Literature DB >> 33071508

Comparison of Postoperative Stability Between BSSRO and Le Fort 1 Osteotomy with BSSRO in Skeletal Class III Malocclusion with Severe Open Bite.

Kazuhiro Ooi1,2, Nobuo Inoue3, Kazuhiro Matsushita1, Hiro-O Yamaguchi1, Tadashi Mikoya1, Shuichi Kawashiri2, Kanchu Tei1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to investigate postoperative stability after orthognathic surgery in patients with skeletal class III malocclusion with severe open bite by comparison between bilateral sagittal splitting osteotomy (BSSRO) and BSSRO with Le Fort 1 osteotomy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventeen patients with skeletal class III malocclusion with severe open bite who were needed more than 6 degree counterclockwise rotation of distal segment by only BSSRO in preoperative cephalometric prediction. The subjects were divided into group A, where 9 patients were treated by BSSRO, and group B, where 8 patients were treated by BSSRO with Le Fort 1 osteotomy. Patient's characteristics of age, gender, preoperative over jet (OJ) and over bite (OB) were not found to be significantly different between the two groups. Counterclockwise rotation of distal segment in preoperative cephalometric prediction by only BSSRO was not found to be significantly different between group A of 7.6 (6-10.6) degree and group B of 9 (6-13) degree. The amount of rotation was reduced to 5.4 (3-10) degree by bimaxillary surgery using BSSRO and Le Fort 1 osteotomy in group B. OJ and OB were measured as occlusal stability factor. Distance between ANS-to-PNS plane and the edge of upper incisor (NF-U1Ed), and distance between Menton and edge of lower incisor (Me-L1Ed) were measured as skeletal stability factor using cephalometric analysis. These lengths were measured at pre-surgery (T0), 2 weeks after surgery (T1) and 1 year after surgery (T2), and these differences between the two groups were statistically analyzed.
RESULTS: OJ and OB kept a good relation at any experimental periods. The change of Me-L1Ed was significantly larger in group A (1.21 mm at T0-T1, 1.02 mm at T0-T2) than in group B (0.14 mm at T0-T1, 0.16 mm at T0-T2). The change of NF-U1Ed was not significantly different between group A (1.07 mm at T0-T1, 0.57 mm at T0-T2) and group B (0.51 mm at T0-T1, - 0.05 mm at T0-T2).
CONCLUSION: In case with more than 6 degree counterclockwise rotation of distal segment, skeletal stability was better after bimaxillary surgery than only BSSRO; however, OJ and OB kept a good relation. © The Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons of India 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Le Fort 1 osteotomy; Sagittal splitting ramus osteotomy; Skeletal class III with severe open bite; Skeletal stability

Year:  2019        PMID: 33071508      PMCID: PMC7524990          DOI: 10.1007/s12663-019-01300-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg        ISSN: 0972-8270


  26 in total

1.  Open bite: stability after bimaxillary surgery--2-year treatment outcomes in 58 patients.

Authors:  K Fischer; L von Konow; V Brattström
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Stability of open bite treatment.

Authors:  Peter A Shapiro
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  Long-term stability of anterior open bite extraction treatment in the permanent dentition.

Authors:  Marcos Roberto de Freitas; Rejane Targino Soares Beltrão; Guilherme Janson; José Fernando Castanha Henriques; Rodrigo Hermont Cançado
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  Long-term skeletal stability after surgical correction in Class III open-bite patients: a retrospective study on 40 patients treated with mono- or bimaxillary surgery.

Authors:  Giorgio Iannetti; Maria Teresa Fadda; Tito Matteo Marianetti; Valentina Terenzi; Andrea Cassoni
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.046

5.  Treatment results and long-term stability of anterior open bite malocclusion.

Authors:  D Remmers; R W G J Van't Hullenaar; E M Bronkhorst; S J Bergé; C Katsaros
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.826

6.  Stability after mandibular setback: mandible-only versus 2-jaw surgery.

Authors:  William R Proffit; Ceib Phillips; Timothy A Turvey
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 1.895

7.  Skeletal and dento-alveolar stability of Le Fort I intrusion osteotomies and bimaxillary osteotomies in anterior open bite deformities. A retrospective three-centre study.

Authors:  T J Hoppenreijs; H P Freihofer; P J Stoelinga; D B Tuinzing; M A van't Hof; F P van der Linden; S J Nottet
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.789

8.  Long-term stability of mandibular setback surgery: a follow-up of 80 bilateral sagittal split osteotomy patients.

Authors:  K A Mobarak; O Krogstad; L Espeland; T Lyberg
Journal:  Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg       Date:  2000

9.  The stability of the use of bilateral sagittal split osteotomy in the closure of anterior open bite.

Authors:  J A Oliveira; D S Bloomquist
Journal:  Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg       Date:  1997

10.  Stability following combined orthodontic-surgical treatment for skeletal anterior open bite - a cephalometric 15-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Yun Ding; Tian-Min Xu; Bettina Lohrmann; Nils-Claudius Gellrich; Rainer Schwestka-Polly
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.938

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.