Shannon Crouch1, Laurence G Trahair2, Leanne M Aitken3. 1. Intensive Care Outreach Service, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. Electronic address: shannon.crouch@health.qld.gov.au. 2. School of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia. 3. School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, United Kingdom; School of Nursing and Midwifery & Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the current utilisation of altered rapid response calling criteria (ARRCCs) at a tertiary hospital. METHODS: A retrospective review of all acute care admissions across 17 months was undertaken using the hospital administration system and electronic medical record to identify patients with ARRCCs. In patients with altered criteria, the type of alteration, frequency of rapid response calls, cardiac arrest, intensive care admission, and death in the hospital were identified. Comparisons were made using standard statistical methods. RESULTS: The total hospital admissions numbered 45 912, with ARRCCs used in 768 (1.7%). Patients with an ARRCC during hospital admission were older (68.5 [55.5, 79.0] vs 59.0 [43.0, 72.0] years, p < 0.001) and had a significantly longer length of hospital stay (6.9 [3.0, 16.3] vs 2 [1, 5] days, p < 0.001).Compared with the total group of patient admissions, patients with ARRCCs more frequently triggered a rapid response team (9.0% vs 14.2%, χ2(1, n = 46 680) = 23.87, p < 0.001), more frequently suffered a cardiac arrest (0.2 vs 0.9%, χ2(1, n = 46 678) = 20.34, p < 0.001), more frequently died in the hospital (p < 0.001), and were less frequently discharged home (χ2(1, n = 46 680) = 43.91, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients with an ARRCC stayed longer in the hospital and were at increased risk of cardiac arrest and death during hospitalisation. Further exploration of the role of ARRCCs in facilitating individualised care to meet the needs and treatment goals of each patient in the acute hospital setting is required.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the current utilisation of altered rapid response calling criteria (ARRCCs) at a tertiary hospital. METHODS: A retrospective review of all acute care admissions across 17 months was undertaken using the hospital administration system and electronic medical record to identify patients with ARRCCs. In patients with altered criteria, the type of alteration, frequency of rapid response calls, cardiac arrest, intensive care admission, and death in the hospital were identified. Comparisons were made using standard statistical methods. RESULTS: The total hospital admissions numbered 45 912, with ARRCCs used in 768 (1.7%). Patients with an ARRCC during hospital admission were older (68.5 [55.5, 79.0] vs 59.0 [43.0, 72.0] years, p < 0.001) and had a significantly longer length of hospital stay (6.9 [3.0, 16.3] vs 2 [1, 5] days, p < 0.001).Compared with the total group of patient admissions, patients with ARRCCs more frequently triggered a rapid response team (9.0% vs 14.2%, χ2(1, n = 46 680) = 23.87, p < 0.001), more frequently suffered a cardiac arrest (0.2 vs 0.9%, χ2(1, n = 46 678) = 20.34, p < 0.001), more frequently died in the hospital (p < 0.001), and were less frequently discharged home (χ2(1, n = 46 680) = 43.91, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION:Patients with an ARRCC stayed longer in the hospital and were at increased risk of cardiac arrest and death during hospitalisation. Further exploration of the role of ARRCCs in facilitating individualised care to meet the needs and treatment goals of each patient in the acute hospital setting is required.