Kacie M Kidd1, Gina M Sequeira2, Taylor Paglisotti2, Sabra L Katz-Wise3, Traci M Kazmerski2, Amy Hillier4, Elizabeth Miller2, Nadia Dowshen5. 1. UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: Kacie.Kidd2@chp.edu. 2. UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 3. Boston Children's Hospital, Division of Adolescent/Young Adult Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts. 4. University of Pennsylvania, School of Social Policy & Practice, Colonial Penn Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 5. University of Pennsylvania, School of Medicine, Colonial Penn Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Numerous U.S. state legislatures have proposed bills to ban gender-affirming medical interventions for minors. Parents and caregivers play a critical role in advocating for and supporting their transgender and gender-diverse youth (TGDY). We aimed to understand parent and caregiver perspectives about this potential legislation and perceived effects on their TGDY's mental health. METHODS: We developed and launched a social-media based, anonymous online survey in February 2020 to assess parent and caregiver perspectives on proposed laws to ban gender-affirming medical interventions for minors. Participants were asked to respond to two open-ended questions about these laws; responses were coded to identify key themes. RESULTS: We analyzed responses from 273 participants from 43 states. Most identified as white (86.4%) female (90.0%) mothers (93.8%), and 83.6% of their TGDY had received gender-affirming medical interventions before age 18 years. The most salient theme, which appeared in the majority of responses, described parent and caregiver fears that these laws would lead to worsening mental health and suicide for their TGDY. Additional themes included a fear that their TGDY would face increased discrimination, lose access to gender-affirming medical interventions, and lose autonomy over medical decision-making due to government overreach. CONCLUSIONS: In this convenience sample, parents and caregivers overwhelmingly expressed fear that the proposed legislation will lead to worsening mental health and increased suicidal ideation for their TGDY. They implored lawmakers to hear their stories and to leave critical decisions about gender-affirming medical interventions to families and their medical providers.
OBJECTIVES: Numerous U.S. state legislatures have proposed bills to ban gender-affirming medical interventions for minors. Parents and caregivers play a critical role in advocating for and supporting their transgender and gender-diverse youth (TGDY). We aimed to understand parent and caregiver perspectives about this potential legislation and perceived effects on their TGDY's mental health. METHODS: We developed and launched a social-media based, anonymous online survey in February 2020 to assess parent and caregiver perspectives on proposed laws to ban gender-affirming medical interventions for minors. Participants were asked to respond to two open-ended questions about these laws; responses were coded to identify key themes. RESULTS: We analyzed responses from 273 participants from 43 states. Most identified as white (86.4%) female (90.0%) mothers (93.8%), and 83.6% of their TGDY had received gender-affirming medical interventions before age 18 years. The most salient theme, which appeared in the majority of responses, described parent and caregiver fears that these laws would lead to worsening mental health and suicide for their TGDY. Additional themes included a fear that their TGDY would face increased discrimination, lose access to gender-affirming medical interventions, and lose autonomy over medical decision-making due to government overreach. CONCLUSIONS: In this convenience sample, parents and caregivers overwhelmingly expressed fear that the proposed legislation will lead to worsening mental health and increased suicidal ideation for their TGDY. They implored lawmakers to hear their stories and to leave critical decisions about gender-affirming medical interventions to families and their medical providers.
Authors: Wylie C Hembree; Peggy T Cohen-Kettenis; Louis Gooren; Sabine E Hannema; Walter J Meyer; M Hassan Murad; Stephen M Rosenthal; Joshua D Safer; Vin Tangpricha; Guy G T'Sjoen Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Amaya Perez-Brumer; Jack K Day; Stephen T Russell; Mark L Hatzenbuehler Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2017-07-05 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Amy L Gower; G Nic Rider; Camille Brown; Barbara J McMorris; Eli Coleman; Lindsay A Taliaferro; Marla E Eisenberg Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2018-10-19 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Rosalia Costa; Michael Dunsford; Elin Skagerberg; Victoria Holt; Polly Carmichael; Marco Colizzi Journal: J Sex Med Date: 2015-11-09 Impact factor: 3.802
Authors: Michelle M Johns; Richard Lowry; Jack Andrzejewski; Lisa C Barrios; Zewditu Demissie; Timothy McManus; Catherine N Rasberry; Leah Robin; J Michael Underwood Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2019-01-25 Impact factor: 17.586
Authors: Landon D Hughes; Nadia Dowshen; Kacie M Kidd; Don Operario; Christopher Renjilian; Kristi E Gamarel Journal: LGBT Health Date: 2022-04-01 Impact factor: 5.150
Authors: Megan E Gandy; Kacie M Kidd; James Weiss; Judith Leitch; Xavier Hersom Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-12-02 Impact factor: 3.390