Venkatesh L Murthy1, Ravi V Shah2, Jared P Reis3, Alexander R Pico4, Robert Kitchen2, Joao A C Lima5, Donald Lloyd-Jones6, Norrina B Allen6, Mercedes Carnethon6, Gregory D Lewis2, Matthew Nayor2, Ramachandran S Vasan7,8, Jane E Freedman9, Clary B Clish10. 1. Departments of Medicine and Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (V.L.M.). 2. Cardiology Division, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (R.K., G.D.L., M.N., R.V.S.). 3. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD (J.P.R.). 4. Institute of Data Science and Biotechnology, Gladstone Institutes, University of California at San Francisco (A.R.P.). 5. Cardiology Division, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD (J.A.C.L.). 6. Northwestern University, Chicago, IL (D.L.-J., N.B.A., M.C.). 7. Sections of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology, Boston University Schools of Medicine and Public Health, MA (R.S.V.). 8. The Framingham Heart Study, MA (R.S.V.). 9. Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester (J.E.F.). 10. Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA (C.B.C.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Whereas cardiovascular disease (CVD) metrics define risk in individuals >40 years of age, the earliest lesions of CVD appear well before this age. Despite the role of metabolism in CVD antecedents, studies in younger, biracial populations to define precise metabolic risk phenotypes are lacking. METHODS: We studied 2330 White and Black young adults (mean age, 32 years; 45% Black) in the CARDIA study (Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults) to identify metabolite profiles associated with an adverse CVD phenome (myocardial structure/function, fitness, vascular calcification), mechanisms, and outcomes over 2 decades. Statistical learning methods (elastic nets/principal components analysis) and Cox regression generated parsimonious, metabolite-based risk scores validated in >1800 individuals in the Framingham Heart Study. RESULTS: In the CARDIA study, metabolite profiles quantified in early adulthood were associated with subclinical CVD development over 20 years, specifying known and novel pathways of CVD (eg, transcriptional regulation, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, nitric oxide, renin-angiotensin). We found 2 multiparametric, metabolite-based scores linked independently to vascular and myocardial health, with metabolites included in each score specifying microbial metabolism, hepatic steatosis, oxidative stress, nitric oxide modulation, and collagen metabolism. The metabolite-based vascular scores were lower in men, and myocardial scores were lower in Black participants. Over a nearly 25-year median follow-up in CARDIA, the metabolite-based vascular score (hazard ratio, 0.68 per SD [95% CI, 0.50-0.92]; P=0.01) and myocardial score (hazard ratio, 0.60 per SD [95% CI, 0.45-0.80]; P=0.0005) in the third and fourth decades of life were associated with clinical CVD with a synergistic association with outcome (Pinteraction=0.009). We replicated these findings in 1898 individuals in the Framingham Heart Study over 2 decades, with a similar association with outcome (including interaction), reclassification, and discrimination. In the Framingham Heart Study, the metabolite scores exhibited an age interaction (P=0.0004 for a combined myocardial-vascular score with incident CVD), such that young adults with poorer metabolite-based health scores had highest hazard of future CVD. CONCLUSIONS: Metabolic signatures of myocardial and vascular health in young adulthood specify known/novel pathways of metabolic dysfunction relevant to CVD, associated with outcome in 2 independent cohorts. Efforts to include precision measures of metabolic health in risk stratification to interrupt CVD at its earliest stage are warranted.
BACKGROUND: Whereas cardiovascular disease (CVD) metrics define risk in individuals >40 years of age, the earliest lesions of CVD appear well before this age. Despite the role of metabolism in CVD antecedents, studies in younger, biracial populations to define precise metabolic risk phenotypes are lacking. METHODS: We studied 2330 White and Black young adults (mean age, 32 years; 45% Black) in the CARDIA study (Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults) to identify metabolite profiles associated with an adverse CVD phenome (myocardial structure/function, fitness, vascular calcification), mechanisms, and outcomes over 2 decades. Statistical learning methods (elastic nets/principal components analysis) and Cox regression generated parsimonious, metabolite-based risk scores validated in >1800 individuals in the Framingham Heart Study. RESULTS: In the CARDIA study, metabolite profiles quantified in early adulthood were associated with subclinical CVD development over 20 years, specifying known and novel pathways of CVD (eg, transcriptional regulation, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, nitric oxide, renin-angiotensin). We found 2 multiparametric, metabolite-based scores linked independently to vascular and myocardial health, with metabolites included in each score specifying microbial metabolism, hepatic steatosis, oxidative stress, nitric oxide modulation, and collagen metabolism. The metabolite-based vascular scores were lower in men, and myocardial scores were lower in Black participants. Over a nearly 25-year median follow-up in CARDIA, the metabolite-based vascular score (hazard ratio, 0.68 per SD [95% CI, 0.50-0.92]; P=0.01) and myocardial score (hazard ratio, 0.60 per SD [95% CI, 0.45-0.80]; P=0.0005) in the third and fourth decades of life were associated with clinical CVD with a synergistic association with outcome (Pinteraction=0.009). We replicated these findings in 1898 individuals in the Framingham Heart Study over 2 decades, with a similar association with outcome (including interaction), reclassification, and discrimination. In the Framingham Heart Study, the metabolite scores exhibited an age interaction (P=0.0004 for a combined myocardial-vascular score with incident CVD), such that young adults with poorer metabolite-based health scores had highest hazard of future CVD. CONCLUSIONS: Metabolic signatures of myocardial and vascular health in young adulthood specify known/novel pathways of metabolic dysfunction relevant to CVD, associated with outcome in 2 independent cohorts. Efforts to include precision measures of metabolic health in risk stratification to interrupt CVD at its earliest stage are warranted.
Entities:
Keywords:
aging; lipidomics; metabolomics; prevention and control; risk
Authors: S Sidney; D R Jacobs; W L Haskell; M A Armstrong; A Dimicco; A Oberman; P J Savage; M L Slattery; B Sternfeld; L Van Horn Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 1991-06-15 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Winfried März; Andreas Meinitzer; Christiane Drechsler; Stefan Pilz; Vera Krane; Marcus E Kleber; Joachim Fischer; Bernhard R Winkelmann; Bernhard O Böhm; Eberhard Ritz; Christoph Wanner Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-08-23 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Megha Prasad; Eric L Matteson; Joerg Herrmann; Rajiv Gulati; Charanjit S Rihal; Lilach O Lerman; Amir Lerman Journal: Hypertension Date: 2016-12-19 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Laura R Loehr; Wayne D Rosamond; Patricia P Chang; Aaron R Folsom; Lloyd E Chambless Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2008-02-14 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Greet L Roef; Youri E Taes; Jean-Marc Kaufman; Caroline M Van Daele; Marc L De Buyzere; Thierry C Gillebert; Ernst R Rietzschel Journal: Thyroid Date: 2013-07-17 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: Ravi V Shah; Ashish S Yeri; Venkatesh L Murthy; Joe M Massaro; Ralph D'Agostino; Jane E Freedman; Michelle T Long; Caroline S Fox; Saumya Das; Emelia J Benjamin; Ramachandran S Vasan; Christopher J O'Donnell; Udo Hoffmann Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 14.676
Authors: A R Dyer; G R Cutter; K Q Liu; M A Armstrong; G D Friedman; G H Hughes; J J Dolce; J Raczynski; G Burke; T Manolio Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 1990 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Tao Li; Zhen Zhang; Stephen C Kolwicz; Lauren Abell; Nathan D Roe; Maengjo Kim; Bo Zhou; Yang Cao; Julia Ritterhoff; Haiwei Gu; Daniel Raftery; Haipeng Sun; Rong Tian Journal: Cell Metab Date: 2017-02-07 Impact factor: 27.287
Authors: Geoffrey A Walford; Yong Ma; Clary Clish; Jose C Florez; Thomas J Wang; Robert E Gerszten Journal: Diabetes Date: 2016-02-09 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Daniel E Cruz; Usman A Tahir; Jie Hu; Debby Ngo; Zsu-Zsu Chen; Jeremy M Robbins; Daniel Katz; Raji Balasubramanian; Bennet Peterson; Shuliang Deng; Mark D Benson; Xu Shi; Lucas Dailey; Yan Gao; Adolfo Correa; Thomas J Wang; Clary B Clish; Kathryn M Rexrode; James G Wilson; Robert E Gerszten Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2022-02-01 Impact factor: 30.154
Authors: Venkatesh L Murthy; Matthew Nayor; Mercedes Carnethon; Jared P Reis; Donald Lloyd-Jones; Norrina B Allen; Robert Kitchen; Paolo Piaggi; Lyn M Steffen; Ramachandran S Vasan; Jane E Freedman; Clary B Clish; Ravi V Shah Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2022-01-18 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Ana Nogal; Panayiotis Louca; Tran Quoc Bao Tran; Ruth C Bowyer; Paraskevi Christofidou; Claire J Steves; Sarah E Berry; Kari Wong; Jonathan Wolf; Paul W Franks; Massimo Mangino; Tim D Spector; Ana M Valdes; Sandosh Padmanabhan; Cristina Menni Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2022-02-12 Impact factor: 6.106