Literature DB >> 33070093

The role of alternative splicing in cancer: From oncogenesis to drug resistance.

Rocco Sciarrillo1, Anna Wojtuszkiewicz2, Yehuda G Assaraf3, Gerrit Jansen4, Gertjan J L Kaspers5, Elisa Giovannetti6, Jacqueline Cloos7.   

Abstract

Alternative splicing is a tightly regulated process whereby non-coding sequences of pre-mRNA are removed and protein-coding segments are assembled in diverse combinations, ultimately giving rise to proteins with distinct or even opposing functions. In the past decade, whole genome/transcriptome sequencing studies revealed the high complexity of splicing regulation, which occurs co-transcriptionally and is influenced by chromatin status and mRNA modifications. Consequently, splicing profiles of both healthy and malignant cells display high diversity and alternative splicing was shown to be widely deregulated in multiple cancer types. In particular, mutations in pre-mRNA regulatory sequences, splicing regulators and chromatin modifiers, as well as differential expression of splicing factors are important contributors to cancer pathogenesis. It has become clear that these aberrations contribute to many facets of cancer, including oncogenic transformation, cancer progression, response to anticancer drug treatment as well as resistance to therapy. In this respect, alternative splicing was shown to perturb the expression a broad spectrum of relevant genes involved in drug uptake/metabolism (i.e. SLC29A1, dCK, FPGS, and TP), activation of nuclear receptor pathways (i.e. GR, AR), regulation of apoptosis (i.e. MCL1, BCL-X, and FAS) and modulation of response to immunotherapy (CD19). Furthermore, aberrant splicing constitutes an important source of novel cancer biomarkers and the spliceosome machinery represents an attractive target for a novel and rapidly expanding class of therapeutic agents. Small molecule inhibitors targeting SF3B1 or splice factor kinases were highly cytotoxic against a wide range of cancer models, including drug-resistant cells. Importantly, these effects are enhanced in specific cancer subsets, such as splicing factor-mutated and c-MYC-driven tumors. Furthermore, pre-clinical studies report synergistic effects of spliceosome modulators in combination with conventional antitumor agents. These strategies based on the use of low dose splicing modulators could shift the therapeutic window towards decreased toxicity in healthy tissues. Here we provide an extensive overview of the latest findings in the field of regulation of splicing in cancer, including molecular mechanisms by which cancer cells harness alternative splicing to drive oncogenesis and evade anticancer drug treatment as well as splicing-based vulnerabilities that can provide novel treatment opportunities. Furthermore, we discuss current challenges arising from genome-wide detection and prediction methods of aberrant splicing, as well as unravelling functional relevance of the plethora of cancer-related splicing alterations.
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alternative splicing; Cancer; Drug resistance; Oncogenesis; SF3B1 inhibition; Splicing factor mutation; Splicing modulation

Year:  2020        PMID: 33070093     DOI: 10.1016/j.drup.2020.100728

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Resist Updat        ISSN: 1368-7646            Impact factor:   18.500


  33 in total

1.  Alterations of RNA splicing patterns in esophagus squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Jiyu Ding; Chunquan Li; Yinwei Cheng; Zepeng Du; Qiuyu Wang; Zhidong Tang; Chao Song; Qiaoxi Xia; Wenjing Bai; Ling Lin; Wei Liu; Liyan Xu; Enmin Li; Bingli Wu
Journal:  Cell Biosci       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 7.133

2.  Proteomic Analysis of the Non-genetic Response to Cisplatin in Lung Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Cristine DE Souza Dutra; Carolina Lumertz Martello; Nathan Araujo Cadore; Henrique Bunselmeyer Ferreira; Arnaldo Zaha; Karina Mariante Monteiro
Journal:  Cancer Diagn Progn       Date:  2021-07-03

3.  Immunological significance of prognostic markers for breast cancer based on alternative splicing.

Authors:  Rong Xu; Qinglong Yang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 3.940

4.  Comprehensive analysis of spliceosome genes and their mutants across 27 cancer types in 9070 patients: clinically relevant outcomes in the context of 3P medicine.

Authors:  Zhen Ye; Aiying Bing; Shulian Zhao; Shuying Yi; Xianquan Zhan
Journal:  EPMA J       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 8.836

5.  Development of a Prognostic Alternative Splicing Signature Associated With Tumor Microenvironment Immune Profiles in Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Guangyao Bao; Tian Li; Xiaojiao Guan; Yao Yao; Jie Liang; Yifan Xiang; Xinwen Zhong
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 5.738

6.  Inferences of carboplatin response-related signature by integrating multiomics data in ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Jia-Qing Yan; Min Liu; Ying-Lin Ma; Kai-di Le; Bin Dong; Guo-Hui Li
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2022-03-12

7.  Characterization of alternative splicing events and prognostic signatures in breast cancer.

Authors:  Pihua Han; Jingjun Zhu; Guang Feng; Zizhang Wang; Yanni Ding
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 8.  Anticancer drug resistance: An update and perspective.

Authors:  Ruth Nussinov; Chung-Jung Tsai; Hyunbum Jang
Journal:  Drug Resist Updat       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 18.500

9.  A stealth antigen SPESP1, which is epigenetically silenced in tumors, is a suitable target for cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Akemi Kosaka; Yuki Yajima; Mayumi Hatayama; Katsuya Ikuta; Takaaki Sasaki; Noriko Hirai; Syunsuke Yasuda; Marino Nagata; Ryusuke Hayashi; Shohei Harabuchi; Kenzo Ohara; Mizuho Ohara; Takumi Kumai; Kei Ishibashi; Yui Hirata-Nozaki; Toshihiro Nagato; Kensuke Oikawa; Yasuaki Harabuchi; Esteban Celis; Toshikatsu Okumura; Yoshinobu Ohsaki; Hiroya Kobayashi; Takayuki Ohkuri
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 6.716

Review 10.  Arsenic-induced epigenetic changes in cancer development.

Authors:  Wesley N Saintilnord; Yvonne Fondufe-Mittendorf
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 15.707

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.