Literature DB >> 33073336

Utility Values for the CP-6D, a Cerebral Palsy-Specific Multi-Attribute Utility Instrument, Using a Discrete Choice Experiment.

Mina Bahrampour1, Richard Norman2, Joshua Byrnes3, Martin Downes3, Paul A Scuffham3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: The CP-6D is a new preference-based measure derived from the CPQOL, a cerebral palsy-specific quality-of-life questionnaire. The CP-6D contains six dimensions, each with five levels. A preference-based value set is required to score the CP-6D on a utility scale and render it suitable for cost-utility analysis. This study aims to estimate the utility value set for the CP-6D for interventions for people with cerebral palsy (CP).
METHODS: A discrete choice experiment was designed and administrated to an adult Australian online panel. Each respondent answered 12 choice sets. Each choice was presented as a combination of the health state from the CP-6D and duration spent in that health state before death. Conditional logit and mixed logit regression were used to analyse the data. The utility values were estimated as a ratio of the coefficient of each dimension to the coefficient of the duration.
RESULTS: A total of 2002 participants completed the survey and responded to each choice. Generally, the dimension levels were monotonic, meaning the coefficients reflected the ordered nature of the levels in each dimension. The dimensions relating to manual ability, social well-being and acceptance had the greatest effect on choice. The value of the worst 'pits' health state is - 0.582.
CONCLUSION: This study provides the first CP-specific utility value set that can potentially be used in cost-utility analyses of interventions for people with CP where the CPQOL has been applied, both prospectively and retrospectively.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33073336     DOI: 10.1007/s40271-020-00468-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient        ISSN: 1178-1653            Impact factor:   3.883


  29 in total

1.  Decision validity should determine whether a generic or condition-specific HRQOL measure is used in health care decisions.

Authors:  Jack Dowie
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 2.  Health state values from multiattribute utility instruments need correction.

Authors:  E Nord
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.709

3.  Development and initial validation of a new preference-based disease-specific health-related quality of life instrument for erectile function.

Authors:  G W Torrance; M A Keresteci; R W Casey; A J Rosner; N Ryan; M C Breton
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Using a discrete choice experiment to estimate health state utility values.

Authors:  Nick Bansback; John Brazier; Aki Tsuchiya; Aslam Anis
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 3.883

5.  QALYs: the basics.

Authors:  Milton C Weinstein; George Torrance; Alistair McGuire
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.725

6.  Validity and feasibility of the use of condition-specific outcome measures in economic evaluation.

Authors:  Elly A Stolk; Jan J V Busschbach
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 7.  One Method, Many Methodological Choices: A Structured Review of Discrete-Choice Experiments for Health State Valuation.

Authors:  Brendan Mulhern; Richard Norman; Deborah J Street; Rosalie Viney
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 8.  Developing and testing methods for deriving preference-based measures of health from condition-specific measures (and other patient-based measures of outcome).

Authors:  J E Brazier; D Rowen; I Mavranezouli; A Tsuchiya; T Young; Y Yang; M Barkham; R Ibbotson
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.014

9.  How to do (or not to do) ... Designing a discrete choice experiment for application in a low-income country.

Authors:  Lindsay J Mangham; Kara Hanson; Barbara McPake
Journal:  Health Policy Plan       Date:  2008-12-26       Impact factor: 3.344

10.  Discrete choice experiments to generate utility values for multi-attribute utility instruments: a systematic review of methods.

Authors:  Mina Bahrampour; Joshua Byrnes; Richard Norman; Paul A Scuffham; Martin Downes
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2020-05-04
View more
  2 in total

1.  Preference Elicitation Techniques Used in Valuing Children's Health-Related Quality-of-Life: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Cate Bailey; Martin Howell; Kirsten Howard; Rosalie Viney; Rakhee Raghunandan; Amber Salisbury; Gang Chen; Joanna Coast; Jonathan C Craig; Nancy J Devlin; Elisabeth Huynh; Emily Lancsar; Brendan J Mulhern; Richard Norman; Stavros Petrou; Julie Ratcliffe; Deborah J Street
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 4.558

2.  Developing a preference-based measure for weight-specific health-related quality of life in adolescence: the WAItE UK valuation study protocol.

Authors:  Tomos Robinson; Sarah Hill; Yemi Oluboyede
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 2.692

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.