Improvements in Flow Cytometry-Based Cytotoxicity Assay.

The flow cytometry-based assay has been increasingly used to assess the cell-mediated cytotoxicity since the 1980s due to its advantages over the conventional radioactive 51 Cr release assay (CRA), such as higher sensitivity at the single-cell level and nonradioactivity. The basic principle of this assay is the usage of two dyes, one nontoxic dye for labeling targets or effector cells to distinguish one from another, one viability dye for discrimination of dead from live cells. Due to the problem of spontaneous release or leakage of the nontoxic dye, the concern about the cross-staining has not yet been clearly elucidated. In this study, carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester (CFSE) was utilized to label target cells and Hoechst 33258 was used as the viability dye. We confirmed that no cross-staining occurred between the effector and target cells after 4 h of coculture. We also found that the cytotoxicity would be overestimated if effector cells instead of target cells were labeled due to the exclusion of viable targets in effector-target conjugates. Using EDTA at the end of culture or labeling targets can solve this problem. Furthermore, the gating strategy could be improved by plotting CFSE against forward scatter (FSC) to discriminate some early apoptotic events. Due to the loss of target cells lysed by effector cells, counting beads are normally preferable in this assay. Here, we found an alternative to the use of beads in standardizing the flow cytometry-based assay. Instead of using beads, sample acquisition in a fixed time was shown to have the same effect in specific lysis evaluation as the beads application but have a greater stability than the latter. With a good quality control, the acquisition time for each sample could be shortened to 15 s, thus making this work to be done efficiently, especially in the case of larger sample sizes. Collectively, the findings in this study can improve the flow cytometric cytotoxicity assay to be carried out in a more accurate, efficient, and cost-effective way.