Literature DB >> 33068645

Revascularization versus medical therapy for the treatment of stable coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis of contemporary randomized controlled trials.

Jari A Laukkanen1, Setor K Kunutsor2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of contemporary randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare clinical outcomes among stable coronary artery disease (CAD) patients treated with revascularization [percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) or both] plus medical therapy (MT) versus MT alone.
METHODS: Prospective RCTs were sought from MEDLINE, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science up to April 2020. Data was extracted on study characteristics, methods, and outcomes. Relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled for the composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), revascularizations, rehospitalizations, or stroke; its individual components and other cardiovascular endpoints.
RESULTS: Twelve unique RCTs comprising of 15,774 patients were included. There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality risk (0.95, 95% CI: 0.86-1.06); however, revascularization plus MT reduced the risk of the composite outcome of all-cause mortality, MI, revascularizations, rehospitalizations, or stroke (0.69, 95% CI: 0.55-0.87); unplanned revascularization (0.53, 95% CI: 0.40-0.71); and fatal MI (0.65, 95% CI: 0.49-0.84). Revascularization plus MT reduced the risk of stroke at 1 year (0.44, 95% CI: 0.30-0.65) and unplanned revascularization and the composite outcome of all-cause mortality, MI, revascularizations, rehospitalizations, or stroke at 2-5 years.
CONCLUSIONS: Revascularization plus MT does not confer survival advantage beyond that of MT among patients with stable CAD. However, revascularization plus MT may reduce the overall risk of the combined outcome of mortality, MI, revascularizations, rehospitalizations, or stroke, which could be driven by a decrease in the risk of unplanned revascularizations or fatal MI.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coronary artery disease; Coronary-artery bypass grafting; Medical therapy; Meta-analysis; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Revascularization

Year:  2020        PMID: 33068645     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.10.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  3 in total

1.  IACTS position statement on "2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization": section 7.1-a consensus document.

Authors:  Om Prakash Yadava; Pradeep Narayan; Chandrasekar Padmanabhan; Lokeswara Rao Sajja; Kunal Sarkar; Praveen Kerala Varma; Vivek Jawali
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2022-01-22

2.  Revascularization or medical therapy for stable coronary artery disease patients with different degrees of ischemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of myocardial perfusion.

Authors:  JingWen Yong; JinFan Tian; Xin Zhao; XueYao Yang; MingDuo Zhang; Yuan Zhou; Yi He; XianTao Song
Journal:  Ther Adv Chronic Dis       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 5.091

3.  Revascularization vs. Conservative Medical Treatment in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease and Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Guang-Zhi Liao; Yi-Ming Li; Lin Bai; Yu-Yang Ye; Yong Peng
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-02-07
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.