Literature DB >> 33065035

Efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety of a plant-derived, quadrivalent, virus-like particle influenza vaccine in adults (18-64 years) and older adults (≥65 years): two multicentre, randomised phase 3 trials.

Brian J Ward1, Alexander Makarkov2, Annie Séguin2, Stéphane Pillet2, Sonia Trépanier2, Jiwanjeet Dhaliwall2, Michael D Libman3, Timo Vesikari4, Nathalie Landry5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Seasonal influenza remains a substantial public health threat despite the availability of egg-derived and other vaccines. Plant-based manufacturing might address some of the limitations of current vaccines. We describe two phase 3 efficacy studies of a recombinant quadrivalent virus-like particle (QVLP) influenza vaccine manufactured in plants, one in adults aged 18-64 years (the 18-64 study) and one in older people aged 65 years and older (the 65-plus study).
METHODS: We did two randomised, observer-blind, multinational studies in the northern hemisphere in the 2017-18 (the 18-64 study) and 2018-19 (the 65-plus study) influenza seasons. The 18-64 study was done at 73 sites and the 65-plus study was done at 104 sites, both across Asia, Europe, and North America. In the 18-64 study, inclusion criteria were body-mass index less than 40 kg/m2; age 18-64 years at screening visit; and good health. In the 65-plus study, inclusion criteria were body-mass index of maximum 35 kg/m2; aged 65 years or older at screening visit; not living in a rehabilitation centre or care home; and no acute or evolving medical problems. Participants in the 18-64 study were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either QVLP vaccine (30 μg haemagglutinin per strain) or placebo. Participants in the 65-plus study were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive QVLP vaccine (30 μg haemagglutinin per strain) or quadrivalent inactivated vaccine (QIV; 15 μg haemagglutinin per strain). The primary outcome in the 18-64 study was absolute vaccine efficacy to prevent laboratory-confirmed, respiratory illness caused by antigenically matched influenza strains. The primary outcome in the 65-plus study was relative vaccine efficacy to prevent laboratory-confirmed influenza-like illness caused by any influenza strain. The primary analyses were done in the per-protocol population and safety was assessed in all participants who received the assigned treatment. These studies are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (18-64 study NCT03301051; 65-plus study NCT03739112).
FINDINGS: In the 18-64 study, between Aug 30, 2017, and Jan 15, 2018, 10 160 participants were randomly assigned to receive either QVLP vaccine (5077 participants) or placebo (5083 participants). The per-protocol population consisted of 4814 participants in the QVLP group and 4812 in the placebo group. The study did not meet its primary endpoint of 70% absolute vaccine efficacy for the QVLP vaccine (35·1% [95% CI 17·9 to 48·7]) against respiratory illness caused by matched strains. 55 (1·1%) of 5064 participants in the QVLP group versus 51 (1·0%) of 5072 in the placebo group had a serious adverse event. Four (0·1%) and six [0·1%] participants had severe treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events. In the 65-plus study, between Sept 18, 2018, and Feb 22, 2019, 12 794 participants were randomly assigned to receive either QVLP vaccine (6396 participants) or QIV (6398 participants). The per-protocol population consisted of 5996 participants in the QVLP group and 6026 in the QIV group. The study met its primary non-inferiority endpoint with a relative vaccine efficacy of the QVLP vaccine for the prevention of influenza-like illness caused by any strain of 8·8% (-16·7 to 28·7). 263 (4·1%) of 6352 participants in the QVLP group versus 266 (4·2%) of 6366 in the QIV group had serious adverse events (one [<0·1%] vs two [<0·1%] were considered treatment-related); one (<0·1%) versus three (<0·1%) participants had severe treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events.
INTERPRETATION: These efficacy studies are the first large-scale studies of any plant-derived human vaccine. Together, they show that the plant-derived QVLP vaccine can provide substantial protection against respiratory illness and influenza-like illness caused by influenza viruses in adults. QVLP vaccine was well tolerated and no major safety signal arose in participants who received QVLP vaccine across the two studies. FUNDING: Medicago.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33065035     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32014-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  43 in total

1.  Regulation of Molecular Farming Products.

Authors:  Penny A C Hundleby; Marc-André D'Aoust; Carolyn Finkle; Judith Atkins; Richard M Twyman
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

2.  SARS-CoV-2 Spike Stem Protein Nanoparticles Elicited Broad ADCC and Robust Neutralization against Variants in Mice.

Authors:  Yao Ma; Ye Wang; Chunhong Dong; Gilbert X Gonzalez; Wandi Zhu; Joo Kim; Lai Wei; Sang-Moo Kang; Bao-Zhong Wang
Journal:  Small       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 15.153

Review 3.  Glyco-Engineering Plants to Produce Helminth Glycoproteins as Prospective Biopharmaceuticals: Recent Advances, Challenges and Future Prospects.

Authors:  Alex van der Kaaij; Kim van Noort; Pieter Nibbering; Ruud H P Wilbers; Arjen Schots
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 4.  Plant-Derived Human Vaccines: Recent Developments.

Authors:  Jennifer Stander; Sandiswa Mbewana; Ann E Meyers
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 7.744

5.  Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics: news.

Authors: 
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 3.452

6. 

Authors:  Markus Geisler
Journal:  Biospektrum (Heidelb)       Date:  2021-06-26

7.  Efficacy and Safety of a Recombinant Plant-Based Adjuvanted Covid-19 Vaccine.

Authors:  Karen J Hager; Gonzalo Pérez Marc; Philipe Gobeil; Ricardo S Diaz; Gretchen Heizer; Conrado Llapur; Alexander I Makarkov; Eduardo Vasconcellos; Stéphane Pillet; Fernando Riera; Pooja Saxena; Priscila Geller Wolff; Kapil Bhutada; Garry Wallace; Hessam Aazami; Christine E Jones; Fernando P Polack; Luciana Ferrara; Judith Atkins; Iohann Boulay; Jiwanjeet Dhaliwall; Nathalie Charland; Manon M J Couture; Julia Jiang-Wright; Nathalie Landry; Sophie Lapointe; Aurélien Lorin; Asif Mahmood; Lawrence H Moulton; Emmy Pahmer; Julie Parent; Annie Séguin; Luan Tran; Thomas Breuer; Maria-Angeles Ceregido; Marguerite Koutsoukos; François Roman; Junya Namba; Marc-André D'Aoust; Sonia Trepanier; Yosuke Kimura; Brian J Ward
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 176.079

Review 8.  Delivery Routes for COVID-19 Vaccines.

Authors:  Jang Hyun Park; Heung Kyu Lee
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-19

9.  Is it possible to ensure COVID19 vaccine supply by using plants?

Authors:  Anirban Bhar
Journal:  Nucleus (Calcutta)       Date:  2021-07-02

10.  Antibodies induced by oral immunization of mice with a recombinant protein produced in tobacco plants harboring Bordetella pertussis epitopes.

Authors:  Karla Sanchez-Alvarez; Sergio Rosales-Mendoza; Karen L Reyes-Barrera; Leticia Moreno-Fierros; Ruth E Soria-Guerra; Rosalba Castillo-Collazo; Elizabeth Monreal-Escalente; Angel G Alpuche-Solis
Journal:  Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 2.711

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.