Literature DB >> 33067016

Hood Technique for Robotic Radical Prostatectomy-Preserving Periurethral Anatomical Structures in the Space of Retzius and Sparing the Pouch of Douglas, Enabling Early Return of Continence Without Compromising Surgical Margin Rates.

Vinayak G Wagaskar1, Ankur Mittal2, Stanislaw Sobotka3, Parita Ratnani3, Anna Lantz3, Ugo Giovanni Falagario3, Alberto Martini3, Zach Dovey3, Patrick-Julien Treacy3, Prachee Pathak3, Suit Nair3, Berryhill Roy3, Dimple Chakravarty3, Sara Lewis4, Kenneth Haines5, Peter Wiklund3, Ash Tewari3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A common side effect following radical prostatectomy is urinary incontinence. Here, we describe a novel surgical technique to reduce postoperative urinary incontinence and facilitate early return of continence.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the novel "hood technique" for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This is an institutional review board-approved prospective study of 300 patients (median age 64 yr) with localized prostate cancer treated with the RARP hood technique at a major urban hospital between April 2018 and March 2019. The exclusion criteria were as follows: patients with anterior tumor location based on biopsy or multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. All but one patient participated in follow-up over 12 mo after the procedure. SURGICAL PROCEDURE: The RARP "hood technique" was performed to preserve the detrusor apron, puboprostatic ligament complex, arcus tendineus, endopelvic fascia, and pouch of Douglas. MEASUREMENTS: Clinical data collected included pre- and intraoperative variables, and postoperative functional and oncological outcomes and complications. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Continence rates at 1, 2, 4, 6 12, 24, and 48 wk after catheter removal were 21%, 36%, 83%, 88%, 91%, 94%, and 95%, respectively. Positive surgical margin rate was 6%. Thirty patients (9.7%) experienced complications after RARP: 17 (5.7%), 11 (3.6%), and one (0.4%) had Clavien-Dindo grade I, II, and III complications, respectively. This study was conducted within a single health system and may not be generalizable. The study lacked randomization and a comparative arm.
CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate that the hood technique spares musculofascial structures anterior to the urethral sphincter complex with early return of continence after surgery, without compromising positive surgical margin rates. Exclusion of anterior tumor location contributed to a reduction in positive surgical margins. PATIENT
SUMMARY: By better preservation of anatomical structures around the urethra, we were able to achieve early return of urinary continence without a negative impact on complications and cancer outcomes. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Margins of excision; Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging; Prostatectomy; Quality of life; Urinary incontinence

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33067016     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.09.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  7 in total

1.  Endopelvic Fascia Sparing Robotic Radical Cystectomy with Intracorporeal Studer Pouch with Balbay's Technique.

Authors:  Mevlana Derya Balbay; Ersin Köseoğlu; Abdullah Erdem Canda; Arif Özkan; Mert Kılıç; Murat Can Kiremit; Ahmet Musaoğlu; Kayhan Tarım; Ahmet Furkan Sarıkaya
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2022 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.789

2.  Independent Factors Affecting Postoperative Short-Term Urinary Continence Recovery after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Wen Deng; Ru Chen; Xian Jiang; Ping Zheng; Ke Zhu; Xiaochen Zhou; Xiaoqiang Liu; Ju Guo; Luyao Chen; Gongxian Wang; Bin Fu
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2021-11-28       Impact factor: 4.375

3.  Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy versus standard laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: an evidence-based analysis of comparative outcomes.

Authors:  Umberto Carbonara; Maya Srinath; Fabio Crocerossa; Matteo Ferro; Francesco Cantiello; Giuseppe Lucarelli; Francesco Porpiglia; Michele Battaglia; Pasquale Ditonno; Riccardo Autorino
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-04-11       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Quantib Prostate Compared to an Expert Radiologist for the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer on mpMRI: A Single-Center Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Eliodoro Faiella; Daniele Vertulli; Francesco Esperto; Ermanno Cordelli; Paolo Soda; Rosa Maria Muraca; Lorenzo Paolo Moramarco; Rosario Francesco Grasso; Bruno Beomonte Zobel; Domiziana Santucci
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2022-08-13

5.  Technical Tips in Managing Large Median Lobes During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Vinayak G Wagaskar; Osama Zaytoun; Priyanka Kale; Adriana Pedraza; Dallin Busby; Avinash Reddy; Ash Tewari
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2022-09-23

6.  A 4K score/MRI-based nomogram for predicting prostate cancer, clinically significant prostate cancer, and unfavorable prostate cancer.

Authors:  Vinayak G Wagaskar; Stanislaw Sobotka; Parita Ratnani; James Young; Anna Lantz; Sneha Parekh; Ugo Giovanni Falagario; Li Li; Sara Lewis; Kenneth Haines; Sanoj Punnen; Peter Wiklund; Ash Tewari
Journal:  Cancer Rep (Hoboken)       Date:  2021-03-04

Review 7.  Anatomical Fundamentals and Current Surgical Knowledge of Prostate Anatomy Related to Functional and Oncological Outcomes for Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Benedikt Hoeh; Mike Wenzel; Lukas Hohenhorst; Jens Köllermann; Markus Graefen; Alexander Haese; Derya Tilki; Jochen Walz; Marina Kosiba; Andreas Becker; Severine Banek; Luis A Kluth; Philipp Mandel; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Felix K H Chun; Felix Preisser
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-02-22
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.