| Literature DB >> 33066684 |
Anzhelika Vorobyeva1,2, Ekaterina Bezverkhniaia2,3, Elena Konovalova4, Alexey Schulga2,4, Javad Garousi1, Olga Vorontsova1, Ayman Abouzayed5, Anna Orlova2,5,6, Sergey Deyev2,4,7,8, Vladimir Tolmachev1,2.
Abstract
Efficient treatment of disseminated triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) remains an unmet clinical need. The epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) is often overexpressed on the surface of TNBC cells, which makes EpCAM a potential therapeutic target. Radionuclide molecular imaging of EpCAM expression might permit selection of patients for EpCAM-targeting therapies. In this study, we evaluated a scaffold protein, designed ankyrin repeat protein (DARPin) Ec1, for imaging of EpCAM in TNBC. DARPin Ec1 was labeled with a non-residualizing [125I]I-para-iodobenzoate (PIB) label and a residualizing [99mTc]Tc(CO)3 label. Both imaging probes retained high binding specificity and affinity to EpCAM-expressing MDA-MB-468 TNBC cells after labeling. Internalization studies showed that Ec1 was retained on the surface of MDA-MB-468 cells to a high degree up to 24 h. Biodistribution in Balb/c nu/nu mice bearing MDA-MB-468 xenografts demonstrated specific uptake of both [125I]I-PIB-Ec1 and [99mTc]Tc(CO)3-Ec1 in TNBC tumors. [125I]I-PIB-Ec1 had appreciably lower uptake in normal organs compared with [99mTc]Tc(CO)3-Ec1, which resulted in significantly (p < 0.05) higher tumor-to-organ ratios. The biodistribution data were confirmed by micro-Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography/Computed Tomography (microSPECT/CT) imaging. In conclusion, an indirectly radioiodinated Ec1 is the preferable probe for imaging of EpCAM in TNBC.Entities:
Keywords: EpCAM; PIB; SPECT; breast; cancer; iodine; molecular imaging; radionuclide
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33066684 PMCID: PMC7587533 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25204719
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Labeling and characterization of radiolabeled Ec1 variants.
| DARPins | Radiochemical | Radiochemical | Radiochemical Purity (%) | Binding Affinity to |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [125I]I-PIB-Ec1 | 23 ± 2 ( | 19 ± 1 ( | 99 ± 0 ( | 121 ± 21 ( |
| [99mTc]Tc(CO)3-Ec1 | 92 ± 1 ( | 69 ± 7 ( | 99 ± 0 ( | 58 ± 5 ( |
In vitro stability of [99mTc]Tc(CO)3-Ec1.
| Protein-Associated Activity, % | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1000× Histidine | PBS | |
| 1 h | 99 ± 0 | 99 ± 0 |
| 4 h | 99 ± 0 | 99 ± 1 |
| 24 h | 98 ± 0 | 99 ± 1 |
Samples were incubated in PBS or with 1000-fold molar excess of histidine at 37 °C. Analysis was performed in duplicates.
In vitro stability of [125I]I-PIB-Ec1.
| Protein-Associated Activity, % | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1000× NaI | 30% EtOH | PBS | |
| 1 h | 98 ± 1 | 99 ± 0 | 99 ± 0 |
| 4 h | 99 ± 0 | 99 ± 0 | 99 ± 0 |
| 24 h | 99 ± 0 | 98 ± 0 | 99 ± 0 |
Samples were incubated in PBS, 30% ethanol or with 1000-fold molar excess of NaI at 37 °C. Analysis was performed in duplicates.
Figure 1In vitro specificity of epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) targeting using [99mTc]Tc(CO)3-Ec1 (A) and [125I]I-PIB-Ec1 (B) in EpCAM-expressing MDA-MB-468 cells. Uptake by cells was significantly (p < 0.001) reduced when 100-fold molar excess of nonlabeled Ec1 designed ankyrin repeat protein (DARPin) was added to the blocked groups. Final concentration of radiolabeled compound was 2 nM. Data are presented as mean from three samples ± SD.
Figure 2LigandTracer sensorgrams of [99mTc]Tc(CO)3-Ec1 (A) and [125I]I-PIB-Ec1 (B) binding to MDA-MB-468 cells. The association was measured at 0.2, 0.6, and 1.8 nM concentrations for [99mTc]Tc(CO)3-Ec1 and at 1.8, 5.4, and 14.5 nM concentrations [125I]I-PIB-Ec1.
Figure 3Cellular processing of [99mTc]Tc(CO)3-Ec1 (A) and [125I]I-PIB-Ec1 (B) by MDA-MB-468 cells during continuous incubation. Cells were incubated with the DARPins (1 nM) at 37 °C. Data are presented as the mean of three samples ± standard deviation (SD). Error bars might not be seen when they are smaller than data point symbols.
Figure 4Cellular retention of activity after interrupted incubation of [99mTc]Tc(CO)3-Ec1 (A) and [125I]I-PIB-Ec1 (B) with MDA-MB-468 cells. Cells were first incubated with the DARPin variants (10 nM) at 4 °C for 1 h and then the media were exchanged and the cells were incubated at 37 °C for 1, 4, or 24 h. A fraction of the supernatant at every time point was analyzed using NAP-5 size-exclusion columns and compared to the control when the radiolabeled DARPins were incubated in complete media for 24 h (C,D). Numbers in panels (C,D) show a percentage of activity associated with low-molecular-weight compounds at each time point. Data for retention are presented as the mean of three samples ± SD and data for NAP-5 analysis are presented as the mean of two samples ± SD. LMW = low molecular weight, HMW = high molecular weight. Error bars might not be seen when they are smaller than data point symbols.
Figure 5In vivo specificity of EpCAM targeting using [99mTc]Tc(CO)3-Ec1 (A) and [125I]I-PIB-Ec1 (B). Uptake of both DARPin variants was significantly (p < 0.01, unpaired t-test) higher in EpCAM-positive MDA-MB-468 xenografts than in EpCAM-negative Ramos xenografts 6 h post injection (pi). EpCAM blocking in MDA-MB-468 xenografts by co-injecting a large excess of unlabeled Ec1 also resulted in a significant decrease of tracer uptake. Data are presented as mean ± SD for four mice.
Biodistribution of [99mTc]Tc(CO)3-Ec1 and [125I]I-PIB-Ec1 in Balb/c nu/nu mice bearing MDA-MB-468 xenografts 6 and 24 h pi.
| Tissue | [99mTc]Tc(CO)3-Ec1 | [125I]I-PIB-Ec1 | [99mTc]Tc(CO)3-Ec1 | [125I]I-PIB-Ec1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 h | 24 h | |||
| Blood | 0.24 ± 0.03 | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 0.11 ± 0.01 | 0.009 ± 0.001 |
| Salivary glands | 1.7 ± 0.2 | 0.11 ± 0.04 | 1.3 ± 0.3 | NM |
| Lungs | 0.9 ± 0.2 | 0.23 ± 0.03 | 0.6 ± 0.2 | 0.04 ± 0.01 |
| Liver | 18 ± 2 | 0.11 ± 0.02 | 9 ± 2 | 0.026 ± 0.002 |
| Spleen | 3.1 ± 0.3 | 0.10 ± 0.02 | 2.2 ± 0.3 | 0.044 ± 0.003 |
| Pancreas | 1.2 ± 0.2 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 0.8 ± 0.2 | NM |
| Small intestine | 1.5 ± 0.3 | 0.11 ± 0.04 | 0.9 ± 0.3 | NM |
| Stomach | 1.8 ± 0.4 | 0.15 ± 0.03 | 0.9 ± 0.2 | NM |
| Kidney | 192 ± 15 | 2.7 ± 1.0 | 114 ± 13 | 0.08 ± 0.01 |
| Tumor | 2.6 ± 0.2 | 1.7 ± 0.2 | 1.5 ± 0.5 | 0.27 ± 0.05 |
| Muscle | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 0.3 ± 0.1 | NM |
| Bone | 1.9 ± 0.3 | 0.9 ± 0.2 | 1.2 ± 0.3 | 0.5 ± 0.2 |
| Intestines with content | 1.8 ± 0.3 | 0.4 ± 0.1 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 0.07 ± 0.01 |
| Rest of the body | 11.6 ± 1.2 | 1.7 ± 0.2 | 8.5 ± 1.5 | 0.9 ± 0.2 |
Data are presented as mean percent of injected dose (%ID)/g ± SD for four mice. Data for the rest of the intestines with contents and rest of the body are presented as %ID per whole sample. Significant difference between [99mTc]Tc and [125I]I at the same time point (paired t-test). Significant difference between values for [99mTc]Tc at 6- and 24-h time point (unpaired t-test). Significant difference between values for [125I]I at 6- and 24-h time point (unpaired t-test). NM = nonmeasurable.
Tumor-to-organ ratios of [99mTc]Tc(CO)3-Ec1 and [125I]I-PIB-Ec1 in Balb/C nu/nu mice bearing MDA-MB-468 xenografts at 6 and 24 h pi.
| Tissue | [99mTc]Tc(CO)3-Ec1 | [125I]I-PIB-Ec1 | [99mTc]Tc(CO)3-Ec1 | [125I]I-PIB-Ec1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 h | 24 h | |||
| Blood | 11 ± 1 | 19 ± 3 | 13 ± 4 | 31 ± 6 |
| Salivary glands | 1.5 ± 0.1 | 17 ± 6 | 1.2 ± 0.3 | NM |
| Lungs | 3 ± 1 | 8 ± 2 | 3 ± 1 | NM |
| Liver | 0.14 ± 0.01 | 15 ± 2 | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 10 ± 1 |
| Spleen | 0.8 ± 0.1 | 18 ± 5 | 0.7 ± 0.2 | NM |
| Pancreas | 2.1 ± 0.2 | 43 ± 8 | 2 ± 1 | NM |
| Small intestine | 1.7 ± 0.4 | 17 ± 6 | 2 ± 1 | NM |
| Stomach | 1.4 ± 0.3 | 12 ± 4 | 2 ± 1 | NM |
| Kidney | 0.013 ± 0.002 | 0.7 ± 0.3 | 0.014 ± 0.005 | 3.5 ± 0.5 |
| Muscle | 5 ± 1 | 42 ± 10 | 5 ± 1 | NM |
| Bone | 1.3 ± 0.2 | 2 ± 1 | 1.3 ± 0.4 | 0.5 ± 0.1 |
Data are presented as mean ± SD for four mice. Significant difference between [125I]I and [99mTc]Tc at the same time point (paired t-test). Significant difference between values for [99mTc]Tc at 6- and 24-h (unpaired t-test). Significant difference between values for [125I]I at 6- and 24-h (unpaired t-test). NM= nonmeasurable.
Figure 6Micro-Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography/Computed Tomography (microSPECT/CT) imaging of EpCAM expression in BALB/C nu/nu mice bearing EpCAM-positive MDA-MB-468 xenografts at 6 h pi using [99mTc]Tc(CO)3-Ec1 (A) and [125I]I-PIB-Ec (B). Arrows indicate: T—tumor, K—kidneys, L—liver, LN—lymph node. The scale in panel A was adjusted to the first red pixel in the tumor.