Literature DB >> 3307427

Early third-trimester ultrasound screening in gestational diabetes to determine the risk of macrosomia and labor dystocia at term.

C J Bochner, A L Medearis, J Williams, L Castro, C J Hobel, M E Wade.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine whether an early third-trimester fetal abdominal circumference measurement can be used in patients with gestational diabetes to predict the presence or absence of macrosomia and labor dystocia at term. The predictive accuracy of a 30- to 33-week abdominal circumference measurement was tested, using the ninetieth percentile as the discriminant point. The study consisted of 201 patients with gestational diabetes who maintained weekly fasting glucose levels less than 100 mg/dl and 2-hour postprandial glucose levels less than 120 mg/dl with dietary management alone. The predictive accuracy of a 30- to 33-week fetal abdominal circumference measurement was 96.4% for ruling out macrosomia and 56.3% for predicting macrosomia. Patients with fetal abdominal circumference measurements greater than the ninetieth percentile at 30 to 33 weeks had a significantly increased incidence of cesarean section for failure to progress, shoulder dystocia, and birth trauma, whereas patients with abdominal circumference measurements less than or equal to the ninetieth percentile were at no greater risk than the general population. These results suggest that patients with non-insulin-dependent gestational diabetes with fetal abdominal circumference measurements less than or equal to the ninetieth percentile at 30 to 33 weeks are not at increased risk for macrosomia, cesarean section, or birth trauma at term, as long as their weekly glucose testing remains within normal limits. Efforts to decrease the incidence of macrosomia and its attendant risks should focus on those gestational diabetic patients whose fetal abdominal circumference greater than the ninetieth percentile at 30 to 33 weeks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3307427     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(87)80033-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  9 in total

1.  Case 6-2020: A 34-Year-Old Woman with Hyperglycemia.

Authors:  Miriam S Udler; Camille E Powe; Christina A Austin-Tse
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Abnormal liver growth in utero and death from coronary heart disease.

Authors:  D J Barker; C N Martyn; C Osmond; G A Wield
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-03-18

3.  Diabetes in pregnancy.

Authors:  R Fraser
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 5.747

4.  Polyhydramnios or Excessive Fetal Growth Are Markers for Abnormal Perinatal Outcome in Euglycemic Pregnancies.

Authors:  Sarah Crimmins; Cecilia Mo; Yomna Nassar; Jerome N Kopelman; Ozhan M Turan
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Growth and endocrine function after near total pancreatectomy for hyperinsulinaemic hypoglycaemia.

Authors:  A T Soliman; I Alsalmi; A Darwish; M G Asfour
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 6.  Antepartum A1C, maternal diabetes outcomes, and selected offspring outcomes: an epidemiological review.

Authors:  Jodie Katon; Michelle A Williams; Gayle Reiber; Edith Miller
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 3.980

7.  Food taboos during pregnancy: meta-analysis on cross cultural differences suggests specific, diet-related pressures on childbirth among agriculturalists.

Authors:  Ornella Maggiulli; Fabrizio Rufo; Sarah E Johns; Jonathan C K Wells
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 3.061

8.  Early rapid growth, early birth: accelerated fetal growth and spontaneous late preterm birth.

Authors:  Michelle Lampl; Juan Pedro Kusanovic; Offer Erez; Jimmy Espinoza; Francesca Gotsch; Luis Goncalves; Sonia Hassan; Ricardo Gomez; Jyh Kae Nien; Edward A Frongillo; Roberto Romero
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.937

9.  How many sonograms are needed to reliably predict the absence of fetal overgrowth in gestational diabetes mellitus pregnancies?

Authors:  Ute M Schaefer-Graf; Luise Wendt; David A Sacks; Öemer Kilavuz; Bettina Gaber; Sabine Metzner; Klaus Vetter; Michael Abou-Dakn
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 19.112

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.