Literature DB >> 33071242

Improved Risk Stratification of Patients With Brugada Syndrome by the New Japanese Circulation Society Guideline - A Multicenter Validation Study.

Akinori Wakamiya1,2, Tsukasa Kamakura1, Tetsuji Shinohara3, Kenji Yodogawa4, Nobuyuki Murakoshi2, Hiroshi Morita5, Naohiko Takahashi3, Yasuya Inden6, Wataru Shimizu4, Akihiko Nogami2, Minoru Horie7, Kenzaburo Nakajima1, Naoya Kataoka1, Mitsuru Wada1, Kenichiro Yamagata1, Kohei Ishibashi1, Yuko Inoue1, Koji Miyamoto1, Satoshi Nagase1, Takashi Noda1, Takeshi Aiba1, Satoshi Yasuda1, Masaki Ieda2, Kengo Kusano1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The new guideline (NG) published by the Japanese Circulation Society (JCS) places emphasis on previous arrhythmic syncope and inducibility of ventricular fibrillation (VF) by ≤2 extrastimuli during programmed electrical stimulation (PES) for deciding the indication of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in patients with Brugada syndrome (BrS). This study evaluated the usefulness of the NG and compared it with the former guideline (FG) for risk stratification of patients with BrS.Methods and 
Results: This was a multicenter (7 Japanese hospitals) retrospective study involving 234 patients with BrS who underwent PES at baseline (226 males; mean age at diagnosis: 44.9±13.4 years). At diagnosis, 46 patients (20%) had previous VF, 100 patients (43%) had previous syncope, and 88 patients (37%) were asymptomatic. We evaluated the difference in the incidence of VF in each indication according to the new and FGs. During the follow-up period (mean: 6.9±5.2 years), the incidence of VF was higher in patients with Class IIa indication according to the NG (NG: 16/45 patients [35.6%] vs. FG: 16/104 patients [15.4%]), while the incidence of VF in patients with other than class I or IIa indication was similarly low in both guidelines (NG: 2/143 patients [1.4%] vs. FG: 2/84 patients [2.4%]).
CONCLUSIONS: This study validated the usefulness of the NG for risk stratification of BrS patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brugada syndrome; Guidelines; Implantable cardioverter defibrillators; Ventricular fibrillation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33071242     DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-19-0910

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ J        ISSN: 1346-9843            Impact factor:   2.993


  2 in total

Review 1.  Pathogenesis and Management of Brugada Syndrome: Recent Advances and Protocol for Umbrella Reviews of Meta-Analyses in Major Arrhythmic Events Risk Stratification.

Authors:  Hasina Masha Aziz; Michał P Zarzecki; Sebastian Garcia-Zamora; Min Seo Kim; Piotr Bijak; Gary Tse; Hong-Hee Won; Paweł T Matusik
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 4.241

2.  Ventricular Tachyarrhythmia Risk in Paediatric/Young vs. Adult Brugada Syndrome Patients: A Territory-Wide Study.

Authors:  Sharen Lee; Wing Tak Wong; Ian Chi Kei Wong; Chloe Mak; Ngai Shing Mok; Tong Liu; Gary Tse
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-06-11
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.