BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the most common cancer and the leading cause of death among women. KRAS is known as an oncogene, its expression also associates with cancer prognosis. The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of KRAS expression in breast cancer and its relationship with immune infiltration. METHODS: Firstly, the expression level and methylation of KRAS were analyzed. Then survival analysis was used to verify the prognostic capability of KRAS expression. After that, gene functional enrichment analysis was performed. The relationship between KRAS gene expression and immune infiltration was researched later. RESULTS: The expression level of KRAS in breast cancer was increased (P = 2.2e-16). Tumor KRAS expression in the subtypes of basal-like, HER2-enriched, Luminal A and Luminal B were 1.64, 1.67, 1.51 and 1.42 times of normal, respectively. 13 methylation sites were different between tumor and normal tissues and associated with KRAS expression. Subsequently, Kaplan-Meier analysis suggested that the high KRAS expression group had a poor prognosis (P = 0.0028). In multivariate Cox regression analysis, KRAS expression was an independent prognostic indicator (HR = 1.353, 95% CI 1.009-1.814, P = 0.044). Gene Ontology (GO) analysis showed enrichment of epidermal growth associated pathways. Additionally, different KRAS expression levels represented different tumor immune infiltration status, which may be caused by the influence of the RAS/MAPK and RAS/PI3K pathways on the level of PD-L1. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that KRAS expression can be used as a prognostic indicator of breast cancer, and it is closely related to tumor immune infiltration.
BACKGROUND:Breast cancer is the most common cancer and the leading cause of death among women. KRAS is known as an oncogene, its expression also associates with cancer prognosis. The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of KRAS expression in breast cancer and its relationship with immune infiltration. METHODS: Firstly, the expression level and methylation of KRAS were analyzed. Then survival analysis was used to verify the prognostic capability of KRAS expression. After that, gene functional enrichment analysis was performed. The relationship between KRAS gene expression and immune infiltration was researched later. RESULTS: The expression level of KRAS in breast cancer was increased (P = 2.2e-16). TumorKRAS expression in the subtypes of basal-like, HER2-enriched, Luminal A and Luminal B were 1.64, 1.67, 1.51 and 1.42 times of normal, respectively. 13 methylation sites were different between tumor and normal tissues and associated with KRAS expression. Subsequently, Kaplan-Meier analysis suggested that the high KRAS expression group had a poor prognosis (P = 0.0028). In multivariate Cox regression analysis, KRAS expression was an independent prognostic indicator (HR = 1.353, 95% CI 1.009-1.814, P = 0.044). Gene Ontology (GO) analysis showed enrichment of epidermal growth associated pathways. Additionally, different KRAS expression levels represented different tumor immune infiltration status, which may be caused by the influence of the RAS/MAPK and RAS/PI3K pathways on the level of PD-L1. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that KRAS expression can be used as a prognostic indicator of breast cancer, and it is closely related to tumor immune infiltration.
Entities:
Keywords:
Biomarker; Breast cancer; Immune infiltration; KRAS expression; Prognosis