| Literature DB >> 33066006 |
Bo Li1, Qingfeng Cao2, Muhammad Mohiuddin3.
Abstract
With rapid urbanization, the air pollution issue is becoming an increasingly serious issue given that people are strongly swayed in their location choice to settle down in a growing urban area where most job opportunities have been created. This study investigated the influences of both air quality and income on the settlement intentions of Chinese migrants by using microlevel samples of the China Migrants Dynamic Survey (CMDS) data from 2017 and the annual average concentration of PM2.5 (particles with diameter ≤ 2.5 μm in the air) to measure a city's air quality. The results showed that the settlement decisions of Chinese migrants involved a trade-off between income and air quality. Poorer air quality could significantly decrease the settlement intention, while a higher income could significantly increase the settlement intention of Chinese migrants. However, as the migrants' income opportunity increased at a location, the negative influence of poorer air quality on the settlement intention at that location gradually declined. Specifically, when deciding whether to settle down in cities, the migrants with a non-agricultural "hukou" (household registration) tended to pay more attention to air quality than the migrants with an agricultural "hukou," and migrants who moved farther away in geographic distance tended to pay more attention to income. It was concluded that the influences of air quality and income on the settlement intentions of the migrants were robust and consistent after using different estimation methods and considering the issue of endogeneity.Entities:
Keywords: air quality; income; migrants; settlement intention
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33066006 PMCID: PMC7600668 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17207432
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
The proportions of migrants with different levels of education who had settlement intentions.
| Level of Education | Proportion |
|---|---|
| Never gone to school | 19.22% |
| Primary school | 17.82% |
| Junior high school | 21.31% |
| Senior high school | 30.51% |
| Junior college | 44.27% |
| Undergraduate | 52.71% |
| Graduate or above | 58.84% |
Definitions of variables.
| Variable Name | Variable Definitions |
|---|---|
|
| Binary dummy variable, standing for settlement intention of the migrant. If migrant |
|
| Air quality of cities, measured using the annual average PM2.5 concentration (μg/m3) of the Chinese city where the migrant resides. |
|
| Monthly personal income in the immigratory city of the migrant (10,000 yuan) |
|
| Dummy variable, the national/ethnic group of the migrant: ethnic Han = 1, others = 0. |
|
| Dummy variable, gender of the migrant: male = 1, female = 0. |
|
| Age of the migrant (years). |
|
| Dummy variable, marital status of the migrant: married = 1, unmarried = 0. |
|
| Dummy variable, political identity of the migrant: China Communist Party (CCP) member or Chinese Communist Youth League (CCYL) member = 1, otherwise = 0. |
|
| Level of education, measured in terms of the educated years of the migrant: never gone to school = 0 year, primary school = 6 years, junior high school = 9 years, senior high school = 12 years, junior college = 15 years, undergraduate = 16 years, graduate or above = 19 years. |
|
| Dummy variable, the “hukou” status of the migrant: non-agricultural “hukou” = 1, agricultural “hukou” = 0. |
|
| Duration of residence in the immigratory city of the migrant (year). |
|
| Dummy variable, spatial distance of migration for the migrant: migration crossing provincial border = 1, others = 0. |
|
| Dummy variable, spatial distance of migration for the migrant: migration crossing city border = 1, others = 0. |
|
| Dummy variable, spatial distance of migration for the migrant: migration crossing county border = 1, others = 0. |
|
| Dummy variable, reason for migration for the migrant: economic purpose (work or business) = 1, non-economic purpose (trailing family member, marriage, or other reasons) = 0. |
|
| The proportion of tertiary industries in the city where the migrant resides in (%), expressed as the ratio between output value of the tertiary industry and the GDP. |
|
| Dependence degree on the trade of the city where the migrant resides in (%), expressed as the ratio of the total export and import volumes to the GDP. |
|
| Per capita GDP of the city where the migrant resides in (10,000 yuan). |
|
| GDP growth rate of the city where the migrant resides in (10,000 yuan). |
Descriptive statistics of the variables.
| Variable | Observations | Mean | Standard Deviation | Minimum | Maximum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 123,338 | 0.279 | 0.449 | 0.000 | 1.000 |
|
| 123,338 | 45.802 | 14.208 | 10.016 | 80.657 |
|
| 123,338 | 0.424 | 0.280 | 0.020 | 2.000 |
|
| 123,338 | 0.928 | 0.258 | 0.000 | 1.000 |
|
| 123,338 | 0.568 | 0.495 | 0.000 | 1.000 |
|
| 123,338 | 36.801 | 9.765 | 16.000 | 85.000 |
|
| 123,338 | 0.804 | 0.397 | 0.000 | 1.000 |
|
| 123,338 | 0.109 | 0.311 | 0.000 | 1.000 |
|
| 123,338 | 10.385 | 3.272 | 0.000 | 19.000 |
|
| 123,338 | 0.219 | 0.414 | 0.000 | 1.000 |
|
| 123,338 | 7.164 | 5.895 | 1.000 | 58.000 |
|
| 123,338 | 0.495 | 0.500 | 0.000 | 1.000 |
|
| 123,338 | 0.330 | 0.470 | 0.000 | 1.000 |
|
| 123,338 | 0.174 | 0.380 | 0.000 | 1.000 |
|
| 123,338 | 0.927 | 0.260 | 0.000 | 1.000 |
|
| 123,338 | 52.384 | 11.507 | 1.907 | 80.603 |
|
| 123,338 | 34.520 | 37.228 | 0.055 | 161.271 |
|
| 123,338 | 6.140 | 2.716 | 0.988 | 13.110 |
|
| 123,338 | 7.476 | 1.732 | −2.800 | 12.300 |
Results of baseline regression for factors influencing the settlement intentions of Chinese migrants in cities.
| Variables | Model (1) | Model (2) |
|---|---|---|
|
| −0.003 ** | −0.005 *** |
| (0.001) | (0.001) | |
|
| 0.004 ** | |
| (0.002) | ||
|
| 0.755 *** | 0.561 *** |
| (0.027) | (0.090) | |
|
| −0.103 *** | −0.102 *** |
| (0.029) | (0.029) | |
|
| −0.238 *** | −0.238 *** |
| (0.015) | (0.015) | |
|
| 0.013 ** | 0.013 ** |
| (0.006) | (0.006) | |
|
| −0.000 ** | −0.000 ** |
| (0.000) | (0.000) | |
|
| 0.593 *** | 0.593 *** |
| (0.024) | (0.024) | |
|
| 0.120 *** | 0.120 *** |
| (0.024) | (0.024) | |
|
| 0.139 *** | 0.138 *** |
| (0.003) | (0.003) | |
|
| 0.390 *** | 0.390 *** |
| (0.018) | (0.018) | |
|
| 0.064 *** | 0.064 *** |
| (0.001) | (0.001) | |
|
| 0.592 *** | 0.591 *** |
| (0.019) | (0.019) | |
|
| 0.873 *** | 0.873 *** |
| (0.024) | (0.024) | |
|
| −0.800 *** | −0.799 *** |
| (0.026) | (0.026) | |
|
| 0.011 *** | 0.011 *** |
| (0.001) | (0.001) | |
|
| 0.001 *** | 0.001 *** |
| (0.000) | (0.000) | |
|
| 0.003 | 0.003 |
| (0.005) | (0.005) | |
|
| 0.041 *** | 0.041 *** |
| (0.008) | (0.008) | |
| Constant | −4.549 *** | −4.477 *** |
| (0.158) | (0.161) | |
| Province Fixed Effects | Yes | Yes |
| Observations | 123,338 | 123,338 |
| Pseudo R2 | 0.149 | 0.149 |
Note: The robust standard errors are given in parentheses, **, and *** indicate statistical significance at the 10%, 5%, and 1% levels, respectively. The abbreviations are defined in Table 2.
Figure 1Average marginal effects of PM2.5 with 90% confidence intervals.
Heterogeneity test for factors influencing the settlement intentions of Chinese migrants in cities with interaction terms included.
| Variables | (1) | (2) |
|---|---|---|
|
| −0.004 *** | −0.005 *** |
| (0.001) | (0.001) | |
|
| 0.0040 ** | |
| (0.002) | ||
|
| 0.0043 ** | |
| (0.002) | ||
|
| 0.003 * | |
| (0.002) | ||
|
| 0.005 *** | |
| (0.002) | ||
|
| 0.006 *** | |
| (0.002) | ||
|
| 0.563 *** | 0.552 *** |
| (0.090) | (0.090) | |
|
| −0.102 *** | −0.104 *** |
| (0.029) | (0.029) | |
|
| −0.238 *** | −0.240 *** |
| (0.015) | (0.015) | |
|
| 0.013 ** | 0.013 ** |
| (0.006) | (0.006) | |
|
| −0.000 ** | −0.000 ** |
| (0.000) | (0.000) | |
|
| 0.593 *** | 0.592 *** |
| (0.024) | (0.024) | |
|
| 0.120 *** | 0.120 *** |
| (0.024) | (0.024) | |
|
| 0.138 *** | 0.139 *** |
| (0.003) | (0.003) | |
|
| 0.383 *** | 0.392 *** |
| (0.028) | (0.018) | |
|
| 0.064 *** | 0.064 *** |
| (0.001) | (0.001) | |
|
| 0.591 *** | 0.549 *** |
| (0.019) | (0.028) | |
|
| 0.873 *** | 0.819 *** |
| (0.024) | (0.035) | |
|
| −0.799 *** | −0.799 *** |
| (0.026) | (0.026) | |
|
| 0.011 *** | 0.011 *** |
| (0.001) | (0.001) | |
|
| 0.001 *** | 0.001 *** |
| (0.000) | (0.000) | |
|
| 0.003 | 0.003 |
| (0.005) | (0.005) | |
|
| 0.041 *** | 0.041 *** |
| (0.008) | (0.008) | |
| Constant | −4.475 *** | −4.420 *** |
| (0.161) | (0.163) | |
| Province Fixed Effects | Yes | Yes |
| Observations | 123,338 | 123,338 |
| Pseudo R2 | 0.149 | 0.149 |
Note: The robust standard errors are given in parentheses. *, **, and *** indicate statistical significance at the 10%, 5%, and 1% levels, respectively. The abbreviations are defined in Table 2.
Figure 2Average marginal effects of PM2.5 with 90% confidence intervals for the migrants of different “hukous.”
Figure 3Average marginal effects of PM2.5 with 90% confidence intervals for migrants migrating over different migration distances.
Robustness test for the factors influencing the settlement intentions of Chinese migrants in cities using a probit regression model and the instrumental variables.
| Variables | (1) | (2) |
|---|---|---|
|
| −0.002 *** | −0.005 *** |
| (0.001) | (0.001) | |
|
| 0.003 *** | 0.002 ** |
| (0.001) | (0.001) | |
|
| 0.320 *** | 0.357 *** |
| (0.053) | (0.054) | |
|
| −0.058 *** | −0.061 *** |
| (0.017) | (0.017) | |
|
| −0.140 *** | −0.141 *** |
| (0.009) | (0.009) | |
|
| 0.008 ** | 0.008 ** |
| (0.003) | (0.003) | |
|
| −0.000 ** | −0.000 ** |
| (0.000) | (0.000) | |
|
| 0.331 *** | 0.336 *** |
| (0.014) | (0.014) | |
|
| 0.074 *** | 0.076 *** |
| (0.014) | (0.014) | |
|
| 0.080 *** | 0.080 *** |
| (0.002) | (0.002) | |
|
| 0.238 *** | 0.230 *** |
| (0.011) | (0.011) | |
|
| 0.037 *** | 0.037 *** |
| (0.001) | (0.001) | |
|
| 0.343 *** | 0.339 *** |
| (0.011) | (0.011) | |
|
| 0.510 *** | 0.502 *** |
| (0.014) | (0.014) | |
|
| −0.478 *** | −0.477 *** |
| (0.016) | (0.016) | |
|
| 0.006 *** | 0.006 *** |
| (0.001) | (0.001) | |
|
| 0.001 *** | 0.001 *** |
| (0.000) | (0.000) | |
|
| 0.002 | 0.002 |
| (0.003) | (0.003) | |
|
| 0.023 *** | 0.026 *** |
| (0.005) | (0.005) | |
| Constant | −2.600 *** | −2.487 *** |
| (0.093) | (0.094) | |
| Province Fixed Effects | Yes | Yes |
| Observations | 123,338 | 123,338 |
| Pseudo R2 | 0.149 | 0.148 |
Note: The robust standard errors are given in parentheses. **, and *** indicate statistical significance at the 10%, 5%, and 1% levels, respectively. The abbreviations are defined in Table 2.
Figure 4Average marginal effects of PM2.5 with 90% confidence intervals using the probit regression model.