Kamil Litwinowicz1, Marcin Choroszy2, Anna Wróbel3. 1. Department of Medical Biochemistry, Wroclaw Medical University, ul. Chalubińskiego 10, 50-368, Wroclaw, Poland. kamil.litwinowicz@student.umed.wroc.pl. 2. Department of Microbiology, Wroclaw Medical University, ul. Chalubińskiego 4, 50-368, Wroclaw, Poland. 3. Department of Psychiatry, Wroclaw Medical University, Wybrzeze L. Pasteura 10, 50-367, Wroclaw, Poland.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Perineal pressure associated with bicycle riding is the cause of several genitourinary pathologies, most notably Alcock's syndrome and subsequent perineal numbness. The possible link between cycling-induced perineal numbness and erectile dysfunction makes the development of strategies for perineal protection in bicycle users critical. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of strategies for reducing the impact of cycling on the perineum in healthy males. METHODS: We have conducted a systematic review and a meta-analysis of studies examining various means of reducing the impact of cycling on the perineum under the PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: Out of 2217 screened studies, 22 met our inclusion criteria, and 6 qualified for meta-analysis. The strategies included various designs of saddles, changes in the cycling position, seat shock absorber, shorts with different padding, using the recumbent bike. Using the no-nose saddle and recumbent bike resulted in a significant reduction of perineal pressure and higher penile oxygen pressure compared with a standard saddle. Indirect evidence supports the protective effect of standing on the pedals every few minutes during cycling. More evidence is needed to support-or dismiss-other strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence supports the use of no-nose saddles as a mean to reduce the negative impact of cycling on the perineum in healthy males at the cost of worse stability and increase of posterior seat pressure. Standing on the pedals every ten minutes might be an effective and potentially widely applicable strategy. The use of a recumbent bike appears to protect the perineum, but several concerns prevent its widespread use.
INTRODUCTION: Perineal pressure associated with bicycle riding is the cause of several genitourinary pathologies, most notably Alcock's syndrome and subsequent perineal numbness. The possible link between cycling-induced perineal numbness and erectile dysfunction makes the development of strategies for perineal protection in bicycle users critical. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of strategies for reducing the impact of cycling on the perineum in healthy males. METHODS: We have conducted a systematic review and a meta-analysis of studies examining various means of reducing the impact of cycling on the perineum under the PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: Out of 2217 screened studies, 22 met our inclusion criteria, and 6 qualified for meta-analysis. The strategies included various designs of saddles, changes in the cycling position, seat shock absorber, shorts with different padding, using the recumbent bike. Using the no-nose saddle and recumbent bike resulted in a significant reduction of perineal pressure and higher penile oxygen pressure compared with a standard saddle. Indirect evidence supports the protective effect of standing on the pedals every few minutes during cycling. More evidence is needed to support-or dismiss-other strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence supports the use of no-nose saddles as a mean to reduce the negative impact of cycling on the perineum in healthy males at the cost of worse stability and increase of posterior seat pressure. Standing on the pedals every ten minutes might be an effective and potentially widely applicable strategy. The use of a recumbent bike appears to protect the perineum, but several concerns prevent its widespread use.