Adam G Horwitz1, Jacqueline Grupp-Phelan2, David Brent3, Bradley J Barney4, T Charles Casper4, Johnny Berona5, Lauren S Chernick6, Rohit Shenoi7, Mary Cwik8, Cheryl A King9. 1. University of Michigan, Department of Psychiatry, United States. Electronic address: ahor@umich.edu. 2. University of California San Francisco, Department of Emergency Medicine, United States. 3. University of Pittsburgh, Department of Psychiatry, United States. 4. University of Utah, Department of Pediatrics, United States. 5. University of Chicago, Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience Department, United States. 6. Columbia University, Department of Emergency Medicine, United States. 7. Baylor College of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, United States. 8. Johns Hopkins University, Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, United States. 9. University of Michigan, Department of Psychiatry, United States.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Differences in risk and protective factors (e.g., victimization, abuse, social support) have been used to explain elevated rates of suicidal ideation and suicide attempts in sexual minority youth (SMY) relative to heterosexual peers. However, little is known regarding how risk and protective factors may explain suicide risk differences among subgroups of SMY. The aims of this study were to 1) examine differences in prevalence and severity for suicide risk and protective factors among SMY, and 2) explore whether risk and protective factors are differentially associated with suicidal ideation and suicide attempts for SMY subgroups. METHODS: Participants were 6,423 adolescents (ages 12-17) recruited from 14 Emergency Departments across the United States who completed an assessment of suicide risk and protective factors. SMY were 20% of the sample (n = 1,275) and categorized as bisexual (8%), gay/lesbian (2%), mostly straight (5%), or other sexual minority (5%). RESULTS: Bisexual youth had elevated rates of suicidal ideation and attempts, more risk factors (e.g., bullying victimization, depression), and fewer protective factors (e.g., parent-family connectedness, positive affect) relative to mostly straight and other sexual minority youth. Bisexual and gay/lesbian youth only differed in parent-family connectedness (lower among bisexual youth). Depression and parent-family connectedness had weaker associations with suicidal ideation for bisexual youth. LIMITATIONS: Emergency departments were not nationally representative. Study design was cross-sectional, preventing causal inferences. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions seeking to mitigate risk factors and promote protective factors are greatly needed for SMY and may benefit from tailoring to address unique stressors for sexual minority subgroups.
BACKGROUND: Differences in risk and protective factors (e.g., victimization, abuse, social support) have been used to explain elevated rates of suicidal ideation and suicide attempts in sexual minority youth (SMY) relative to heterosexual peers. However, little is known regarding how risk and protective factors may explain suicide risk differences among subgroups of SMY. The aims of this study were to 1) examine differences in prevalence and severity for suicide risk and protective factors among SMY, and 2) explore whether risk and protective factors are differentially associated with suicidal ideation and suicide attempts for SMY subgroups. METHODS: Participants were 6,423 adolescents (ages 12-17) recruited from 14 Emergency Departments across the United States who completed an assessment of suicide risk and protective factors. SMY were 20% of the sample (n = 1,275) and categorized as bisexual (8%), gay/lesbian (2%), mostly straight (5%), or other sexual minority (5%). RESULTS: Bisexual youth had elevated rates of suicidal ideation and attempts, more risk factors (e.g., bullying victimization, depression), and fewer protective factors (e.g., parent-family connectedness, positive affect) relative to mostly straight and other sexual minority youth. Bisexual and gay/lesbian youth only differed in parent-family connectedness (lower among bisexual youth). Depression and parent-family connectedness had weaker associations with suicidal ideation for bisexual youth. LIMITATIONS: Emergency departments were not nationally representative. Study design was cross-sectional, preventing causal inferences. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions seeking to mitigate risk factors and promote protective factors are greatly needed for SMY and may benefit from tailoring to address unique stressors for sexual minority subgroups.
Authors: Nancy D Brener; Laura Kann; Steven A Kinchen; Jo Anne Grunbaum; Laura Whalen; Danice Eaton; Joseph Hawkins; James G Ross Journal: MMWR Recomm Rep Date: 2004-09-24
Authors: Lisa M Horowitz; Jeffrey A Bridge; Stephen J Teach; Elizabeth Ballard; Jennifer Klima; Donald L Rosenstein; Elizabeth A Wharff; Katherine Ginnis; Elizabeth Cannon; Paramjit Joshi; Maryland Pao Journal: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med Date: 2012-12
Authors: Michael P Marshal; Laura J Dietz; Mark S Friedman; Ron Stall; Helen A Smith; James McGinley; Brian C Thoma; Pamela J Murray; Anthony R D'Augelli; David A Brent Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2011-05-26 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Travis Salway Hottes; Laura Bogaert; Anne E Rhodes; David J Brennan; Dionne Gesink Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2016-05 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Elizabeth M Saewyc; Yuko Homma; Carol L Skay; Linda H Bearinger; Michael D Resnick; Elizabeth Reis Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2008-11-13 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Pamela McPherson; Laura Lane Alderman; Jazzlynn Temple; Robert Lawrence; Victor J Avila-Quintero; Johnette Magner; Caroline E Sagrera; James C Patterson; Kevin S Murnane Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2022-06-23 Impact factor: 5.435