| Literature DB >> 33066394 |
Nikolay I Gorshkov1, Andrey Yu Murko1, Irina I Gavrilova1, Marina A Bezrukova1, Albert I Kipper1, Valerii D Krasikov1, Evgenii F Panarin1.
Abstract
Dithiocarbamate (Entities:
Keywords: N-vinylpyrrolidone copolymers; dithiocarbamate; gallium; indium; metal–polymer complexes
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33066394 PMCID: PMC7587350 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25204681
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Scheme 1Synthesis of VP–VDTC copolymers.
Figure 1IR spectra (KBr pellets) of VP–VA∙HCl (grey) andVP–VDTC (green).
Figure 2Size exclusion chromatography (SEC) profiles of the VP–VFA (1—solid line), VP–VA∙HCl (2—dashed line), and VP–VDTC (3—dash-dotted line) copolymers (Mr = 12 × 103 Da, 6 mol.% of NH2 groups). Ultrahydrogel linear column (7.8 × 300 mm) with a pre-column (0.6 × 40 mm). Eluent: aqueous solution of 0.2 M NaCl, λ = 210 nm.
Figure 3UV spectra of indium-iminodiacetic acid—dithiocarbamate (IDADTC) complexes of different stoichiometries. Concentration of IDADTC is 1 × 10−4 mol/L (water).
Figure 4Representative fragment of 13C NMR spectra (D2O) of IDADTC (solid line) and complex with indiumin 1:3 ratio (dotted line) (characteristic shift of CSS resonance).
Figure 5Study of complexation between gallium and IDADTC ligand system by UV spectroscopy. The L:Ga ratio is 1-1 ÷ 1-3. Concentration of IDADTC is 1 × 10−4 mol/L.
Figure 6Study of complexation of VP–VDTC (Mr = 12 × 103 Da, 18 mol.% of VDTC) with gallium and indium by UV spectroscopy in aqueous solutions. 1—initial copolymer; 2—MPC with indium; 3—MPC with gallium. Concentration of VP–VDTC is 1 × 10−4 mol/L.
Figure 7IR-spectra (KBr pellets) of 1—VP–VDTC (red); 2—VP–VDTC–In (black).
Figure 8SEC chromatograms of the VP–VDTC (1—solid line), VP–VDTC–In (2—dashed line) copolymers (Mr = 12 × 103 Da, 6 mol.% of NH2 groups). Ultrahydrogel linear column (7.8 × 300 mm) with a pre-column (0.6 × 40 mm). Eluent: aqueous solution of 0.2 M NaCl, λ = 210 nm.
Molecular characteristics of VP–VDTC copolymers and their MPC with indium in 0.2 M NaCl.
| Sample | Composition, mol.% | [η], dl/g | MsD, kDa | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VP–VA∙HCl | 94–6 | 0.17 | 7.47 | 0.9 | 27 | 3.3 | 0.154 | 3.32 |
| VP–VDTC | 94–6 | 0.16 | 7.49 | - | - | 4.1 | 0.157 | - |
| VP–VDTC -In | 94–6 | 0.09 | 7.1 | 0.2 | 32 | 1.9 | 0.171 | 3.40 |
| VP–VA∙HCl | 94–6 | 0.10 | 10.94 | 1.2 | 12 | 3.3 | 0.155 | 3.96 |
| VP–VDTC | 94–6 | 0.10 | 10.61 | - | - | 3.8 | 0.158 | - |
| VP–VDTC -In | 94–6 | 0.07 | 10.19 | 2.0 | 14 | 2.4 | 0.178 | 4.00 |
Calculated using hydrodynamic invariant A0. Sample: VP–VDTC copolymer; [η] is the intrinsic viscosity; D is the coefficient of isothermal translational diffusion; S is the sedimentation coefficient; Rh is the hydrodynamic radius; dn/dc is the refractive index increment.
Scheme 2Proposed coordination environment of metal ion inside VP–VDTC polymeric coil.
Figure 9UV–vis spectra in PBS of 1—VP–VDTC; 2—VP–VDTC–Ga; 3—VP–VDTC–Ga with 20 molar excess of histidine.
Figure 10UV–vis spectra in PBS of 1—VP–VDTC; 2—VPVDTC–In; 3—VP–VDTC–In with 20 molar excess of histidine.