explained by immunodomination, a mechanism by which competition for APC leads to dominant responses suppressing subdominant responses. These results were surprising as the variant epitope can bind to H2-Kb and is recognized by TB10.4-specific CD8 T cells. The dramatic change in TB10.4-specific CD8 responses resulted from increased proteolytic degradation of A10T variant, which destroyed the TB10.44-11epitope. Importantly, this polymorphism affected T cell priming and recognition of infected cells. These data support a model in which nonprotective CD8 T cells become immunodominant and suppress subdominant responses. Thus, polymorphisms between clinical Mtb strains, and BCG or H37Rv sequence-based vaccines could lead to a mismatch between T cells that are primed by vaccines and the epitopes presented by infected cells. Reprograming host immune responses should be considered in the future design of vaccines.
Tuberculosis (TB), a disease caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis
(Mtb), is the leading cause of death from an infectious disease [1]. Mtb infects myeloid cells,
largely evades humoral immunity and persists intracellularly by inhibiting vesicular
trafficking and phagolysosome fusion [2]. The protective role of CD4 T cells is a
reflection of bacillary occupation of the phagosome as Mtb protein antigens in the
vacuolar compartment are processed and sampled by class II MHC. While CD8 T cells
predominantly recognize peptides generated in the cytosol and sampled by class I
MHC, vacuolar antigens can enter the class I MHC pathway through a process called
cross-presentation [3].
Robust CD8 T cell responses are generated when uninfected DC cross-present Mtb
antigens that are acquired by the uptake of apoptotic vesicles or exosomes derived
from infected cells [4].
However, the role of CD8 T cells in host protection is controversial. On the one
hand, CD8 T cells confer far less protection than CD4 T cells in the murine aerosol
TB model [5]. Yet, recent
data from the NHP TB model indicates that CD8 T cell responses correlate with
protection elicited by vaccination [6-8]. The ability
to improve vaccine efficacy by targeting CD8 T cells would be an important advance.
In the mouse model, CD8 T cells make only a modest contribution to protective
immunity despite a robust immune response (see below). To understand why protection
mediated by CD8 T cells is suboptimal in the mouse model, we have advanced the
hypothesis that some immunodominant Mtb antigens act as decoys by eliciting CD8 T
cell responses that inefficiently recognize infected cells [9]. Understanding the mechanisms that interfere
with CD8-mediated protection could provide new strategies for the development of
protective vaccines.EsxH is an essential gene that is part of the ESX3 type VII
secretion system [10]. The
esxH gene encodes the protein TB10.4, which elicits both CD4
and CD8 T cell responses in human and mice, and has been incorporated into vaccines
undergoing clinical trials (e.g., AERAS-402) [11]. After Mtb aerosol infection of C57BL/6J
mice, 30–50% of pulmonary CD8 T cells are specific to the TB10.44−11
epitope [12].
TB10.44−11-specific CD8 T cells mediate protection when transferred
to immunocompromised mice, but TB10.44−11-immunization did not protect
immunocompetent mice against Mtb challenge [13, 14]. Recently, we found that
TB10.44−11-specific CD8 T cells do not recognize Mtb-infected
macrophages, which is difficult to reconcile with the immunodominance of
TB10.4-specific CD8 T cell response [9].Why the CD8 T cell response to TB10.4 is immunodominant is unclear [13]. Immunodominant CD8 T cell
responses are frequently seen after viral infection [15]. One mechanism observed during HIV, CMV and
poxvirus infection, among others, is immunodomination [16-19]. Immunodomination is defined as a dominant
CD8 T cell response which positively reinforces itself by inhibiting CD8 T cell
responses to other sub-dominant epitopes [20, 21]. The inability of immunodominant
TB10.4-specific CD8 T cell response to recognize Mtb-infected macrophages suggests
that this type of response could be an evasion strategy that benefits Mtb. By
stimulating a dominant CD8 T cell response that cannot recognize infected
macrophages, TB10.4 might act as a decoy antigen, and prevent the generation of
other Mtb-specific CD8 T cell responses that could potentially mediate protection,
while at the same time, creating an inflammatory environment that promotes bacterial
transmission.To investigate these questions, we examined the highly polymorphic nature of
esxH, and identified a “hotspot” in the TB10.44−11
epitope, particularly in lineage 1. We leveraged naturally occurring polymorphisms
among clinical isolates to study immunodomination and immune evasion. By using the
clinical isolate 667, which has a polymorphism at the tenth amino acid in the TB10.4
protein (i.e., A10T), we show that the hierarchy of the Mtb-specific CD8 T cell
response is driven by immunodomination. We then considered whether this change in
hierarchy could result from altered presentation of the TB10.44−11
epitope or arise from a change in function of the TB10.4 protein. We prove that the
alteration in immunodominance was due to the variation in esxH by
developing a set of isogenic Erdman strains with the same A10T polymorphism.
Finally, we discovered that the A10T polymorphism changes the processing of the
TB10.44−11 epitope and leads to its accelerated destruction. This
change in the epitope sequence, which does not significantly alter MHC-binding or T
cell recognition, alters the half-life of the epitope and consequently, has profound
effects on CD8 T cell priming and immunodomination.
Results
The TB10.44−11 epitope is a hotspot for polymorphisms in the
esxH gene of Mtb
Numerous human T cell epitopes in the TB10.4 protein, which is encoded by
esxH gene, have been identified from individuals with
diverse HLA haplotypes (Fig
1A). In addition, three immunodominant epitopes have been identified
in C57BL/6 and BALB/c mice (shaded grey, Fig 1A) [12, 22, 23]. As esxH is an
essential gene required for iron homeostasis and virulence, and its deletion
leads to attenuation in vivo [24], it was not feasible to test the “decoy
hypothesis” by esxH deletion. Therefore, we investigated
whether naturally occurring polymorphisms in virulent Mtb strains could be
leveraged to study the how immunodominance affects host immunity.
Fig 1
The esxH gene is highly polymorphic among clinical
Mtb isolates.
(A) Reported TB10.4 epitopes recognized by human T cells from the IEDB
database (www.iedb.org). Y axis represents the length of the 96
amino-acid TB10.4 protein. Each horizontal red bar spans an individual
reported epitope. Grey shaded areas represent mouse TB10.4-specific T
cell epitopes: H2-Kb-restricted TB10.44−11,
H2-Kd-restricted TB10.420−28, and
I-Ad-restricted TB10.474−88. (B) The locations
of EsxH polymorphisms are represented along the linear sequence of the
protein (green), with the number of isolates containing each
polymorphism based on the whole genome sequences from Holt et al and
Walker et al [25,
26]. Regions
of the protein with a high frequency of polymorphisms are shaded grey.
The bar color corresponds to the different Mtb lineages: lineage 1 (L1),
purple; L2, blue; L3, white; and, L4, red. The table shows the total
numbers of polymorphisms in each lineage, and the χ2 and p
values compared to L1. (C) Whole-genome SNP-based phylogenies represent
the polymorphisms across all clinical isolates within lineage 1. Each
circumference line signifies a distinct polymorphism indicated in the
grey box labeled “Lineage 1.” Each red dot cluster represents each time
the indicated polymorphism evolved independently. Red stars designate
the A10V polymorphism which evolve separately three times. The table
shows the acquisition rate of esxH variations based on the
identification of genome-wide SNP events within each phylogeny and the
number of events which were within esxH.
The esxH gene is highly polymorphic among clinical
Mtb isolates.
(A) Reported TB10.4 epitopes recognized by human T cells from the IEDB
database (www.iedb.org). Y axis represents the length of the 96
amino-acid TB10.4 protein. Each horizontal red bar spans an individual
reported epitope. Grey shaded areas represent mouse TB10.4-specific T
cell epitopes: H2-Kb-restricted TB10.44−11,
H2-Kd-restricted TB10.420−28, and
I-Ad-restricted TB10.474−88. (B) The locations
of EsxH polymorphisms are represented along the linear sequence of the
protein (green), with the number of isolates containing each
polymorphism based on the whole genome sequences from Holt et al and
Walker et al [25,
26]. Regions
of the protein with a high frequency of polymorphisms are shaded grey.
The bar color corresponds to the different Mtb lineages: lineage 1 (L1),
purple; L2, blue; L3, white; and, L4, red. The table shows the total
numbers of polymorphisms in each lineage, and the χ2 and p
values compared to L1. (C) Whole-genome SNP-based phylogenies represent
the polymorphisms across all clinical isolates within lineage 1. Each
circumference line signifies a distinct polymorphism indicated in the
grey box labeled “Lineage 1.” Each red dot cluster represents each time
the indicated polymorphism evolved independently. Red stars designate
the A10V polymorphism which evolve separately three times. The table
shows the acquisition rate of esxH variations based on the
identification of genome-wide SNP events within each phylogeny and the
number of events which were within esxH.The frequency of esxH polymorphisms among 3,363
M. tuberculosis clinical isolates from
Holt et al and Walker et al, spanning lineages
1–4 (i.e., L1, L2, L3 and L4), was determined by whole-genome sequencing [25, 26]. A total of 86 isolates contained
non-synonymous polymorphisms in esxH (2.56%), of which the
majority (77 isolates) resulted in amino acids changes between positions N7 and
G13 (Fig 1B, S1 Table).
Clinical isolates with esxH polymorphisms were not randomly
distributed among the four M. tuberculosis
lineages. In particular, 75 of 594 (12.5%) isolates belonging to L1 contained
esxH polymorphism, while the frequency in lineages L2, L3
and L4 were significantly lower with 4 of 1239 (0.32%), 0 of 529 (0%), and 7 of
1001 (0.7%), respectively (two-sided chi-square: L1 vs L2, χ2 =
147.4, p < 0.0001; L1 vs L3, χ2 = 71.57, p < 0.0001; L1 vs L4,
χ2 = 108.7, p < 0.0001).To understand the evolution of esxH variants, we constructed
whole-genome SNP-based phylogenies for each lineage separately (Fig 1C). By mapping the
genome-wide SNP alignment back to the phylogenetic tree, we could identify
55,703 SNP mutation events within the L1 phylogeny, of which 16 were within
esxH. Assuming that each lineage was equally likely to
alter esxH by chance, the number of variations in L1 was
significantly higher than expected when compared with L3 (0 of 32400 mutations,
two-sided chi-square, χ2 = 9.308, p = 0.0023) and L4 (4 of 57937
mutations, two-sided chi-square, χ2 = 7.684, p = 0.0056). The trend
was consistent compared with L2 (4 of 36353 mutations, χ2 = 1.783, p
= 0.075). Overall, these data suggest that L1 isolates are more likely to
acquire esxH polymorphisms compared with the modern L2, L3 and
L4 strains. We further calculated the number of times each SNP within L1 evolved
independently by mapping the esxH variations back on the
phylogeny. Each esxH variant evolved once except for A10V which
evolved 3 times and could be found in one clade of four isolates and two
unrelated isolates (purple stars, Fig 1C). Among the esxH variants, A10T is the most
abundance which were found in 41 isolates. Since all of these clinical strains
were by definition virulent, we elected to study the mechanism and the impact of
the A10T polymorphism on immunodomination and immune evasion.
The clinical isolate 667 and Erdman elicit different hierarchies of
antigen-specific CD8 T cells
To determine whether esxH polymorphisms affect T cell responses
in vivo, we infected C57BL/6J mice with the clinical
isolate 667 [27]. 667 was
selected because it has a single nonsynonymous polymorphism in
esxH that results in the amino acid substitution A10T,
which is the most frequent variation among the clinical isolates. Although it
has ~1,700 SNPs compared to Erdman or the laboratory reference strain H37Rv,
there are no differences among the genes that encode the major antigens ESAT6,
Ag85B, CFP10, and MTB32a, which we use to measure T cell responses in the mouse
tuberculosis model.Following aerosol infection with Erdman, the frequency of antigen-specific T
cells was monitored by flow cytometry using tetramers of peptide-loaded MHC
molecules. When the cells were stained with the
TB10.44−11/Kb tetramer corresponding to the
IMYNYPAM epitope (hereafter referred to as “WT”), 26%
of lung CD8 T cells were specific for TB10.44−11; in contrast, fewer
than 1% of lung CD8 T cells recognized TB10.44−11 after 667 infection
(Fig 2A and 2B). Not
only was the frequency of TB10.44−11-specific CD8 T cells diminished
after 667 infection, but there was also a reduction in the absolute number of
TB10.44−11-specific CD8 T cells, a decrease that persisted during
the course of infection (Fig
2C, S1A Fig). The frequency and number of ESAT6-specific CD4 T cells
elicited by the two bacterial strains was similar (Fig 2B and 2C). Importantly, the frequency
and number of MTB32a309-318-specific CD8 T cells was significantly
greater after 667 infection, relative to Erdman infection (Fig 2A–2C, S1B Fig).
These differences were observed in nine independent paired infections, which
included 96 individually analyzed mice (Fig 2D). Antigen-specific CD8 T cells
expressed high levels of KLRG1 and low levels of CD127, independently of the
bacterial strain, which was consistent with an effector cell phenotype (S1C
Fig).
Fig 2
The hierarchy of immunodominant CD8 T cell responses after Erdman vs.
667 infection.
Lung T cell responses were evaluated five weeks after infection of
C57BL/6J mice with ~100 aerosolized Erdman or 667 bacilli. (A)
Representative flow cytometry plots of MTB32a309-318 and
TB10.44−11 tetramer staining of pulmonary CD8 T cells
from Erdman- or 667-infected C57BL/6J mice. The frequency (B) or
absolute number (C) of TB10.4- or MTB32a-specific CD8, or ESAT6-specific
CD4 T cells in the lungs of infected mice after Erdman or 667 infection.
(D) The frequency (left) and total numbers (right) of Mtb-specific CD4
or CD8 T cells, from nine independent paired Erdman (closed symbols) and
667 (open symbols) infections. Each point is the average of 4–8 mice and
lines connect the paired infections. (E) The number of TB10.4-specific
CD8 T cells in the lungs of mice infected with Erdman (closed symbols)
or 667 (open symbols) was quantified by staining the different cell
populations using the TB10.44−11/Kb tetramer
(i.e., loaded with IMYNYPAM) or the
A10TTB10.44−11/Kb tetramer (i.e.,
loaded with IMYNYPTM) separately using individual
mice from 4 independent paired infections, 38 mice in total. The data
was pooled and analyzed. The diagonal line is the line of unity for this
analysis. (F) Absolute numbers of TB10.4-specific CD8 T cells in the
lungs of mice infected with Erdman or 667. The number of cells was
determined by staining with the TB10.44−11/Kb
tetramer (i.e., loaded with IMYNYPAM) or the
A10TTB10.44−11/Kb tetramer (i.e.,
loaded with IMYNYPTM). Nine independent
experiments were performed and analyzed 4–6 weeks post infection, with a
total of 96 mice. Statistical testing by a two-tailed, unpaired
Student’s T test. **, p<0.01; ***, p<0.005; and ****,
p<0.0001.
The hierarchy of immunodominant CD8 T cell responses after Erdman vs.
667 infection.
Lung T cell responses were evaluated five weeks after infection of
C57BL/6J mice with ~100 aerosolized Erdman or 667 bacilli. (A)
Representative flow cytometry plots of MTB32a309-318 and
TB10.44−11 tetramer staining of pulmonary CD8 T cells
from Erdman- or 667-infected C57BL/6J mice. The frequency (B) or
absolute number (C) of TB10.4- or MTB32a-specific CD8, or ESAT6-specific
CD4 T cells in the lungs of infected mice after Erdman or 667 infection.
(D) The frequency (left) and total numbers (right) of Mtb-specific CD4
or CD8 T cells, from nine independent paired Erdman (closed symbols) and
667 (open symbols) infections. Each point is the average of 4–8 mice and
lines connect the paired infections. (E) The number of TB10.4-specific
CD8 T cells in the lungs of mice infected with Erdman (closed symbols)
or 667 (open symbols) was quantified by staining the different cell
populations using the TB10.44−11/Kb tetramer
(i.e., loaded with IMYNYPAM) or the
A10TTB10.44−11/Kb tetramer (i.e.,
loaded with IMYNYPTM) separately using individual
mice from 4 independent paired infections, 38 mice in total. The data
was pooled and analyzed. The diagonal line is the line of unity for this
analysis. (F) Absolute numbers of TB10.4-specific CD8 T cells in the
lungs of mice infected with Erdman or 667. The number of cells was
determined by staining with the TB10.44−11/Kb
tetramer (i.e., loaded with IMYNYPAM) or the
A10TTB10.44−11/Kb tetramer (i.e.,
loaded with IMYNYPTM). Nine independent
experiments were performed and analyzed 4–6 weeks post infection, with a
total of 96 mice. Statistical testing by a two-tailed, unpaired
Student’s T test. **, p<0.01; ***, p<0.005; and ****,
p<0.0001.We next considered whether the reduction in the TB10.44−11-specific
CD8 T cell response observed after 667 infection could be arise from a change in
the fine specificity of TB10.44−11-specific CD8 T cells in 667
infected mice such that they preferentially recognized the A10T epitope. To test
this possibility, we compared WTTB10.44−11/Kb
tetramers to tetramers loaded with the “A10T” variant peptide
IMYNYPTM (hereafter referred to as
“A10TTB10.44−11”). Direct comparison of the two
tetramers showed that both identified in similar number of
TB10.44−11-specific CD8 T cells in Erdman-infected mice (Fig 2E, filled symbols). In
contrast, in 667-infected mice, the
WTTB10.44−11/Kb tetramer underestimated the
number of TB10.44−11-specific CD8 T cells (Fig 2E, open symbols). This suggested that
two populations of T cells elicited by Erdman and 667 differed in the avidity
for the peptide/MHC complex. To determine the magnitude of this effect, we
performed competitive tetramer staining. The
WTTB10.44−11/Kb tetramers, but not the
A10TTB10.44−11/Kb tetramers, bound CD8 T
cells elicited by Erdman suggesting higher avidity interaction of the former
(S2A
Fig). In contrast, both tetramers bound to 667-elicited TB10-specific
CD8 T cells, although there was a clear preference for the
A10TTB10.44−11/Kb tetramer despite the
ability of both tetramers to bind independently (S2B Fig).
Hereafter we used the A10TTB10.44−11/Kb
tetramer to quantify TB10.44−11-specific CD8 T cells after 667
infection. The number of TB10.44−11-specific CD8 T cells was 271,000
± 163,000 after Erdman infection compared to 9,500 ± 19,000 after 667 infection
(Fig 2F, p<0.0001,
median ± SD). Thus, the CD8 T cell response to TB10.44−11 after 667
infection was largely abolished.Since we observed a loss of the dominant TB10.44−11 response during
667 infection, we sought to determine whether a cryptic epitope of TB10.4 would
emerge after 667 infection. Cryptic epitopes are ones that do not ordinarily
elicit a T cell response but can induce T cells if immunodominance is altered as
has been described for ESAT6 [28]. We screened a peptide library of the TB10.4 protein plus other
known epitopes using T cells from 667-infected or Erdman-infected mice but did
not identify any new epitopes (S2 Table, S3 Fig). We
also sought to determine whether the EsxHA10T polymorphism affected
the Kd-restricted CD8 T cell response to TB10.420−28 or
the I-Ad-restricted CD4 T cell response to TB10.474−88 in
Mtb-infected BALB/c mice [23, 29]. The
TB10.420−28-specific CD8 T cell response was diminished in 667
vs. Erdman infected mice only in one of three experiments (S4 Fig).
The TB10.474−88-specific CD4 T cell response was of similar magnitude
after 667 or Erdman infection in all experiments (S4 Fig).
Thus, these data show that 667 infection elicits a hierarchy of Mtb-specific CD8
T cells that quantitatively differs from the reproducible hierarchy elicited by
Erdman infection in C57BL/6 mice. These data are consistent with
immunodomination being the mechanism by which immunodominant
TB10.44−11-specific CD8 T cell response suppresses other
subdominant responses and indicates that the EsxHA10T polymorphism
can be used to perturb the hierarchy of Mtb antigens recognized by CD8 T
cells.
667 is less fit than Erdman
We predicted that abolishing a “decoy antigen” would enhance the ability of the
immune response to mediate protection against Mtb. To determine the ability of
the immune response to control 667 vs. Erdman bacterial replication, mice were
infected with each strain using a low-dose aerosol infection model. In 13
independent experiments across several time points, 667-infected mice had fewer
CFU in the lung and spleen compared to Erdman-infected mice and had prolonged
survival (Fig 3A–3C). Thus,
it appears that 667 is less virulent than Erdman. However, as a clinical
isolate, 667 is by definition virulent; and the Erdman strain used in these
experiments has been passaged through mice to maintain its virulence. While the
pathogenic potential of these two strains is determined in part by intrinsic
factors (i.e., genetically determined), we wished to assess how differences in
the adaptive immune response elicited by these two mycobacterial strains affects
pathogenicity.
Fig 3
Infection with 667 is less virulent than Erdman.
The bacterial burden is measured by CFU from lung (A) or spleen (B)
homogenates from Erdman (filled) or 667 (open) infected C57BL/6J at
different timepoints post infections. CFU data were compiled from 13
(lung) or 6 (spleen) independent experiments, from 4 to 30 weeks post
infections. (C) The survival of C57BL/6 mice after Erdman (solid) or 667
(dashed) infection, which is one of two independent results with similar
results. In this experiment, the d1 CFU was 158 (667) or 55 (Erdman).
(D-E) A barcoded pool of clinical Mtb isolates was administered
intravenously to C57BL/6J (black) or RAG1 KO (red) mice, and 4–8 mice of
each strain were harvested for lungs and spleens to recover bacteria at
1 (circle), 14 (triangle), and 21 (square) days post infection. (D) The
pseudo CFU of 667 and Erdman in spleen were determined by the relative
abundance of the respective Mtb strains multiplied by total CFU in the
spleen. (E) CFU fold-change (versus d1 CFU) of 667 or Erdman abundance
in the spleen was compared between C57BL/6J (black) and RAG1 KO (red)
mice. (F) CFU fold-change (versus d1 CFU) of 667 (open) vs. Erdman
(closed) in the spleens of C57BL/6J (black) and RAG1 KO (red) mice.
Statistical significance of survival curves (C) was determined by
log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test; p value is shown. Statistical significance
of CFU fold-change (D, E, F) were analyzed by a two-way ANOVA with Tukey
(D) or Sidak’s (E, F) multiple comparison test. p values are indicated
by asterisks: **, p<0.01, ***, p<0.001, ****, p<0.0001. Not all
comparisons are shown for clarity.
Infection with 667 is less virulent than Erdman.
The bacterial burden is measured by CFU from lung (A) or spleen (B)
homogenates from Erdman (filled) or 667 (open) infected C57BL/6J at
different timepoints post infections. CFU data were compiled from 13
(lung) or 6 (spleen) independent experiments, from 4 to 30 weeks post
infections. (C) The survival of C57BL/6 mice after Erdman (solid) or 667
(dashed) infection, which is one of two independent results with similar
results. In this experiment, the d1 CFU was 158 (667) or 55 (Erdman).
(D-E) A barcoded pool of clinical Mtb isolates was administered
intravenously to C57BL/6J (black) or RAG1 KO (red) mice, and 4–8 mice of
each strain were harvested for lungs and spleens to recover bacteria at
1 (circle), 14 (triangle), and 21 (square) days post infection. (D) The
pseudo CFU of 667 and Erdman in spleen were determined by the relative
abundance of the respective Mtb strains multiplied by total CFU in the
spleen. (E) CFU fold-change (versus d1 CFU) of 667 or Erdman abundance
in the spleen was compared between C57BL/6J (black) and RAG1 KO (red)
mice. (F) CFU fold-change (versus d1 CFU) of 667 (open) vs. Erdman
(closed) in the spleens of C57BL/6J (black) and RAG1 KO (red) mice.
Statistical significance of survival curves (C) was determined by
log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test; p value is shown. Statistical significance
of CFU fold-change (D, E, F) were analyzed by a two-way ANOVA with Tukey
(D) or Sidak’s (E, F) multiple comparison test. p values are indicated
by asterisks: **, p<0.01, ***, p<0.001, ****, p<0.0001. Not all
comparisons are shown for clarity.To determine whether the different T cell responses elicited by 667 and Erdman
(see Fig 2) affected their
growth in vivo, RAG1 KO and C57BL/6J mice were infected with a
pool of barcoded Mtb clinical isolates, which also contained Erdman and 667, by
the intravenous route. In the spleens of RAG1 KO mice, 667 grew similarly to
Erdman, showing that in the absence of T and B cells, 667 did not have a growth
defect (Fig 3D). In C57BL/6J
mice, which have an intact immune system, both strains were similarly
controlled, as indicated by no change in their relative abundance between 2 to 3
weeks after infection (Fig
3E). When the relative increase of 667 and Erdman were directly
compared, there was no difference except in the spleens of RAG1 KO mice 3 wpi
(Fig 3F). Thus, 667 is
not intrinsically attenuated and we conclude that adaptive immunity is critical
in controlling bacterial growth, most clearly observed by the change in relative
abundance between RAG1 KO and C57BL/6J mice, two- and three-weeks
post-infection.
The A10T polymorphism alters the CD8 T cell response elicited by Mtb
infection
Our experiments with 667 and Erdman show that naturally occurring polymorphisms
between pathogenic Mtb strains can alter the hierarchy of antigens that CD8 T
cells recognize and affect the outcome of infection. As there are 1,700 snps
between Erdman and 667, we next sought to determine if EsxHA10T was
sufficient to alter the hierarchy of the CD8 T cells response elicited by Mtb.
Oligo recombineering was used to change a single amino acid in the
TB10.44−11 epitope from IMYNYPAM (i.e.,
the Erdman “allele”) to IMYNYPTM (the 667 “allele”),
which allowed us to generate isogenic Erdman strains that differed only at this
position (S5A
Fig). Hereafter, we will refer to these isogenic strains as
Erd.EsxHWT and Erd.EsxHA10T, respectively. Using
unmanipulated Erdman strain as a reference for normalization, these isogenic
strains had equivalent mRNA expression of the genes that encode immunodominant
antigens including esxH (S5B
Fig).We measured antigen-specific T cell responses elicited by infection with the
isogenic strains Erd.EsxHWT and Erd.EsxHA10T, using
specific tetramers (i.e., the WTTB10.44−11/Kb
and A10TTB10.44−11/Kb tetramers, respectively).
After Erd.EsxHA10T infection, there was a significant reduction in
the TB10.44−11-specific CD8 T cell response in C57BL/6J, as observed
after 667 infection (Fig 4A and
4B). Similarly, the frequency and absolute number of
MTB32a309-318-specific CD8 T cells was significantly increased
after Erd.EsxHA10T infection compared to Erd.EsxHWT (Fig 4A and 4B). The CD4 T cell
responses to ESAT6, Ag85B, and EsxG after Erd.EsxHWT and
Erd.EsxHA10T, were similar. Mtb-specific T cell response elicited
by Erd.EsxHWT or Erd.EsxHA10T infection in BALB/c mice did
not differ, similar to 667 infection (S6 Fig). When determined whether the change
in immunodominance was associated with improved bacterial control, the bacterial
burden in the lung and spleen did not significantly differ between
Erd.EsxHWT versus Erd.EsxHA10T infected mice (Fig 4C). Thus, the
EsxHA10T polymorphism is sufficient to alter the hierarchy of
immunodominant CD8 T cell responses in C57BL/6J mice, but under these conditions
did not affect bacterial growth.
Fig 4
The A10T polymorphism leads to a change in immunodominance of the CD8
T cell response after 667 infection.
C57BL/6J mice were infected with Erd.EsxHA10T or
Erd.EsxHWT by the aerosol route and the lung T cell
response was analyzed five weeks later by (A-B) tetramer staining and
(C) the bacterial burden. (A) Representative flow cytometry plots of the
frequency of MTB32a309-318- and
TB10.44−11-specific CD8 T cells (left), or ESAT6-specific CD4
T cells (right), after Erd.EsxHWT or Erd.EsxHA10T
infection in the lungs of C57BL/6J mice. (B) The frequency and absolute
number of antigen-specific T cells elicited by five independent paired
infections of isogenic Erd.EsxHWT (open) and
Erd.EsxHA10T (closed) strains determined by tetramer
staining. The TB10-specific CD8 T cell responses elicited by the
isogenic strains Erd.EsxHWT and Erd.EsxHA10T, was
determined using the specific tetramers
WTTB10.44−11/Kb and
A10TTB10.44−11/Kb tetramers,
respectively. Each point is the average of 5 mice and lines connect the
paired infections. (C) The bacterial burden was measured by CFU from
lung (left) or spleen (right) homogenates from Erd.EsxHWT or
Erd.EsxHA10T infected C57BL/6J at different timepoints
post infections. CFU data were compiled from 4 independent experiments,
from 5 to 19 weeks post infections. Statistical significance was
determined by a two-tailed, unpaired Student’s T test. p values are
indicated by asterisks: *, <0.05; **, p<0.01; ***, p<0.001;
****, p<0.0001.
The A10T polymorphism leads to a change in immunodominance of the CD8
T cell response after 667 infection.
C57BL/6J mice were infected with Erd.EsxHA10T or
Erd.EsxHWT by the aerosol route and the lung T cell
response was analyzed five weeks later by (A-B) tetramer staining and
(C) the bacterial burden. (A) Representative flow cytometry plots of the
frequency of MTB32a309-318- and
TB10.44−11-specific CD8 T cells (left), or ESAT6-specific CD4
T cells (right), after Erd.EsxHWT or Erd.EsxHA10T
infection in the lungs of C57BL/6J mice. (B) The frequency and absolute
number of antigen-specific T cells elicited by five independent paired
infections of isogenic Erd.EsxHWT (open) and
Erd.EsxHA10T (closed) strains determined by tetramer
staining. The TB10-specific CD8 T cell responses elicited by the
isogenic strains Erd.EsxHWT and Erd.EsxHA10T, was
determined using the specific tetramers
WTTB10.44−11/Kb and
A10TTB10.44−11/Kb tetramers,
respectively. Each point is the average of 5 mice and lines connect the
paired infections. (C) The bacterial burden was measured by CFU from
lung (left) or spleen (right) homogenates from Erd.EsxHWT or
Erd.EsxHA10T infected C57BL/6J at different timepoints
post infections. CFU data were compiled from 4 independent experiments,
from 5 to 19 weeks post infections. Statistical significance was
determined by a two-tailed, unpaired Student’s T test. p values are
indicated by asterisks: *, <0.05; **, p<0.01; ***, p<0.001;
****, p<0.0001.
667-infected macrophages inefficiently present Mtb antigens to CD8 T
cells
The CD8 T cell contribution to Mtb control can be difficult to demonstrate,
especially in the face of an intact CD4 T cell response. Therefore, we next
sought to determine whether altering the hierarchy of immunodominant CD8 T cell
responses led to function changes in the recognition of infected macrophages. We
previously reported that TB10.44−11-specific CD8 T cells do not
recognize infected macrophages [9]. Given the dominance of the TB10.44−11-specific CD8 T
cell response in the lung, we hypothesized that TB10.4 might be acting as a
decoy antigen. Our finding that following 667 and Erd.EsxHA10T
infections, few TB10.44−11-specific CD8 T cells were detected and
instead, a greater expansion of MTB32a-specific CD8 T cells were elicited,
supported this idea (Fig 2
and Fig 4). To further test
this hypothesis, we determined whether abrogation of the immunodominant
TB10.44−11 epitope resulted in an expansion of CD8 T cells that
better recognized Mtb-infected macrophages. Therefore, we quantified T cell
recognition of Mtb-infected macrophages by the Mtb-infected macrophage
intracellular cytokine staining assay (MIM-ICS) [30].Pulmonary T cells were purified from the Erdman- or 667-infected C57BL/6J mice
and co-cultured with H37Rv-infected macrophages. IFNγ production was measured by
the MIM-ICS assay as a readout of T cell recognition [30]. CD4 T cells from Erdman- or
667-infected C57BL/6J mice recognized H37Rv-infected macrophages similarly, and
in a dose-dependent manner (Fig
5A). Thus, these two bacterial strains elicit CD4 T cell responses
that had a similar capacity to recognize infected macrophages. There was little
or no recognition of infected macrophages by CD8 T cells at a low MOI, as
previously reported [30].
Contrary to our prediction, Erdman-elicited CD8 T cells, but not 667-elicited
CD8 T cells, recognized H37Rv-infected macrophages at a high MOI (Fig 5B).
Fig 5
T cell recognition of infected macrophages.
CD4 (A, C) or CD8 T cells (B, D) purified from the lungs of Erdman- or
667-infected mice were cultured with H37Rv-infected (A, B) or
667-infected (C, D) macrophages and the MIM-ICS assay was performed.
MIM-ICS assay of isogenic strains elicited (E) CD4 T cells and (F) CD8 T
cells in recognizing H37Rv-infected macrophages. Isogenic strains
elicited CD8 T cells were also measured for their recognition ability of
(G) Erd.EsxHWT-infected and (H)
Erd.EsxHA10T-infected macrophages. The X axis is the actual
multiplicity of infection (MOI) as determined by CFU plating.
Statistical significance was determined by multiple t testing, and p
values <0.05 are shown above the bars. (I) Erd.EsxHWT- or
Erd.EsxHA10T-elicited CD8 T cells were cultured with
uninfected macrophages (UI) or macrophages plus the indicated peptide
epitopes or anti-CD3 mAb. Statistical significance was determined by
one-way Anova, and p values <0.05 are shown above the bars. Results
are representative of two (A-H) or three (I) different independent
experiments.
T cell recognition of infected macrophages.
CD4 (A, C) or CD8 T cells (B, D) purified from the lungs of Erdman- or
667-infected mice were cultured with H37Rv-infected (A, B) or
667-infected (C, D) macrophages and the MIM-ICS assay was performed.
MIM-ICS assay of isogenic strains elicited (E) CD4 T cells and (F) CD8 T
cells in recognizing H37Rv-infected macrophages. Isogenic strains
elicited CD8 T cells were also measured for their recognition ability of
(G) Erd.EsxHWT-infected and (H)
Erd.EsxHA10T-infected macrophages. The X axis is the actual
multiplicity of infection (MOI) as determined by CFU plating.
Statistical significance was determined by multiple t testing, and p
values <0.05 are shown above the bars. (I) Erd.EsxHWT- or
Erd.EsxHA10T-elicited CD8 T cells were cultured with
uninfected macrophages (UI) or macrophages plus the indicated peptide
epitopes or anti-CD3 mAb. Statistical significance was determined by
one-way Anova, and p values <0.05 are shown above the bars. Results
are representative of two (A-H) or three (I) different independent
experiments.We considered whether the inability of 667-elicited CD8 T cells to recognize
H37Rv-infected macrophages could reflect a strain- or lineage-specific CD8 T
cell response. To address this question, we performed the reciprocal experiment
and measured the ability of CD4 or CD8 T cells from Erdman- or 667-infected mice
to recognize 667-infected macrophages. CD4 T cells from Erdman- and 667-infected
mice recognized 667-infected macrophages similarly (Fig 5C). In contrast, neither Erdman nor
667-elicited CD8 T cells significantly recognized 667-infected macrophages
(Fig 5D). When
considering the bacterial loads of in vitro H37Rv and 667
infections, the actual MOIs were not significantly different among paired
conditions (S7A
Fig), suggesting that the bacterial uptake or intracellular growth
were similar. These results show how the mycobacterial strain can profoundly
affect antigen presentation and subsequent CD8 T cell responses.We next determined whether the altered CD8 T cell response elicited by
Erd.EsxHA10T affected global recognition of Mtb-infected
macrophages by T cells. CD4 and CD8 T cells from Erd.EsxHWT and
Erd.EsxHA10T infected mice recognized H37Rv-infected macrophages
similarly (Fig 5E and 5F).
CD8 T cells from Erd.EsxHWT and Erd.EsxHA10T-infected mice
also recognized Erd.EsxHWT-infected macrophages similarly (Fig 5G). Since
Erd.EsxHA10T fails to elicit an immunodominant response to the
TB10.44−11 epitope, one may have expected Erd.EsxHWT
elicited CD8 T cells to recognize Mtb-infected macrophages better than CD8 T
cells elicited by Erd.EsxHA10T. However, the similar recognition of
Mtb-infected macrophages is consistent with the failure of the
TB10.44−11 epitope to be presented by Erd.EsxHWT or
H37Rv-infected macrophages [9]. These results were independently confirmed by showing that
polyclonal CD8 T cells from Erdman-infected mice recognize
ΔesxH- and
esxH-complemented
ΔesxH-infected macrophages similarly (S8 Fig).
Surprisingly, Erd.EsxHWT-elicited CD8 T cells failed to recognize
Erd.EsxHA10T-infected macrophages as well as
Erd.EsxHA10T-elicited CD8 T cells (Fig 5H), despite the ability of
antigen-specific CD8 T cells from both Erd.EsxHWT and
Erd.EsxHA10T
in vivo infections to activate and recognize their cognate
epitopes (Fig 5I). Again,
the bacterial loads of in vitro Erd.EsxHWT and
Erd.EsxHA10T infections were not significantly different (S7B Fig).
Thus, natural EsxHA10T polymorphism induce distinct T cell responses
that affect the ability of elicited T cells to recognize infected macrophages.
We next sought to understand mechanistically why the EsxHA10T
polymorphism abrogated the CD8 T cell response to the TB10.44−11
epitope.
CD8 T cells recognize naturally occurring variants of the
TB10.44−11 epitope
The EsxHA10T polymorphism could abrogate the CD8 T cell response
because the epitope is no longer produced, because it fails to bind to class I
MHC, or because it is no longer recognized by T cells. As the A10T polymorphism,
similar to most esxH polymorphisms, is within the
TB10.44−11 epitope and doesn’t affect presentation of other TB10
epitopes (S4
Fig, S6 Fig), we hypothesized that the polymorphism would disrupt
TB10.44−11 binding to H-2 Kb. Among the variant
epitopes (i.e., P9S, A10T, A10V and M11I), only small differences were predicted
in their binding to Kb, compared to the WT dominant sequence (i.e.,
IMYNYPAM) and all had IC50 values between 5.6–9.5 nM
(S3
Table). We experimentally confirmed these predictions by an RMA-S
Kb stabilization assay using synthetic WT, P9S, A10T, A10V and
M11I peptides (S2 Table). Data was analyzed after normalization and modeling using
ECAnything (Prism 8). WT peptide stabilized Kb expression with an
IC50 of 14,363, which was ~2-fold greater than the SIINFEKL peptide control
(IC50: 7,318) (see Fig 6A,
S9
Fig) [31]. The
IMANAPAM peptide with Y6A/Y8A
mutations, was designed and predicted to bind Kb 200-fold less than
the WT epitope and failed to stabilize Kb (Fig 6A, S3 Table).
The WT peptide was only 1.5-2-fold more effective at stabilizing Kb
than A10T (IC50: 28,078), M11I (IC50: 29,075), A10V (IC50: 21,278), and 4.1-fold
better than P9S (IC50: 59,349). Thus, it was unlikely that MHC binding could
account for the inability of the A10T variant to elicit
TB10.44−11-specific CD8 T cells.
Fig 6
Naturally occurring variants of the TB10.44−11 epitopes
bind Kb and stimulate TB10.44−11-specific CD8 T
cells.
(A) RMA-S Kb stabilization assay. Variant peptides were
titrated, added to RMA-S cells, and the relative H-2 Kb
surface expression (MFI) was determined by flow cytometry. The following
peptides were used: SIINFEKL (positive control), IMANAPAM (negative
control), “WT” TB10.44−11, and the following variants of
TB10.44−11: A10T, A10V, P9S, and M11I. (B) The
proliferation of the TB10.44−11-specific CD8 T cell line
TB10RgR was measured by eFluor450 dilution 48 hours after co-culture
with macrophages pulsed with titrated amounts of the indicated peptides.
(C) Proliferative response of the TB10RgP, TB10Rg3, TB10RgR, and TB10RgL
CD8 T cell lines 48 hours after co-culture with macrophages pulsed with
titrated amounts of WT TB10 peptide (left) or A10T peptide (right). Each
assay was repeated 4 times.
Naturally occurring variants of the TB10.44−11 epitopes
bind Kb and stimulate TB10.44−11-specific CD8 T
cells.
(A) RMA-S Kb stabilization assay. Variant peptides were
titrated, added to RMA-S cells, and the relative H-2 Kb
surface expression (MFI) was determined by flow cytometry. The following
peptides were used: SIINFEKL (positive control), IMANAPAM (negative
control), “WT” TB10.44−11, and the following variants of
TB10.44−11: A10T, A10V, P9S, and M11I. (B) The
proliferation of the TB10.44−11-specific CD8 T cell line
TB10RgR was measured by eFluor450 dilution 48 hours after co-culture
with macrophages pulsed with titrated amounts of the indicated peptides.
(C) Proliferative response of the TB10RgP, TB10Rg3, TB10RgR, and TB10RgL
CD8 T cell lines 48 hours after co-culture with macrophages pulsed with
titrated amounts of WT TB10 peptide (left) or A10T peptide (right). Each
assay was repeated 4 times.In the context of H2-Kb, some of the polymorphic residues, including
the 7th amino acid of epitope, the location of the A10T substitution,
were predicted to be solvent exposed and make contact with the TCR [31]. To address whether the
variations in the TB10.44−11 sequence affected T cell recognition, we
used primary CD8 T cell lines elicited by M.
tuberculosis Erdman and specific for the WT
TB10.44−11 epitope [9]. The TB10RgR CD8 T cell line recognized
and proliferated in a dose-dependent manner to all polymorphic peptide epitopes
with the following hierarchy WT ~ M11I > A10T ~ A10V > P9S (Fig 6B), an order similar to
the peptide’s ability to stabilize cell surface Kb expression on
RMA-S cells. Thus, we infer that T cell recognition was largely driven by
peptide binding to Kb. We used other TB10.44−11-specific
CD8 T cell lines (TB10Rg3, TB10RgL and TB10RgP), all with distinct TCRs. We
compared the ability of TB10RgR, TB10Rg3, TB10RgL and TB10RgP to recognize the
WT and A10T epitopes.All four T cell lines recognized the two TB10 epitopes with a similar hierarchy:
TB10RgP ~ TB10Rg3 > TB10RgR > TB10RgL (Fig 6C). While TB10RgP, TB10Rg3, and TB10RgR
all recognized the WT and A10T epitopes similarly, TB10RgL only recognized the
A10T epitope with low avidity. Importantly, the TCRs used by TB10RgR and TB10RgL
differ by two amino acids–one in the CDR3α region and one in the CDR3β region
[13]. As both of
these T cells were elicited by the WT epitope, and were clonally expanded
in vivo [13], these data show the fine specificity of TCRs for their cognate
antigens, and reveals how T cells elicited against one Mtb strain (including
vaccine strains) may be unable to recognize other Mtb strains. Importantly,
these data show that the A10T epitope of 667 can both bind to Kb and
be recognized by T cells. Thus, the different marked reduction of the
TB10.44−11-specific CD8 T cell response following 667 and
Erd.EsxHA10T infection cannot be explained by an inability of CD8
T cells to recognize the variant IMYNYPTM epitope.
The A10T polymorphism alters TB104-11 epitope production
Why the A10T substitution in the TB10.4 protein should abrogate the
TB10.44−11-specific CD8 T cell responses was unclear. As the A10T
variant peptide (i.e., IMYNYPTM) could bind to
Kb (Fig 6A,
S3
Table) and was recognized by TB10.44−11-specific CD8 T
cells, we predicted Mtb strains with the A10T polymorphism should elicit
TB10.44−11-specific CD8 T cells. We next hypothesized whether the
A10T polymorphism affects the antigen processing of the TB10.4 protein in
Mtb-infected cells.The processing of the TB10.44−11 epitopes by lysosomal extracts from
murine macrophages was quantified by mass spectrometry [31-33]. Briefly 34-mer peptides (i.e.,
TB10.41−34) containing alanine (WT) or threonine (A10T) at
residue 10 were incubated with C57BL/6J thioglycolate-elicited peritoneal
macrophage (TG-PM) or bone-marrow derived dendritic cell (BMDC) lysosomal
extracts and degradation peptides and cleavage sites were identified and
quantified at various time points (Fig 7A and 7B, and S10A Fig). This assay recapitulates
endogenous processing of epitopes in primary cells while allowing the analysis
of peptide production and cleavage sites [31]. We analyzed the relative amount of
peptides starting (N-terminus) or ending (C-terminus) at each residue during
macrophage or BMDC lysosomal degradation (Fig 7C and S10B Fig).
Both N- and C-terminal cleavage sites were mostly in the first third of the
sequence. During macrophage lysosomal degradation, cutting sites after residues
I4 and Y6 within epitope IMYNYP[A/T]M (TB10.44−11) were significantly
higher in the A10T 34-mer while Y8 (and Y21 outside the epitope) were more
frequent in the WT sequence. In BMDC lysosomal extracts (from the same mice as
the macrophages) enhanced N- and C-terminal cleavage sites were observed at
residue Y2 within TB10.44−11 epitope and at several sites outside the
epitope (S10B
Fig). These results are consistent with variant A10T altering peptide
degradation patterns in macrophage and BMDC lysosomes.
Fig 7
Different peptide degradation patterns of TB10.41−34 with
alanine or threonine at position 10 in macrophage lysosomes.
(A) Amino acid sequence of 34-mer peptides (i.e., TB10.41−34)
containing alanine (WT) or threonine (A10T) at residue 10 (B)
Experimental scheme of the in vitro peptide degradation
assay in macrophage lysosomal extracts and WT and A10T TB10.4-1-34-mer
sequences. (C) N- (left) and C- (right) terminus cleavage sites
determined at 60 minutes. The relative amount of peptides starting (left
panel) or ending (right panel) at each residue was quantified during the
degradation of WT (black bars) and A10T (open bars) TB10.4-1-34-mer
peptides. N = 6 experiments; *, p<0.05. (D) Production of
TB10.44−11 epitope (left panel) and N-extended
TB10.44−11 (right panel) from WT (black circles) or A10T
34-mer (open circles) at 60 minutes. One representative experiment. (E)
Production of TB10.44−11 epitope from WT (black circles) and
A10T (open circles) TB10.4-1-34-mer peptides was determined at 10, 30,
60 minutes in six independent experiments. P values calculated with
Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test.
Different peptide degradation patterns of TB10.41−34 with
alanine or threonine at position 10 in macrophage lysosomes.
(A) Amino acid sequence of 34-mer peptides (i.e., TB10.41−34)
containing alanine (WT) or threonine (A10T) at residue 10 (B)
Experimental scheme of the in vitro peptide degradation
assay in macrophage lysosomal extracts and WT and A10T TB10.4-1-34-mer
sequences. (C) N- (left) and C- (right) terminus cleavage sites
determined at 60 minutes. The relative amount of peptides starting (left
panel) or ending (right panel) at each residue was quantified during the
degradation of WT (black bars) and A10T (open bars) TB10.4-1-34-mer
peptides. N = 6 experiments; *, p<0.05. (D) Production of
TB10.44−11 epitope (left panel) and N-extended
TB10.44−11 (right panel) from WT (black circles) or A10T
34-mer (open circles) at 60 minutes. One representative experiment. (E)
Production of TB10.44−11 epitope from WT (black circles) and
A10T (open circles) TB10.4-1-34-mer peptides was determined at 10, 30,
60 minutes in six independent experiments. P values calculated with
Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test.We measured the production of TB10.44−11 and N-extended
TB10.44−11 over a 1-hour degradation (Fig 7D; S10C Fig).
The production of the TB10.44−11 IMYNYPAM from
the WT 34-mer was detected at 2 minutes only in macrophages (0.043% of total
amount of peptides) and increased over 60 minutes (0.297%). In contrast the
production of IMYNYPTM was slower (none detected after 2
minutes), peaked at 10 minutes (0.147%) and decreased (0.09 and 0.067% left at
30 and 60 minutes), leaving IMYNYPTM production 2.7 to
4.7-fold lower than IMYNYPAM production at these time
points. In BMDC TB10.44−11 IMYNYPAM and
IMYNYPTM epitopes were not detected at 2 minutes but
similarly produced at 10 and 30 minutes. The production of WT
IMYNYPAM kept increasing to 0.499% while that of
IMYNYPTM plateaued at 0.252% (S10C Fig
left panel). Thus, in agreement with the degradation patterns, in both cell
types, the production of IMYNYPTM is reduced due to
higher sensitivity to lysosomal degradation. We also measured the production of
N-extended TB10.44−11 as N-extended peptides may still bind poorly to
MHC but also reveal patterns of reduced antigen processing (Fig 7D and S10C Fig,
right panels). In both macrophages and BMDC, IMYNYPTM
peptides N-extended by up to 3aa were produced in higher quantity at all time
points with a peak of at 10.36% at 10 minutes in macrophages and 4.9% in BMDC
while N-extended IMYNYPAM remained <4.32% in
macrophages and 2.5% in BMDC at all time points. These data suggest that
IMYNYPTM extended by 1, 2, or 3 aa may not be
efficiently trimmed, but possibly lead to shorter peptides that destroy the
IMYNYPTM epitope, as seen by the presence of enhanced
cleavage sites within IMYNYPTM. The higher production of
IMYNYPAM compared to IMYNYPTM
was also observed when the substrate was the first 25aa of the sequence showing
the effect of the mutation on peptide production was not due to the use of a
specific 34mer peptide.We measured the production of TB10.44−11
IMYNYPAM or IMYNYPTM and
N-extended peptides in 6–7 different experiments with extracts from matched
macrophages and BMDC from different batches of mice (Fig 7E, S10D Fig).
While the amount of peptide produced in each experiment was variable between
batches, the mutation A10T significantly reduced the production of
IMYNYPTM peptide at 30–60 minutes in macrophages
while its effect was less pronounced in BMDC. N-extended
IMYNYPTM peptides were significantly better produced
after a 30–60 minutes degradation in both cell types (Fig 7E, S10D
Fig).Altogether our data suggest that murine macrophages and to a lesser extent DC may
not be able to process and present IMYNYPTM, or present
it less efficiently, thus explaining the inefficient priming and expansion of
TB10.44−11-specific CD8 T cells following 667 or
Erd.EsxHA10T infection and the inefficient recognition of
macrophages infected with 667. Therefore, the A10T polymorphism results in
impaired processing of a CD8 T cell antigen and has a profound effect on the
hierarchy of Mtb-specific CD8 T cells.
Discussion
Here, we leverage a natural occurring polymorphism (i.e., the A10T substitution) in
the EsxH protein to uncover the hierarchical structure of the antigen-specific CD8 T
cell response elicited by Mtb. The TB10.44−11-specific CD8 T cell
response, which is immunodominant in C57BL/6J mice after H37Rv or Erdman infection,
was largely absent after infection with 667 or Erd.EsxHA10T. This was
accompanied by an expansion of the sub-dominant MTB32a309-318-specific
CD8 T cell response. This outcome was surprising as the A10T and WT variants of the
TB10.44−11 epitope had similar abilities to bind Kb and
stimulate T cell proliferation. Instead, a change in the processing of the
TB10.44−11 epitope modulated the CD8 response. To our knowledge, this
is the first demonstration of a single amino acid substitution causing a major
antigenic shift in the Mtb-specific CD8 T cell response following infection with
virulent Mtb. These mechanistic insights provide a basis for reprograming host
immune responses, which is an important consideration for the future design of
vaccines against TB.We previously reported that TB10.44−11-specific CD8 T cells do not
efficiently recognize infected macrophages [9]. We speculated that TB10.4 might act as a
decoy antigen, which interferes with the expansion of CD8 T cells that recognize Mtb
epitopes presented by Mtb-infected macrophages. To test this hypothesis, we
engineered isogenic strain Erdman strains with the EsxHA10T polymorphism,
to determine how the overall CD8 T cell response would change in the absence of the
TB10.44−11 immunodominant epitope. The ability of polyclonal CD8 T
cells, elicited in the presence or absence of the TB10.44−11 epitope, to
recognize Mtb-infected macrophages was measured by the MIM-ICS assay [30]. Two different aspects of
CD8 responses were assessed by this assay: 1) the specificity and frequency of T
cells elicited by Mtb in vivo (i.e., T cell priming); and 2)
processing and presentation of Mtb antigens by infected macrophages in
vitro. Varying the Mtb strain had no effect on CD4 T cell recognition
of infected macrophages, indicating that our matching of the infectious dose of the
different mycobacterial strains in vivo and in
vitro was adequate. We found that 667-infected macrophages poorly
stimulated CD8 T cells compared to H37Rv-infected macrophages, demonstrating antigen
presentation can be altered by Mtb polymorphisms. Finally,
Erd.EsxHA10T-elicited CD8 T cells recognized macrophages infected with
Erd.EsxHA10T better than with Erd.EsxHWT (compare Fig 5G vs. 5H). From this result we infer that
Erd.EsxHA10T changes the repertoire of Mtb-specific CD8 T cell
elicited by in vivo infection and alters class I MHC presentation
by infected macrophages.Our initial prediction was that Erd.EsxHA10T infection would elicit a
higher frequency of CD8 T cells capable of recognizing infected macrophages than
Erd.EsxHWT. While both Erd.EsxHA10T- and
Erd.EsxHWT-elicited CD8 T cells recognize H37Rv- and
Erd.EsxHWT-infected macrophages similarly, only
Erd.EsxHA10T-elicited CD8 T cells recognized
Erd.EsxHA10T-infected macrophages. This loss of recognition by
Erd.EsxHWT-elicited CD8 T cells instead of a gain of recognition by
Erd.EsxHA10T-elicited CD8 T cells suggest a more complicated
interpretation. There are likely to be other decoy antigens that become dominant
when the response to TB10.4 is abrogated. A strong candidate is
Mtb32a309-318. Despite the greater Mtb32a309-318-specific
CD8 T cell response after Erd.EsxHA10T infection, there is no greater
recognition of infected macrophages. The discrepancy between the frequency of CD8 T
cells that recognize Mtb32a309-318 vs. infected macrophages suggests that
Mtb32a309-318 might be a decoy antigen. While
Erd.EsxHA10T- and Erd.EsxHWT-elicited CD8 T cells recognize
H37Rv- and Erd.EsxHWT-infected macrophages similarly, the repertoire of
antigens recognized might be different. Such a difference could give rise to the
discrepancy in the recognition of Erd.EsxHA10T-infected macrophages. In
addition, we don’t know whether the CD8 T cells elicited by Erd.EsxHWT
and Erd.EsxHA10T are similar. We measure their IFNγ response, but there
could be other CD8 T cells that are recognizing infected macrophages but not making
IFNγ [32]. Other
possibilities include global effects on T cell priming or antigen presentation.
Clearly, the mechanistic basis for these changes is more complex than we had
originally envisioned.We wished to understand why the A10T amino acid substitution abrogated the
TB10.4-specific CD8 T cell response, particularly when the variant epitope could
bind and be recognized by CD8 T cells. As EsxH inhibits class II MHC antigen
presentation [33], we
hypothesized that that the A10T polymorphism altered EsxH protein function and
affected class I MHC presentation. While we did not formally address this
hypothesis, we found that the A10T polymorphism altered the processing of epitope as
revealed by in vitro degradation assays. Thus, the
IMYNYPTM epitope was more rapidly degraded, which
provides a mechanism for why, despite its potential to bind to Kb and be
recognized by CD8 T cells, this variant epitope is largely non-immunogenic. These
results provide an example of how the recognition of peptide-pulsed APC and
Mtb-infected cells can be discordant.We previously proposed that TB10.4 acts as a decoy antigen by eliciting an
immunodominant CD8 T cell response, which cannot recognize infected macrophages
[9]. Our new results are
consistent with the immunodominance of the CD8 T cell response to TB10.4 arising by
immunodomination. Immunodomination is the suppression of subdominant CD8 T cell
responses by an immunodominant CD8 T cell response and develops because of
competition for APC [16-21]. By ablating the
immunogenicity of the TB10.44−11 epitope, the CD8 T cell response to
MTB32a becomes dominant, establishing that the TB10.4-specific CD8 T cell response
diminishes the expansion of CD8 T cells specific to other Mtb antigens. The
dramatically altered T cell response toward previously sub-dominant epitopes
establishes that immunodomination shapes the CD8 T cell response to Mtb. A future
area for investigation is to determine how competition for APC shapes the CD4 and
CD8 T cell responses to Mtb.A second prediction of our decoy hypothesis is that by eliminating the “decoy
antigen,” other CD8 T cell responses would expand, recognize Mtb-infected
macrophages, and mediate protection. The altered CD8 T cell response, greater
bacterial control, and prolonged survival of mice infected with 667 compared to
Erdman was consistent with this hypothesis. Proving that this difference was due to
an altered CD8 T cell response could have pursued by infecting CD8-deficient mouse
strains (e.g., CD8a KO). However, as there are ~1700 snps between 667 and Erdman, we
focused on the isogenic Erdman strains. As C57BL/6 mice controlled
Erd.EsxHA10T and Erd.EsxHWT infection similarly, the
differences in bacterial burden and survival after Erdman and 667 infection cannot
be attributed to the EsxHA10T polymorphism. While there were no
differences in CFU, the altered CD8 T cell response could have affected lung
inflammation. Qualitatively, no differences in lung histopathology was observed 19
wpi, although quantitative criteria were not used to assess potential differences.
We did not observe that reducing the TB10.44−11 response resulted in
better recognition of infected macrophages or increased protection in
vivo. We do not yet know whether the MTB32a epitope is presented by
Mtb-infected macrophages or whether the compensatory emergence of new dominant CD8 T
cell responses also behaves as a decoy response. This possible redundancy in
immunodominance and decoy antigens would not be surprising given the long
evolutionary history of mycobacteria with the mammalian host, and the need for decoy
antigens that would be presented by numerous HLA alleles.Two distinct pressures affect the genetic evolution of human pathogens: 1) growth and
replication; and 2) host immunity. The first leads to conservation of essential
functional genes (e.g., metabolism and biosynthesis); the latter selects for
microbes that can evade host immunity. Interestingly, many Mtb antigens that are
recognized by human T cells are genetically conserved, implying that preserving T
cell recognition of mycobacterial proteins contributes to bacterial fitness during
human infection. Other mycobacterial genes that encode T cell antigens are
polymorphic across different clinical isolates and lineages, and these may reflect
an evolutionary response to immune pressure. Thus, the genetic heterogeneity among
clinical Mtb isolates from TB patients could drive diverse T cell responses. The
protein sequences of Mtb antigens used in vaccines are largely based on the H37Rv
lab strain, and immune responses to vaccines and after infection, may be more
heterogenous than previously expected. Ultimately, the A10T polymorphism, and maybe
other SNPs in the esxH gene, acts as a CD8 T cell response
regulator that shapes immunodominance by altering the function of TB10.4, through
its interaction with vacuolar trafficking machinery [33], its regulation of metal ions [24] or its proteolysis (this
manuscript). As esxH polymorphisms are focused in lineage 1 (L1),
the geographical clustering of both Mtb L1 and MHC could be a manifestation of T
cell pressure that promotes variation and ongoing immune evasion [34]. However, as genetic
modification of an L4 lineage strain (i.e., Erd.EsxHA10T) was sufficient
to the change the hierarchy of immune responses, the mechanism we describe should be
relevant to all Mtb lineages.Here we uncover a hierarchy of CD8 immune responses that appears to be established by
immunodomination. We show that a single nucleotide polymorphism in the Mtb genome
alters the CD8 T cell hierarchy in C57BL/6J mice and shifts the focus of the
immunodominant response from TB10.4 to MTB32a. By focusing the CD8 T cell response
on a decoy antigen such as TB10.4, Mtb accomplishes two things. First, the dominant
CD8 T cell response is one that is unable to recognize Mtb-infected macrophages, and
therefore, cannot mediate optimal protection. Second, the presumed presentation of
TB10.4 by uninfected cells could promote inflammation and create an environment that
promotes bacillary transmission [35, 36]. We find
that the A10T polymorphisms alter the processing of the TB10.44−11
epitope such that its abundance is diminished. Thus, not only is there less epitope
available for T cell priming, but the effective abundance of Mtb peptide/MHCI
complexes is likely to be below the activation threshold of CD8 T cells. These data
are of great practical significance as they show how polymorphisms between
circulating Mtb strains in a community, and BCG or H37Rv sequence-based vaccines
could lead to a mismatch between the T cells that are primed by the vaccine and the
epitopes presented by infected cells. Thus, there is uncertainty about whether
antigens that are evolutionarily conserved versus those that are highly polymorphic
should be incorporated into vaccines. Ultimately, an important goal is to identify
the epitopes presented by Mtb-infected cells and to determine whether these Mtb
antigens elicit protective T cells. This approach can provide a roadmap for rational
vaccine design.
Materials and methods
Ethics statement
Studies were conducted using the relevant guidelines and regulations, and
approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of
Massachusetts Medical School (UMMS) (Animal Welfare A3306-01), using the
recommendations from the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the
National Institutes of Health and the Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare.
Animals
C57BL/6J, BALB/c and CB6F1 mice were purchased from Jackson Laboratories (Bar
Harbor, ME) and housed under specific pathogen-free conditions at UMMS. Mice
were 8 to 9 weeks old at the start of all experiments. Infected mice were housed
in biosafety level 3 facilities under specific pathogen-free conditions at
UMMS.
Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains
Unless indicated, the Erdman strain was used for in vivo
infections, and the H37Rv strain was used for in vitro
infections. Erd.EsxHWT and Erd.EsxHA10T were generated as
described below. The ΔesxH strain was a gift from Dr. Jennifer Philips
(Washington University at St. Louis) [24, 33]. The barcoded clinical isolate pool was
provided by Dr. Sarah Fortune (Harvard University) [27].
Mouse infections
Eight- to nine-week old female mice were infected by the aerosol route. Frozen
bacterial stocks were thawed, diluted in 0.9% NaCl with 0.02% Tween80, and
sonicated before loading into a nebulizer for Glas-col aerosol chamber (Terre
Haute, IN) to deliver approximately 100 CFU to the lungs of each mouse. The
infecting dose was determined 16 hours after infection by plating lung
homogenates on 7H11 agar plates (Hardy Diagnosis). Lungs and spleens were also
aseptically removed, individually homogenized, and plated to determine viable
bacteria.
Preparation of cells
At different times post-infection, mice were euthanized, the lungs perfused with
10 mL of cold RPMI1640, and lung cell suspensions were prepared by coarse
dissociation using the GentleMACS tissue dissociator (Miltenyi Biotec, Germany).
Tissue was digested for 30 min at 37°C with 250 U/mL collagenase (Sigma) in
RPMI1640 supplemented with 10 mM HEPES, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 2 mM L-glutamine
(all from Invitrogen Life Technologies, ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA) and 10%
heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (HyClone, GE Healthcare Life Sciences,
Pittsburgh, PA). The tissue was further homogenized in the GentleMACS
dissociator and sequential straining through 70 μm and 40 μm nylon cell
strainers (Falcon). Pulmonary T cells were purified by positive selection using
anti-CD90.2 microbeads on AutoMACS (Miltenyi Biotec, Germany).
Thioglycolate-elicited peritoneal macrophages were obtained 4–5 days after
intraperitoneal injection of donor mice with 3% thioglycolate solution [37]. CD11b microbeads
(Miltenyi, Biotec, Germany) were used to purify the macrophages.
Peptides
We used the Immune Epitope Database tools to predict differences between the
variant TB10 peptide epitopes ability to bind H-2 Kb [38]. The WT
(IMYNYPAM), negative control
(IMANAPAM),
Mtb32a309-318 (GAPINSATAM) and ESAT61-15
(MTEQQWNFAGIEAAA) peptides were synthesized by New England Peptides (Gardner,
MA). Variant peptides A10T, A10V, P9S, and M11I were synthesized by Genscript
(Piscataway, NJ). The TB10.4 peptide library was obtained from BEI
Resources.
RMA-S assay
RMA-S cells were provided by Dr. Lawrence Stern laboratory (UMMS, Worcester MA).
Titrated (100uM to 1pM) were added to RMA-S cells (5x104/well) and
cultured overnight at 27C in 5% CO2. The cells were the shifted to
37C for 1–2 hours, and then their surface expression of Kb was
analyzed by flow cytometry.
Measurement of T cell proliferation
Purified T cells were labeled with the cell proliferation dye eFluor450
(eBiosciences). Dye dilution was used as a measure of T cell proliferation,
which was determined 72 hrs after co-culture with peptide-pulsed APC, by flow
cytometry.
In vitro infection
Frozen aliquots of Mtb were thawed, grown in 7H9 media until log-phase with an
OD600 of 0.6–1, washed, opsonized with TB coat (RPMI 1640, 1% heat-inactivated
FBS, 2% human serum, 0.05% Tween-80) and filtered (5μm) as previously described
[9]. After manual
counting, the bacteria were added to macrophages on UpCell Nunc plate (Thermo
Fisher Scientific, MA) at the desired multiplicity of infection (MOI) and
co-incubated overnight. The macrophages were subsequently washed and enumerated
by trypan blue. The actual MOI was determined by lysing macrophages in replicate
wells at final concentration of 1% (v/v) Triton X-100 and plating serial
dilutions. CFU were enumerated after 21 days.
The MIM-ICS assay was performed as described. Briefly, TGPMs were infected
overnight, recovered, and plated (105/well). 10 μM peptides and
uninfected TGPMs were used as controls. Purified T cells from Mtb-infected mice
were added and a standard ICS protocol was used [30].
Peptide library screening
At the indicated timepoints, lungs and spleens were obtained from infected mice
and single cell suspensions prepared. Each peptide in the library or control
peptides (10 uM) were added to 105 lung cells/well in triplicate.
After 48 hours in 5% CO2 at 37C, supernatants were filtered (0.2 μm) and IFNγ
measured by ELISA (Biolegend, CA).
Flow cytometry
Samples were fixed with 1% paraformaldehyde in PBS for >1 hr before analysis
with a MACSQuant flow cytometer (Miltenyi Biotec). FlowJo Software (Tree Star,
Portland, OR) was used for data analysis. Single lymphocytes were gated by
forward scatter versus height and side scatter for size and granularity, and
dead cells were excluded. Cells were stained with Zombie Violet or Aqua Fixable
viability dye, and the antibodies to: CD4 (GK1.5), CD8 (53–6.7), CD3ε
(145-2C11), CD19 (6D5), CD44 (IM7), CD62L (MEL-14), CD127 (A7R34), KLRG1
(2F1/KLRG1), CD69 (H1.2F3), IFNγ (XMG1.2), F4/80 (BM8) and H-2 Kb
(AF6-88.5) (all from Biolegend). Tetramers were obtained from the National
Institutes of Health Tetramer Core Facility (Emory University Vaccine Center,
Atlanta, GA).
Barcoded clinical isolate pool infection
Barcoded Mtb strain generation, infection, and analysis were previously described
[39]. Briefly,
selected clinical isolates were individually tagged with unique 8 basepair
sequence, grown to log phase, pooled, and used for intravenous infection at
1x106 Mtb per mouse. At indicated time post infection, lungs and
spleens were harvested, homogenized and plated on 7H10 supplemented with oleic
albumin dextrose catalase (OADC) and 20 ng/ml kanamycin. After 3 weeks of
incubation, the plates were counted for CFU, and colonies were scraped for
genomic DNA extraction and sequencing by NextSeq and analysis using Python.
Generation of isogenic Erd.EsxHWT and Erd.EsxHA10T by
oligo recombineering
Oligo recombineering with long oligo containing desired base pair change were
generated as described previously [40, 41]. Erdman was grown in 7H9 broth in log
phase before electroporation of the pKM444 plasmid containing RecT annealase.
Electroporated strains were selected on 7H10 agar plates containing 20 ng/ml
kanamycin, and PCR used to verify the presence of pKM444 plasmid. An Erdman
strain containing the Che9 phage RecT-producing plasmid was grown in 7H9 broth
to an OD of 0.5. Anhydrotetracycline (Atc, final concentration, 500 ng/ml) was
added to induce expression of RecT from the PTet promoter. The cells
were grown overnight and prepared for electroporation with
esxHA10T-conferring oligo (1 ug) and an oligo targeting the
rpsL gene (0.1 ug) designed to generate a K43R mutation in
the RpsL protein, which confers resistance to streptomycin. Following outgrowth,
the culture was plated on 7H10 agar plates containing 20 ng/ml streptomycin.
Selection of streptomycin screens for cells that pick up the DNA and are
recombinogenic, increasing the frequency of finding the desired SNP. Candidate
colonies were picked and screened for the targeted change by PCR analysis.
In vitro epitope processing assay and mass spectrometry analysis
2 nmol of pure peptide (Biosynthesis, TX) was degraded with 15 ug of mouse
macrophage or BMDC extracts at 37C in pH4 degradation buffer as described [42]. Aliquots were taken at
various time points and the reaction was stopped by addition of 5% (v/v) of
Formic acid (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA) and the degradation products were
purified by trifluoroacetic acid (Sigma-Aldrich, MO) precipitation (final
concentration 5% (v/v)) and identified by in-house mass spectrometry as
previously described [43]. Briefly, equal amounts of the purified degradation products were
injected into a NanoLC Ultra-HPLC (Eksigent) for salt removal and separation,
then online nanosprayed into an LTQ Orbitrap Discovery mass spectrometer (Thermo
Fisher Scientific, MA) for identification. Peptides were separated in a NanoLC
column (ChromXP C18, 3 um 120Å; Eksigent) over a gradient of 2–60% buffer B
(buffer A: 0.1% (v/v) formic acid in MS-grade water (Fisher Scientific, NH);
buffer B: 0.1% (v/v) formic acid in MS-grade acetonitrile (Fisher Scientific,
NH) in 95 min with a conserved flow rate of 250 nl/min. Mass spectra were
recorded in the 370–2000 Daltons range. In the tandem mass spectrometry mode,
the eight most intense peaks were selected with a window of 1 Dalton and
fragmented using helium as collision gas and a voltage of 35 V. Peaks in the
mass spectra were searched against the source peptide databases with Proteome
Discoverer (version 1.3; Thermo) and quantitatively analyzed. For a given
peptide, the integrated area under the peak is proportional to the relative
abundance of the peptide in the sample. Each sample was run on the mass
spectrometer at least twice.
Statistical analysis
Data are represented as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). For comparing
two groups, A two-tailed, unpaired student’s t-test was used to compare two
groups; a one-way ANOVA was used for >2 groups. A p value < 0.05 was
considered significant. Analyses were performed using Prism (GraphPad Software,
La Jolla, CA).
The altered CD8 T cell hierarchy induced by 667 infection is stable over
time.
The total number of (A) TB10.44−11-specific, or (B)
MTB32a309-318-specific, CD8 T cells in the lungs of Erdman-
or 667-infected mice detected using tetramers during the course of Mtb
infection. Each point represents an individually analyzed mouse. (C) The
proportion of tetramer-specific and other CD8 T cells that expressed KLRG1
or CD127. Closed bars, Erdman infection; open bars, 667 infection. Black,
TB10-specific CD8 T cells; purple, MTB32a-specific CD8 T cells; teal, total
CD8s after exclusion of TB10- and MTB32a-specific CD8s.(PDF)Click here for additional data file.
IMYNYPTM-loaded tetramers verify the loss of
TB10.44−11-specific CD8 T cells after 667 infection.
(A) Competitive tetramer staining was performed using H-2Kb/
WTTB10.44−11 and H-2Kb/
A10TTB10.44−11 tetramers labelled with different
fluorochromes in a single stain to assess the relative avidity of the
responding CD8 T cells. CD8 T cells elicited by Erdman infection only bind
the WTTB10.44−11/Kb tetramer indicating
that their avidity for the WT epitope is greater than for the A10T variant.
In contrast, CD8 T cells elicited by 667 bind better to the A10T tetramer
but are also recognized by the WT tetramer. (B) Conventional tetramer
staining of CD8 T cells elicited by Erdman (left) or 667 (right) infections,
and stained with the H-2Kb/ WTTB10.44−11
(top row) or H-2Kb/ A10TTB10.44−11 (bottom
row) tetramer, both in combination with the
H-2Kb/MTB32a309-318 tetramer (Y axis). Cells were
gated by size, viability, and lymphocyte gate before finally gating on the
CD8 T cell population.(PDF)Click here for additional data file.
No new TB10.4 epitopes were detected in the absence of the
TB10.44−11-specific CD8 T cell response.
To detect whether any new epitopes of TB10.4 emerge following 667 infection,
single cell lung suspensions from Erdman- or 667-infected (A) C57BL/6; (B)
BALB/c; or (C) CB6F1 mice were incubated with peptides from a TB10.4 peptide
library (21 peptides of 15mers overlapping 11 amino acids; also see S2
Table) and the indicated control peptides. Supernatants were
collected after 48 hours and IFNγ production was detected by ELISA. Three
strains of mice were used to identify whether the A10T polymorphism affects
the production of T cells specific to TB10.44−11 (Kb
restricted; e.g., C57BL/6), TB10.420−28 (Kd
restricted) or TB10.474−88 is (I-Ad restricted) (e.g.,
BALB/c). The F1 mouse was used to address whether any difference in the
immunogenicity of TB10.44−11 and TB10.420−28 was
modulated by host genetics. In this experiment, the 667-infected mice appear
to have a greater IFNγ response induced by the ESAT-6 epitope. We observed
variability in the ESAT6 response in these experiments but after several
experiments concluded that these differences were not reproducible. The
variability may depend on the type of assay used. For example, the number of
ESAT6-specific tetramer+ cells in the lungs of Erdman and 667 infected mice
is virtually indistinguishable (Fig 2D). The peptide screening used total lung cells (as opposed
to purified T cells), which prevents us from normalizing the abundance of
CD4 and CD8 T cells in each sample, which is routinely done in flow
cytometry experiments by specifically gating on the T cells as is done in
the flow experiments. Additionally, the exogenous peptides are not the only
source of antigen as there are endogenous APC that are infected.
Alternately, APC may secrete IL-12 and IL-18, which could drive
antigen-independent IFNγ production. However, since this experiment is
designed to identify new positive responses (e.g., cryptic epitopes); and
not differences between the two strains, we believe that this experimental
design is valid. Finally, another reason that the ESAT-6 induced IFNγ
responses differs from the tetramer number is that the ESAT6/I-Ab
tetramers may only stain a subset of the total ESAT6-specific T cells (e.g.,
high avidity)(for more discussion of this issue see Patankar et al, Mucosal
Immunology 2019).(PDF)Click here for additional data file.
Similar CD8 T cell responses are elicited by 667 and Erdman infection in
BALB/c mice.
The frequency of Kd-restricted CD8 T cells specific for
TB10.420−28 and I-Ad-restricted CD4 T cells
specific for TB10.474−88 were measured using tetramers after Mtb
infection. Infected BALB/c mice were analyzed at 5 weeks post-infection with
~100 aerosolized Erdman or 667. (A) Representative flow cytometry plots of
TB10.474−88-specific CD4 T cells (top row), or
TB10.420−28-specific and EspA150-158-specific CD8
T cells (bottom row) following Erdman (left) or 667 (right). The percentages
(B) and the total cell numbers (C) of tetramer specific cells from the lungs
of BALB/c mice. The similar CD4 T cell response to the
TB10.474−88 epitope after 667 or Erdman infection makes it
unlikely that the failure of 667 to elicit TB10.4-specific CD8 T cells is
because the polymorphic TB10.4 protein (i.e., A10T) is less stable or
abundant. Similarly, Erdman elicited a comparable
TB10.420−28-specific CD8 T cell response in BALB/c mice to 667
infection. These data suggest that the changes in the immunogenicity of
TB10.44−11 is due to an epitope specific effect, and not a
change that affects the global CD8 T cell response. Similarly, we examined
an independent epitope recognized by CD8 T cells after Mtb infection and
found that both 667 and Erdman elicited similar frequencies of
EspA150-158-specific CD8 T cells. Thus, the CD8 T cell
response elicited in BALB/c mice does not appear to be affected by the
polymorphisms present in 667, based on quantification of the response to
EspA150-158 or TB10.420−28. These data are
representative of three different independent experiments. Statistical
testing performed using a one-way ANOVA. ns, non-significant.(PDF)Click here for additional data file.
Generation of Erd.EsxHWT and Erd.EsxHA10T isogenic
strains.
(A) Schematic representation of oligo recombineering method to generate
isogenic strains. (B) RT-PCR was used to determine Mtb antigen gene
expression by Erdman, the two isogenic strains created by recombineering,
Erd.EsxHWT and Erd.EsxHA10T, and the clinical
isolate 667, all after growth in 7H9 media. Relative expression was measured
in comparison to the 16S ribosomal RNA housekeeping gene and normalized to
the non-genetically modified Erdman strain (i.e., Erdman).(PDF)Click here for additional data file.
Infection with the Erd.EsxHWT and Erd.EsxHA10T
isogenic strains does not alter the antigen-specific CD4 and CD8 T cells
response in BALB/c mice.
Infected BALB/c mice were analyzed at 5 weeks post-infection with ~100
aerosolized Erd.EsxHWT or Erd.EsxHA10T isogenic
strains. (A) Representative flow cytometry plots of
TB10.420−28-specific and EspA150-158-specific CD8 T
cells (top row), or TB10.474−88-specific and Ag85A-specific CD4 T
cells (bottom row) following Erd.EsxHWT (left) or
Erd.EsxHA10T (right). The percentages (B) and the total cell
numbers (C) of tetramer specific cells from the lungs of BALB/c mice. Here,
the CD8 T cell response elicited in BALB/c mice does not appear to be
affected by the polymorphisms present in Erd.EsxHA10T, based on
quantification of the response to EspA150-158 or
TB10.420−28. These data are representative of three
independent experiments. None of the comparisons between 667 and Erdman
infected mice were significantly different based on statistical analysis
performed using a one-way ANOVA. ns, not significant.(PDF)Click here for additional data file.
667 and Erdman, and Erd.EsxHWT and Erd.EsxHA10T infect
macrophages similarly.
After monoinfection, bacterial loads were lower and survival was longer after
667 infection compared to Erdman in C57BL/6 mice. This raises the
possibility that the uptake of 667 by macrophages differs from Erdman. Our
competition experiment (Fig
3) shows that 667 and Erdman are similarly fit in the spleens of
T cell deficient mouse (i.e., RAG ko), and both are controlled by adaptive
immunity (i.e., in C57BL/6 mice). There did appear to be a difference in
fitness in the lung that we did not explore. When performing in
vitro macrophage infections, 667 and Erdman appeared to infect
macrophages similarly (A). We determined the actual MOI after each
in vitro infection by lysing infected macrophages and
plating serial dilutions of the lysate. By this measure, the MOI of Erdman
and 667 was very similar, and any differences were more likely due to
differences in counting the bacteria before infection, rather than
differences in uptake or intracellular growth. We performed similar
experiments to compare Erd.EsxHWT and Erd.EsxHA10T and
observed they also had a similar ability to infect macrophages (B).
Statistical analysis by a paired t-test showed that the difference in MOI
was not significant (A,B).(PDF)Click here for additional data file.
T cell recognition of macrophages infected with EsxH-deficient compared
to EsxH-expressing Mtb strains.
CD4 (left) or CD8 (right) T cells purified from the lungs of Erdman-infected
mice were cultured with ΔesxH-infected (pink) or
esxH-complemented
ΔesxH (ie.
ΔesxH::WT)-infected (teal) macrophages and
the MIM-ICS assay was performed. The X axis is the actual multiplicity of
infection (MOI) as determined by CFU plating. Results are representative of
two different experiments. Each data point is an average result from 5
individual mice.(PDF)Click here for additional data file.
Peptide stabilization of Kb expressed by RMA-S cells.
Normalized and fitted data from Fig 6A.using the ECanything nonlinear regression model (Prism 8)
to fit the curves. By setting F = 50, the IC50 was determined for each data
set. The points are the experimental data, the solid lines are the fitted
line, and the dashed lines are the 95% confidence intervals. This experiment
was repeated four times with similar results.(PDF)Click here for additional data file.
Different peptide degradation patterns of TB10.41−34 with
alanine or threonine at position 10 in BMDC extracts.
(A) Experiment scheme of the in vitro peptide degradation
assay in bone-marrow derived dendritic cells lysosomal extracts. (B) N
(left) and C (right) terminus cleavage sites determined at 60 minutes. The
relative amount of peptides starting (left) or ending (right) at each
residue was quantified during the degradation of WT (closed) and A10T (open)
TB10.4-1-34-mer peptides. N = 6 experiments; stars p<0.05. (C) Production
of TB10.44−11 epitope (left) and N-extended IM8 (right) from WT
(closed) or A10T 34-mer (open) at 60 minutes. One representative experiment.
(D) Production of TB10.44−11 epitope from WT (closed) and A10T
(open) TB10.4-1-34-mer peptides was determined at 10, 30, 60 minutes in N =
6 independent experiments. P values calculated with Wilcoxon matched-pairs
signed rank test.(PDF)Click here for additional data file.
Identification of esxH nonsynonymous polymorphisms among
clinical isolates.
The number of each polymorphism was indicated among different Mtb lineages
with the number of independent occurrences of each polymorphism in
parentheses.(PDF)Click here for additional data file.
Peptide sequences used in this study.
(PDF)Click here for additional data file.
Predicted processing efficiency and binding affinity to H2-Kb
of polymorphic TB10.44−11 epitopes.
Bold letters indicate polymorphic substitution.(PDF)Click here for additional data file.
Authors: Patricia A Darrah; Diane L Bolton; Andrew A Lackner; Deepak Kaushal; Pyone Pyone Aye; Smriti Mehra; James L Blanchard; Peter J Didier; Chad J Roy; Srinivas S Rao; David A Hokey; Charles A Scanga; Donata R Sizemore; Jerald C Sadoff; Mario Roederer; Robert A Seder Journal: J Immunol Date: 2014-07-14 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Scott G Hansen; Daniel E Zak; Guangwu Xu; Julia C Ford; Emily E Marshall; Daniel Malouli; Roxanne M Gilbride; Colette M Hughes; Abigail B Ventura; Emily Ainslie; Kurt T Randall; Andrea N Selseth; Parker Rundstrom; Lauren Herlache; Matthew S Lewis; Haesun Park; Shannon L Planer; John M Turner; Miranda Fischer; Christina Armstrong; Robert C Zweig; Joseph Valvo; Jackie M Braun; Smitha Shankar; Lenette Lu; Andrew W Sylwester; Alfred W Legasse; Martin Messerle; Michael A Jarvis; Lynn M Amon; Alan Aderem; Galit Alter; Dominick J Laddy; Michele Stone; Aurelio Bonavia; Thomas G Evans; Michael K Axthelm; Klaus Früh; Paul T Edlefsen; Louis J Picker Journal: Nat Med Date: 2018-01-15 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Arati B Kamath; Joshua Woodworth; Xiaowei Xiong; Chad Taylor; Yu Weng; Samuel M Behar Journal: J Exp Med Date: 2004-11-22 Impact factor: 14.307
Authors: Randi Vita; Swapnil Mahajan; James A Overton; Sandeep Kumar Dhanda; Sheridan Martini; Jason R Cantrell; Daniel K Wheeler; Alessandro Sette; Bjoern Peters Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2019-01-08 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Lin Wang; Emmanuel Asare; Amol C Shetty; Freddy Sanchez-Tumbaco; Megan R Edwards; Rajagopalan Saranathan; Brian Weinrick; Jiayong Xu; Bing Chen; Angèle Bénard; Gordon Dougan; Daisy W Leung; Gaya K Amarasinghe; John Chan; Christopher F Basler; William R Jacobs; JoAnn M Tufariello Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2022-02-22 Impact factor: 12.779
Authors: Yu-Jung Lu; Palmira Barreira-Silva; Shayla Boyce; Jennifer Powers; Kelly Cavallo; Samuel M Behar Journal: Cell Rep Date: 2021-09-14 Impact factor: 9.423