Literature DB >> 33074912

Timing of Prenatal Care Initiation and Psychological Wellbeing in Black Women.

Ana C Wong1, Brooke Rengers, Alexandra L Nowak, Samantha Schoeppner, Mercedes Price, Liying Zhang, Rhonda K Dailey, Cindy M Anderson, Dawn P Misra, Carmen Giurgescu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to see if timing of prenatal care initiation was related to psychological wellbeing of Black women. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Using a cross-sectional design, a sample of 197 pregnant Black women completed a self-reported survey between 8 weeks and less than 30 weeks gestation as part of the Biosocial Impact on Black Births study. The questions asked about the initiation of prenatal care, perceived stress, depressive symptoms, and psychological wellbeing. Multiple linear regression was used to examine if timing of prenatal care initiation was related to psychological variables.
RESULTS: Sixty-three women (32%) reported they were not able to initiate their first prenatal care visit as early as they wanted due to various barriers. After adjusting for cofounders, not initiating prenatal care as early as women wanted predicted lower levels of psychological wellbeing. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Perinatal nurses should assess psychological wellbeing in Black women throughout pregnancy; advocate for Black women who report high levels of stress, psychological distress, or depressive symptoms for further mental health evaluation by their health care provider; and provide resources and education (e.g., support groups, counseling) for these women.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33074912      PMCID: PMC8021011          DOI: 10.1097/NMC.0000000000000661

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs        ISSN: 0361-929X            Impact factor:   1.412


  9 in total

1.  Mood and Anxiety Disorders in Pregnant and Postpartum Women.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2015-06-30

2.  Disparity in posttraumatic stress disorder diagnosis among African American pregnant women.

Authors:  Julia S Seng; Laura P Kohn-Wood; Melnee D McPherson; Mickey Sperlich
Journal:  Arch Womens Ment Health       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 3.  Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis.

Authors:  S Cohen; T A Wills
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 4.  A tale of two pregnancies: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis of women's perceptions about delayed initiation of antenatal care.

Authors:  Rosalind Haddrill; Georgina L Jones; Dilly Anumba; Caroline Mitchell
Journal:  Women Birth       Date:  2017-10-14       Impact factor: 3.172

5.  Births: Final Data for 2018.

Authors:  Joyce A Martin; Brady E Hamilton; Michelle J K Osterman; Anne K Driscoll
Journal:  Natl Vital Stat Rep       Date:  2019-11

6.  A global measure of perceived stress.

Authors:  S Cohen; T Kamarck; R Mermelstein
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1983-12

7.  African American and Latino patient versus provider perceptions of determinants of prenatal care initiation.

Authors:  Allan A Johnson; Barbara D Wesley; M Nabil El-Khorazaty; Julie M Utter; Brinda Bhaskar; Barbara J Hatcher; Renee Milligan; Barbara K Wingrove; Leslie Richards; Margaret F Rodan; Haziel A Laryea
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2011-12

8.  Time of pregnancy recognition and prenatal care use: a population-based study in the United States.

Authors:  Adejoke B Ayoola; Mary D Nettleman; Manfred Stommel; Renee B Canady
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.689

9.  The influence of personal and group racism on entry into prenatal care among African American women.

Authors:  Jaime C Slaughter-Acey; Cleopatra H Caldwell; Dawn P Misra
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2013-09-14
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.