Literature DB >> 33074711

Threshold Values for Success After Hip Arthroscopy Using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Assessment: Determining the Minimum Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State.

Benjamin D Kuhns1, John Reuter1, David Lawton1, Raymond J Kenney1, Judith F Baumhauer1, Brian D Giordano1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Threshold values for patient-reported outcome measures, such as the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS), are important for relating postoperative outcomes to meaningful functional improvement.
PURPOSE: To determine the PASS and MCID after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) questionnaire. STUDY
DESIGN: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3.
METHODS: A consecutive series of patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement were administered preoperative and minimum 1-year postoperative PROMIS surveys focusing on physical function (PF) and pain interference (PI). External anchor questions for the MCID and PASS were given with the postoperative PROMIS survey. Receiver operator curves were constructed to determine the threshold values for the MCID and PASS. Curves were generated for the study population as well as separate cohorts segregated by median baseline PF or PI scores and preoperative athletic participation. A multivariate post hoc analysis was then constructed to evaluate factors associated with achieving the PASS or MCID.
RESULTS: There were 113 patients (35% male; mean ± SD age, 32.8 ± 12.5 years; body mass index, 25.8 ± 4.8 kg/m2), with 60 (53%) reporting preoperative athletic participation. Survey time averaged 77.5 ± 49.2 seconds. Anchor-based MCID values were 5.1 and 10.9 for the PF and PI domains, respectively. PASS thresholds were 51.8 and 51.9 for the PF and PI, respectively. PASS values were not affected by baseline scores, but athletic patients had a higher PASS threshold than did those not participating in a sport (53.1 vs 44.7). MCID values were affected by preoperative baseline scores but were largely independent of sports participation. A post hoc analysis found that 94 (83%) patients attained the MCID PF while 66 (58%) attained the PASS PF. A multivariate nominal logistic regression found that younger patients (P = .01) and athletic patients (P = .003) were more likely to attain the PASS.
CONCLUSION: The PROMIS survey is an efficient metric to evaluate preoperative disability and postoperative function after primary hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement. The MCID and PASS provide surgeons with threshold values to help determine PROMIS scores that are clinically meaningful to patients, and they can assist with therapeutic decision making as well as expectation setting.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PROMIS; hip arthroscopy; minimum clinically important difference; patient acceptable symptomatic state; patient-reported outcomes

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33074711     DOI: 10.1177/0363546520960461

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  4 in total

1.  Rate of continued conservative management versus progression to surgery at minimum 1-year follow-up in patients with pre-arthritic hip pain.

Authors:  Abby L Cheng; Reid W Collis; Andrea B McCullough; Mary Bui; Brian K Brady; Matthew J Schuelke; John C Clohisy; Graham A Colditz; Heidi Prather
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 2.218

2.  Depression and anxiety are associated with worse baseline function in hip arthroscopy patients.

Authors:  Samir Kaveeshwar; Michael P Rocca; Brittany A Oster; Matheus B Schneider; Andrew Tran; Matthew P Kolevar; Farshad Adib; R Frank Henn; Sean J Meredith
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 4.114

3.  Diagnostic intra-articular injection with provocative functional testing predicts patient-reported outcomes following hip arthroscopy: a prospective investigation.

Authors:  Brittany E Haws; Chad G Condidorio; Kelly L Adler; Brian D Giordano
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2022-06-25

Review 4.  Minimal important change (MIC): a conceptual clarification and systematic review of MIC estimates of PROMIS measures.

Authors:  Caroline B Terwee; John Devin Peipert; Robert Chapman; Jin-Shei Lai; Berend Terluin; David Cella; Philip Griffith; Lidwine B Mokkink
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 4.147

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.