Literature DB >> 33064850

Analgesia for vaginal birth: Secondary analysis from the WHO Multicountry Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health.

Marcio A Souza1, Jose G Cecatti1, Jose P Guida1, Joao P Souza2, Ahmet M Gulmezoglu3, Ana P Betran3, Maria R Torloni4, Joshua P Vogel3,5, Maria L Costa1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of analgesia during labor in women who had a vaginal birth and to determine the factors associated with its use.
METHODS: A secondary analysis was performed of the WHO Multicountry Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health, a cross-sectional, facility-based survey including 359 healthcare facilities in 29 countries. The prevalence of analgesia use for vaginal birth in different countries was reported according to the Human Development Index (HDI). Sociodemographic and obstetric characteristics of the participants with and without analgesia were compared. The prevalence ratios were compared across countries, HDI groups, and regions using a design-based χ2 test.
RESULTS: Among the 221 345 women who had a vaginal birth, only 4% received labor analgesia, mainly epidural. The prevalence of women receiving analgesia was significantly higher in countries with a higher HDI than in countries with a lower HDI. Education was significantly associated with increased use of analgesia; nulliparous women and women undergoing previous cesarean delivery had a significantly increased likelihood of receiving analgesia.
CONCLUSION: Use of analgesia for women undergoing labor and vaginal delivery was low, specifically in low-HDI countries. Whether low use of analgesia reflects women's desire or an unmet need for pain relief requires further studies.
© 2020 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analgesia; Birth; Epidural; Labor; Maternal health; Vaginal birth

Year:  2020        PMID: 33064850     DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.13424

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   3.561


  3 in total

1.  Labor epidural analgesia versus without labor epidural analgesia for multiparous women: a retrospective case control study.

Authors:  Shuzhi Luo; Zhaowen Chen; Xujian Wang; Changyu Zhu; Shili Su
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 2.217

2.  Intrapartum Analgesia-Have Women's Preferences Changed over the Last Decade?

Authors:  Agnieszka Jodzis; Maciej Walędziak; Krzysztof Czajkowski; Anna Różańska-Walędziak
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 2.430

Review 3.  Update on Non-neuraxial Labor Analgesia.

Authors:  Dana Karol; Carolyn F Weiniger
Journal:  Curr Anesthesiol Rep       Date:  2021-08-18
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.