Literature DB >> 33073371

The effect of COVID-19 on general anaesthesia rates for caesarean section. A cross-sectional analysis of six hospitals in the north-west of England.

K Bhatia1, M Columb2, A Bewlay3, J Eccles4, M Hulgur5, N Jayan5, J Lie6, D Verma7, R Parikh7.   

Abstract

At the onset of the global pandemic of COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2), guidelines recommended using regional anaesthesia for caesarean section in preference to general anaesthesia. National figures from the UK suggest that 8.75% of over 170,000 caesarean sections are performed under general anaesthetic. We explored whether general anaesthesia rates for caesarean section changed during the peak of the pandemic across six maternity units in the north-west of England. We analysed anaesthetic information for 2480 caesarean sections across six maternity units from 1 April to 1 July 2020 (during the pandemic) and compared this information with data from 2555 caesarean sections performed at the same hospitals over a similar period in 2019. Primary outcome was change in general anaesthesia rate for caesarean section. Secondary outcomes included overall caesarean section rates, obstetric indications for caesarean section and regional to general anaesthesia conversion rates. A significant reduction (7.7 to 3.7%, p < 0.0001) in general anaesthetic rates, risk ratio (95%CI) 0.50 (0.39-0.93), was noted across hospitals during the pandemic. Regional to general anaesthesia conversion rates reduced (1.7 to 0.8%, p = 0.012), risk ratio (95%CI) 0.50 (0.29-0.86). Obstetric indications for caesarean sections did not change (p = 0.17) while the overall caesarean section rate increased (28.3 to 29.7%), risk ratio (95%CI) 1.02 (1.00-1.04), p = 0.052. Our analysis shows that general anaesthesia rates for caesarean section declined during the peak of the pandemic. Anaesthetic decision-making, recommendations from anaesthetic guidelines and presence of an on-site anaesthetic consultant in the delivery suite seem to be the key factors that influenced this decline.
© 2020 Association of Anaesthetists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; caesarean; general anaesthesia; pregnancy; regional anaesthesia

Year:  2020        PMID: 33073371     DOI: 10.1111/anae.15313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  16 in total

1.  Changes in prenatal care and vaccine willingness among pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Daniel J Erchick; Smisha Agarwal; Alexander Kaysin; Dustin G Gibson; Alain B Labrique
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 3.105

2.  Estimation of the Number of General Anesthesia Cases Based on a Series of Nationwide Surveys on Twitter during COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan: A Statistical Analysis.

Authors:  Yosuke Fujii; Hiroki Daijo; Kiichi Hirota
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 2.430

3.  Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on maternal and perinatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Barbara Chmielewska; Imogen Barratt; Rosemary Townsend; Erkan Kalafat; Jan van der Meulen; Ipek Gurol-Urganci; Pat O'Brien; Edward Morris; Tim Draycott; Shakila Thangaratinam; Kirsty Le Doare; Shamez Ladhani; Peter von Dadelszen; Laura Magee; Asma Khalil
Journal:  Lancet Glob Health       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 26.763

4.  Decision-to-delivery interval and neonatal outcomes for category-1 caesarean sections during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  K Bhatia; M Columb; A Bewlay; N Tageldin; C Knapp; Y Qamar; A Dooley; P Kamath; M Hulgur
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 12.893

Review 5.  Pandemics and maternal health: the indirect effects of COVID-19.

Authors:  D N Lucas; J H Bamber
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 6.955

6.  Changes in rates of adverse pregnancy outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study in the United States, 2019-2020.

Authors:  Regina M Simeone; Karrie F Downing; Bailey Wallace; Romeo R Galang; Carla L DeSisto; Van T Tong; Lauren B Zapata; Jean Y Ko; Sascha R Ellington
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Obstetric interventions and pregnancy outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic in England: A nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  Ipek Gurol-Urganci; Lara Waite; Kirstin Webster; Jennifer Jardine; Fran Carroll; George Dunn; Alissa Frémeaux; Tina Harris; Jane Hawdon; Patrick Muller; Jan van der Meulen; Asma Khalil
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 11.069

8.  The effect of COVID-19 on general anaesthesia rates for caesarean section.

Authors:  A R McCallum; M A Broom; K N Litchfield; M Shaw; R J Kearns
Journal:  Int J Obstet Anesth       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 2.603

9.  Global changes in maternity care provision during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rosemary Townsend; Barbara Chmielewska; Imogen Barratt; Erkan Kalafat; Jan van der Meulen; Ipek Gurol-Urganci; Pat O'Brien; Edward Morris; Tim Draycott; Shakila Thangaratinam; Kirsty Le Doare; Shamez Ladhani; Peter von Dadelszen; Laura A Magee; Asma Khalil
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2021-06-19

Review 10.  Anesthesia Considerations for Pregnant People With COVID-19 Infection.

Authors:  Ruth Landau; Kyra Bernstein; Laurence E Ring
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 2.190

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.