Literature DB >> 33064891

Perspective: Increasing blue carbon around Antarctica is an ecosystem service of considerable societal and economic value worth protecting.

Narissa Bax1, Chester J Sands2, Brendan Gogarty3, Rachel V Downey4, Camille V E Moreau5, Bernabé Moreno6, Christoph Held7, Maria L Paulsen8, Jeffrey McGee3, Marcus Haward1, David K A Barnes2.   

Abstract

Precautionary conservation and cooperative global governance are needed to protect Antarctic blue carbon: the world's largest increasing natural form of carbon storage with high sequestration potential. As patterns of ice loss around Antarctica become more uniform, there is an underlying increase in carbon capture-to-storage-to-sequestration on the seafloor. The amount of carbon captured per unit area is increasing and the area available to blue carbon is also increasing. Carbon sequestration could further increase under moderate (+1°C) ocean warming, contrary to decreasing global blue carbon stocks elsewhere. For example, in warmer waters, mangroves and seagrasses are in decline and benthic organisms are close to their physiological limits, so a 1°C increase in water temperature could push them above their thermal tolerance (e.g. bleaching of coral reefs). In contrast, on the basis of past change and current research, we expect that Antarctic blue carbon could increase by orders of magnitude. The Antarctic seafloor is biophysically unique and the site of carbon sequestration, the benthos, faces less anthropogenic disturbance than any other ocean continental shelf environment. This isolation imparts both vulnerability to change, and an avenue to conserve one of the world's last biodiversity refuges. In economic terms, the value of Antarctic blue carbon is estimated at between £0.65 and £1.76 billion (~2.27 billion USD) for sequestered carbon in the benthos around the continental shelf. To balance biodiversity protection against society's economic objectives, this paper builds on a proposal incentivising protection by building a 'non-market framework' via the 2015 Paris Agreement to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. This could be connected and coordinated through the Antarctic Treaty System to promote and motivate member states to value Antarctic blue carbon and maintain scientific integrity and conservation for the positive societal values ingrained in the Antarctic Treaty System.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antarctic Treaty System; biodiversity conservation; blue carbon; carbon sequestration

Year:  2020        PMID: 33064891     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.15392

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  6 in total

1.  Deep aspirations: towards a sustainable offshore Blue Economy.

Authors:  Camilla Novaglio; Narissa Bax; Fabio Boschetti; Gholam Reza Emad; Stewart Frusher; Liam Fullbrook; Mark Hemer; Sarah Jennings; Ingrid van Putten; Lucy M Robinson; Erica Spain; Joanna Vince; Michelle Voyer; Graham Wood; Elizabeth A Fulton
Journal:  Rev Fish Biol Fish       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 6.845

2.  Ocean resource use: building the coastal blue economy.

Authors:  Narissa Bax; Camilla Novaglio; Kimberley H Maxwell; Koen Meyers; Joy McCann; Sarah Jennings; Stewart Frusher; Elizabeth A Fulton; Melissa Nursey-Bray; Mibu Fischer; Kelli Anderson; Cayne Layton; Gholam Reza Emad; Karen A Alexander; Yannick Rousseau; Zau Lunn; Chris G Carter
Journal:  Rev Fish Biol Fish       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 6.845

Review 3.  Societal importance of Antarctic negative feedbacks on climate change: blue carbon gains from sea ice, ice shelf and glacier losses.

Authors:  D K A Barnes; C J Sands; M L Paulsen; B Moreno; C Moreau; C Held; R Downey; N Bax; J S Stark; N Zwerschke
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2021-09-07

Review 4.  Actions to halt biodiversity loss generally benefit the climate.

Authors:  Yunne-Jai Shin; Guy F Midgley; Emma R M Archer; Almut Arneth; David K A Barnes; Lena Chan; Shizuka Hashimoto; Ove Hoegh-Guldberg; Gregory Insarov; Paul Leadley; Lisa A Levin; Hien T Ngo; Ram Pandit; Aliny P F Pires; Hans-Otto Pörtner; Alex D Rogers; Robert J Scholes; Josef Settele; Pete Smith
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2022-02-27       Impact factor: 13.211

5.  Commercial fishery disturbance of the global ocean biological carbon sink.

Authors:  Emma L Cavan; Simeon L Hill
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2021-12-18       Impact factor: 13.211

6.  Climate Mitigation through Biological Conservation: Extensive and Valuable Blue Carbon Natural Capital in Tristan da Cunha's Giant Marine Protected Zone.

Authors:  David K A Barnes; James B Bell; Amelia E Bridges; Louise Ireland; Kerry L Howell; Stephanie M Martin; Chester J Sands; Alejandra Mora Soto; Terri Souster; Gareth Flint; Simon A Morley
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.