Tomoharu Mochizuki1, Go Omori2, Katsutoshi Nishino3, Masaei Tanaka3, Osamu Tanifuji4, Hiroshi Koga4, Takahiro Mori5, Yoshio Koga6, Hiroyuki Kawashima4. 1. Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Department of Regenerative and Transplant Medicine, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Science, 1-757 Asahimachi-dori Chuo-ku, Niigata City, Niigata, 951-8510, Japan. tommochi121710@gmail.com. 2. Department of Health and Sports, Faculty of Health Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata, Japan. 3. Niigata Institute for Health and Sports Medicine, Niigata, Japan. 4. Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Department of Regenerative and Transplant Medicine, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Science, 1-757 Asahimachi-dori Chuo-ku, Niigata City, Niigata, 951-8510, Japan. 5. Graduate School of Science and Technology, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan. 6. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nioji Onsen Hospital, Niigata, Japan.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Whether the inclined articular surface on the medial proximal tibia and the external knee adduction moment (KAM) correlate remains unclear. The hypothesis was that a steeper inclined articular surface correlated with a larger KAM in advanced knee osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: A total of 44 females (non-OA, 9 knees; early OA, 14 knees; advanced OA, 21 knees; mean age, 58 ± 16 years) were examined. Three-dimensional (3D) assessment was used on biplanar long-leg radiographs and 3D bone models using a 3D to 2D image registration technique. The approximation plane in the proximal tibia was determined using the least-square method. The joint moments were mathematically calculated in a gait analysis, applying a motion capture system and force plates. The main evaluation parameters were the femorotibial angle (FTA), the coronal inclination of the approximation plane in the medial proximal tibia (coronal inclination), and internal knee joint moments. The KAM means the external moments balanced with the internal knee abduction moments. RESULTS: The advanced OA showed a larger internal abduction moment (p = 0.017) at the loading response than the other groups. The larger FTA and steeper coronal inclination correlated with the larger internal abduction moment (FTA, p < 0.001; coronal inclination, p = 0.003) at the loading response. CONCLUSIONS: As the clinical relevance, the association among the coronal inclination of the medial proximal tibia, lower extremity alignment, and KAM is one of the key factors to help better understand the etiology of knee OA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
PURPOSE: Whether the inclined articular surface on the medial proximal tibia and the external knee adduction moment (KAM) correlate remains unclear. The hypothesis was that a steeper inclined articular surface correlated with a larger KAM in advanced knee osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: A total of 44 females (non-OA, 9 knees; early OA, 14 knees; advanced OA, 21 knees; mean age, 58 ± 16 years) were examined. Three-dimensional (3D) assessment was used on biplanar long-leg radiographs and 3D bone models using a 3D to 2D image registration technique. The approximation plane in the proximal tibia was determined using the least-square method. The joint moments were mathematically calculated in a gait analysis, applying a motion capture system and force plates. The main evaluation parameters were the femorotibial angle (FTA), the coronal inclination of the approximation plane in the medial proximal tibia (coronal inclination), and internal knee joint moments. The KAM means the external moments balanced with the internal knee abduction moments. RESULTS: The advanced OA showed a larger internal abduction moment (p = 0.017) at the loading response than the other groups. The larger FTA and steeper coronal inclination correlated with the larger internal abduction moment (FTA, p < 0.001; coronal inclination, p = 0.003) at the loading response. CONCLUSIONS: As the clinical relevance, the association among the coronal inclination of the medial proximal tibia, lower extremity alignment, and KAM is one of the key factors to help better understand the etiology of knee OA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
Authors: Kendal A Marriott; Trevor B Birmingham; Kristyn M Leitch; Ryan Pinto; J Robert Giffin Journal: J Biomech Date: 2019-07-25 Impact factor: 2.712
Authors: Michael T Hirschmann; Lukas B Moser; Felix Amsler; Henrik Behrend; Vincent Leclercq; Silvan Hess Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2019-04-12 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Michael T Hirschmann; Lukas B Moser; Felix Amsler; Henrik Behrend; Vincent Leclerq; Silvan Hess Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2019-04-11 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Monica R Maly; Stacey M Acker; Saara Totterman; José Tamez-Peña; Paul W Stratford; Jack P Callaghan; Jonathan D Adachi; Karen A Beattie Journal: J Biomech Date: 2015-05-06 Impact factor: 2.712
Authors: Lucas Beckers; Jacobus H Müller; Jeremy Daxhelet; Salvatore Ratano; Mo Saffarini; Tarik Aït-Si-Selmi; Michel P Bonnin Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2021-06-01 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Lucas Beckers; Jacobus H Müller; Jeremy Daxhelet; Mo Saffarini; Tarik Aït-Si-Selmi; Michel P Bonnin Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2021-01-29 Impact factor: 4.342