| Literature DB >> 33067549 |
Jin Huang1,2, Zhonghui Ling1, Hong Zhong3, Yadong Yin1, Yating Qian1, Mingming Gao1,3, Hongjuan Ding1, Qing Cheng4, Ruizhe Jia5.
Abstract
This study sought to identify potential bioactive peptides from the placenta that are involved in preeclampsia (PE) to obtain information about the prediction, diagnosis and treatment of PE. The liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry was used to perform a comparative analysis of placental peptides in normal and PE pregnancies. Gene ontology (GO), pathway analysis and ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA) were used to evaluate the underlying biological function of the differential peptides based on their protein precursors. Transwell assays and qPCR were used to study the effect of the identified bioactive peptides on the function of HTR-8/SVneo cells. A total of 392 upregulated peptides and 420 downregulated peptides were identified (absolute fold change ≥ 2 and adjusted P value < 0.05). The GO analysis, pathway analysis, and IPA revealed that these differentially expressed peptides play a role in PE. In addition, the up-regulated peptide "DQSATALHFLGRVANPLSTA" derived from Angiotensinogen exhibited effect on the invasiveness of HTR-8/SVneo cells. The current preliminary research not only provides a new research direction for studying the pathogenesis of PE, but also brings new insights for the prediction, diagnosis and treatment of PE.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33067549 PMCID: PMC7567870 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-74840-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Comparison of characteristics between PE and normal pregnancies.
| Clinical features | PE (n = 3) | Normal pregnancy (n = 3) |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 25.67 ± 2.51 | 30.33 ± 5.85 |
| Number of pregnancies | 1.67 ± 0.58 | 1.67 ± 0.58 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 27.76 ± 3.66 | 29.39 ± 2.01 |
| Gestation week | 33.07 ± 2.60 | 38.43 ± 0.05 |
| Systolic pressure (mmHg) | 144.33 ± 12.85 | 113.33 ± 5.77 |
| Diastolic pressure (mmHg) | 101.67 ± 7.23a | 74.00 ± 4.58 |
| Proteinuria level (mg/24 h) | 8436.07 ± 3192.05a | N/A |
| Mode of delivery CS (%) | 100 | 100 |
| Birth weight (g) | 1960 ± 814.06 | 3110.00 ± 226.05 |
| Number of female fetuses | 2 | 3 |
| Apgar score | 9.67 ± 814.06 | 10.00 ± 0.00 |
PE preeclampsia; BMI body mass index; CS cesarean section; N/A not applicable.
aP < 0.05 when compared with normal pregnancy group.
Figure 1Differentially expressed peptides in healthy pregnant women and pregnant women with PE. The heatmap (A) and volcano plot (B) for the 812 peptides (absolute fold change ≥ 2 and adjusted P value < 0.05).
Top 10 differentially expressed peptides between PE and normal pregnancies.
| Parent protein | Peptide | Fold change | Q-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transglutaminase 2 (TGM2) | RALLVEPVINSY | 4.27 | < 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Nucleolin (NCL) | STWSGESKTLVLSNL | 4.11 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
| Tripeptidyl peptidase 1 (TPP1) | STPVFGGILSLINEH | 4.08 | 0.011 | 0.026 |
| Chorionic somatomammotropin hormone 1 (CSH1) | DTNSHNHDALLKNYGLLY | 4.01 | 0.012 | 0.029 |
| Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) | ISPDRVYINYY | 3.76 | 0.018 | 0.039 |
| Protein disulfide-isomerase A3 (PDIA3) | GVSGYPTLKI | 3.73 | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Acidic ribosomal protein P1 (RPLP) | AGVNVEPFWPGLFAKAL | 3.71 | 0.006 | 0.016 |
| Histone H1.2 (HIST1H1C) | GTLVQTKGTGASGSF | − 3.72 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
| Transglutaminase 2 (TGM2) | LQNPLPVALEGC | − 3.60 | < 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Neutrophil defensin 1 (DEFA1) | GTLVQTKGTGASGSF | − 3.54 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
Figure 2Features of the differentially expressed peptides. (A) Molecular weights (MWs) of the peptides. (B) Isoelectric points (pIs) of the peptides. (C) Scatter plot for the MWs versus the pIs. (D) Distributions of N-terminal (i.e. left-side) and C-terminal (i.e. right-side) amino acids of the identified peptides.
Figure 3Gene ontology and pathway analysis of the precursor proteins of the differentially expressed peptides. (A) The biological process categories. (B) The cellular component categories. (C) The molecular function categories. (D) Canonical signaling pathways[43].
Figure 4Pathway of the peptide precursors.
Figure 5Interaction network of the peptide precursors. Protein network interaction map. The interaction line between orange and blue indicates the predicted activity state; orange indicates activation, blue indicates inhibition, and yellow indicates that the activity status of the target gene network regulated by the two regulators is inconsistent. The gray line indicates that the relationship is not quantified. Experimental validation or a clear quantitative relationship between protein–protein interactions.
Figure 6Function analysis of the peptide “DQSATALHFLGRVANPLSTA.” (A) Quantitative PCR, (B,C) Transwell assay. NC negative control.