Literature DB >> 33070284

Molecular and morphometric divergence of four species of butterflies (Nymphalidae and Pieridae) from the Western Himalaya, India.

Vinaya Kumar Singh1, Prakash Chandra Joshi2, Sandeep Kumar Gupta3.   

Abstract

Morphometric and molecular divergence among four butterfly species of the families Nymphalidae and Pieridae from the western Himalaya region were investigated using molecular tools, traditional morphometric measures and a truss network system. The considered species were Danaus chrysippus, Vanessa cardui, Pieris brassicae and Pieris canidia. Traditional taxonomy is sometimes unable to discriminate cryptic species or species that have close morphological features. Although taxonomists carefully examine external body features to differentiate the species; however, there is a risk for misidentification during a visual assessment of cryptic species. Therefore, we aimed to use the truss network system of 14 morphological landmarks interconnected to yield 90 variables about molecular taxonomy. Principal component analysis (PCA), discriminant function analysis (DFA) and cluster analysis (CA) were employed to determine morphometric variations. In the traditional analysis, 79, 68, 16 and 5 characters out of 90 were found significant (p < 0.05) for D. chrysippus, V. cardui, P. brassicae and P. canidia, respectively. One to seven principal components were extracted through PCA; they explained 87.5-100% of the total variance in samples. Notably, DFA correctly classified 100% of the original grouped cases and 100% of the cross-validated grouped cases. However, the variations were not the same for the two different methods (truss and traditional) employed for the analysis. We correctly identified all the species; the interspecies sequence divergence was between 0.1034 and 0.1398, and the intra-species sequence divergence range was 0.0001 to 0.0128 using the Cytochrome c oxidase subunit-I (COI) gene. The present study provides useful information about the application and complementary role of traditional with truss morphometric analysis for the precise identification and classification of the selected species.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Butterfly; Cytochrome c oxidase I; Morphometric geometry; Western himalayas

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33070284     DOI: 10.1007/s11033-020-05913-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Rep        ISSN: 0301-4851            Impact factor:   2.316


  32 in total

1.  Complete DNA barcode reference library for a country's butterfly fauna reveals high performance for temperate Europe.

Authors:  Vlad Dinca; Evgeny V Zakharov; Paul D N Hebert; Roger Vila
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  The promise of DNA barcoding for taxonomy.

Authors:  Paul D N Hebert; T Ryan Gregory
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 15.683

3.  Natural variation of ebony gene controlling thoracic pigmentation in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Aya Takahashi; Kuniaki Takahashi; Ryu Ueda; Toshiyuki Takano-Shimizu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-07-29       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Habitat variation and wing coloration affect wing shape evolution in dragonflies.

Authors:  D Outomuro; K-D B Dijkstra; F Johansson
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 2.411

5.  Evolution of wing shape in hornets: why is the wing venation efficient for species identification?

Authors:  A Perrard; M Baylac; J M Carpenter; C Villemant
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 2.411

6.  Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerator.

Authors:  Paul D N Hebert; Erin H Penton; John M Burns; Daniel H Janzen; Winnie Hallwachs
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Use of wing morphometrics to identify populations of the Old World screwworm fly, Chrysomya bezziana (Diptera: Calliphoridae): a preliminary study of the utility of museum specimens.

Authors:  M J R Hall; N MacLeod; A H Wardhana
Journal:  Acta Trop       Date:  2014-04-12       Impact factor: 3.112

8.  Wing morphometry as a tool for correct identification of primary and secondary New World screwworm fly.

Authors:  M L Lyra; L M Hatadani; A M L de Azeredo-Espin; L B Klaczko
Journal:  Bull Entomol Res       Date:  2009-03-23       Impact factor: 1.750

9.  Morphometrical diagnosis of the malaria vectors Anopheles cruzii, An. homunculus and An. bellator.

Authors:  Camila Lorenz; Tatiani Cristina Marques; Maria Anice Mureb Sallum; Lincoln Suesdek
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 3.876

10.  Identification of Birds through DNA Barcodes.

Authors:  Paul D N Hebert; Mark Y Stoeckle; Tyler S Zemlak; Charles M Francis
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2004-09-28       Impact factor: 8.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.