Carolina Santos Ventura de Souza 1 , Bruno Costa Martins de Sá 2 , Douglas Goulart 3 , Gabriel Albuquerque Guillen 1 , Felipe Germóglio C Macêdo 1 , Claudio Ferreira Nóia 1 Show Affiliations »
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess bone thickness augmentation and implant survival in ridges with horizontal atrophy managed through split crest technique with concomitant installation of dental implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirteen patients with maxillary bone atrophy underwent surgery and had their bone thickness assessed through cone beam computed tomography 6 months pre- and postoperatively. Comparative measurements of initial and final bone height and thickness were taken using Dolphin Imaging® 11.5 software. The distance between the nasal fossa floor or the maxillary sinus and the alveolar crest determined the bone height, while the measurement of bone thickness took into account the distance between the vestibular cortical bone and the palatal cortical bone at the crest level, and at 5 mm and 10 mm from it. RESULTS: The bone height loss of 0.68 mm was statistically significant (p = 0.01). The average horizontal bone gain was 3.45 mm at ridge level, 3.03 mm at 5 mm from it and 2.42 mm at 10 mm from it. The mean horizontal gain for the three regions was 2.97 mm, and the values were statistically significant for all three regions assessed (p < 0.01). No complications were associated with the surgical procedures, and 23 implants were installed following the surgical expansion. No implants were lost (100% survival). CONCLUSION: The split crest technique proved to be viable and predictable, enabling a significant increase in ridge thickness and a high percentage of implant survival. © The Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons of India 2020.
OBJECTIVE: To assess bone thickness augmentation and implant survival in ridges with horizontal atrophy managed through split crest technique with concomitant installation of dental implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirteen patients with maxillary bone atrophy underwent surgery and had their bone thickness assessed through cone beam computed tomography 6 months pre- and postoperatively. Comparative measurements of initial and final bone height and thickness were taken using Dolphin Imaging® 11.5 software. The distance between the nasal fossa floor or the maxillary sinus and the alveolar crest determined the bone height, while the measurement of bone thickness took into account the distance between the vestibular cortical bone and the palatal cortical bone at the crest level, and at 5 mm and 10 mm from it. RESULTS: The bone height loss of 0.68 mm was statistically significant (p = 0.01). The average horizontal bone gain was 3.45 mm at ridge level, 3.03 mm at 5 mm from it and 2.42 mm at 10 mm from it. The mean horizontal gain for the three regions was 2.97 mm, and the values were statistically significant for all three regions assessed (p < 0.01). No complications were associated with the surgical procedures, and 23 implants were installed following the surgical expansion. No implants were lost (100% survival). CONCLUSION: The split crest technique proved to be viable and predictable, enabling a significant increase in ridge thickness and a high percentage of implant survival. © The Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons of India 2020.
Entities: Chemical
Keywords:
Alveolar ridge augmentation; Dental implants; Rehabilitation
Year: 2020
PMID： 33071495 PMCID： PMC7524911 DOI： 10.1007/s12663-020-01332-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Maxillofac Oral Surg ISSN： 0972-8270