Literature DB >> 33067725

Contemporary use of phytotherapy in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia: results from the EVOLUTION European registry.

Nikita R Bhatt1, Niall F Davis2, W P Witjes3, A Bjartell3,4, C Caris3, A Patel5, A de la Taille6, Mark Speakman7, Luis Martínez-Piñeiro8, A Tubaro9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To use the European Association of Urology Research Foundation (EAURF) registry data to determine the proportion of contemporary Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms associated with Benign Prostatic Enlargement (LUTS/BPE) patients prescribed phytotherapy, and to determine their subjective quality of life and clinical progression responses.
METHODS: This was a prospective multicenter multinational observational registry study, conducted over 2 years. Men ≥ 50 years seeking LUTS/BPE were divided at baseline into two cohorts, presently/recently untreated patients (PUP) commencing pharmacotherapy at baseline and presently/recently treated patients (c-PTP) continuing previously received pharmacotherapy, with 24-month follow-up (FU).
RESULTS: Overall, 2175 patients were enrolled with 1838 analyzed. Of the PUP cohort (n = 575), 92 (16%) received phytotherapy and 65 (71%, n = 65/92) completed 24-month FU, with France prescribing 34% (n = 30/89) the highest proportion of phytotherapy among all LUTS/BPE medications. In the c-PTP group (n = 1263), only 69 (5%) patients were using phytotherapy, falling to n = 35/69 (51%) at 24-month FU (highest in France 20% (n = 43/210)). Though defined disease progression occurred in ≤ 20%, with only 1% proceeding to surgical intervention, in both groups, clinically meaningful improvement was lower and symptom persistence was higher in PUP but similar in the treated (c-PTP) patients on phytotherapy compared to the other LUTS/BPE medication.
CONCLUSION: Low heterogeneous prescribing rates for phytotherapy were reported in both PUP and c-PTP cohorts over the 24-month FU. Although phytotherapy led to subjective improvements, healthcare practitioners should prescribe them with caution until higher quality evidence and guideline recommendations supporting its use are available.
© 2020. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Benign prostatic enlargement; Guidelines; Medical treatment; Plant extracts; Serona repens

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33067725     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03480-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  1 in total

Review 1.  Serenoa repens for benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  James Tacklind; Roderick Macdonald; Indy Rutks; Judith U Stanke; Timothy J Wilt
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-12-12
  1 in total
  3 in total

1.  Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of ultrasound-guided transperineal laser ablation for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a single institutional experience.

Authors:  Nicola Frego; Alberto Saita; Paolo Casale; Pietro Diana; Roberto Contieri; Pier Paolo Avolio; Massimo Lazzeri; Rodolfo Hurle; Nicolò Maria Buffi; Giorgio Ferruccio Guazzoni; Giovanni Lughezzani
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-04-03       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Extract from Cucurbita pepo improves BPH symptoms without affecting sexual function: a 24-month noninterventional study.

Authors:  Gerit Theil; Michael Richter; Matthias Schulze; Tilo Köttig; Brigitte Patz; Stefan Heim; Yvonne Krauß; Miroslav Markov; Paolo Fornara
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 3.661

3.  Low prescribing rates of phytotherapy for LUTS.

Authors:  Rebecca Tregunna
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 14.432

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.