Christopher Napier 1,2 , Megan Ryan BSc 3 , Carlo Menon 1 , Max R Paquette 3 Show Affiliations »
Abstract
CONTEXT: Historically, methods of monitoring training loads in runners have used simple and convenient metrics, including the duration or distance run. Changes in these values are assessed on a week-to-week basis to induce training adaptations and manage injury risk. To date, whether different measures of external loads, including biomechanical measures, provide better information regarding week-to-week changes in external loads experienced by a runner is unclear. In addition, the importance of combining internal-load measures, such as session rating of perceived exertion (sRPE), with different external-load measures to monitor week-to-week changes in training load in runners is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To compare week-to-week changes in the training loads of recreational runners using different quantification methods. DESIGN: Case series. SETTING: Community based. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Recreational runners in Vancouver, British Columbia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Week-to-week changes in running time, steps, and cumulative shock, in addition to the product of each of these variables and the corresponding sRPE scores for each run. RESULTS: Sixty-eight participants were included in the final analysis. Differences were present in week-to-week changes for running time compared with timeRPE (d = 0.24), stepsRPE (d = 0.24), and shockRPE (d = 0.31). The differences between week-to-week changes in running time and cumulative shock were also significant at the overall group level (d = 0.10). CONCLUSIONS: We found that the use of an internal training-load measure (sRPE) in combination with external load (training duration) provided a more individualized estimate of week-to-week changes in overall training stress. A better estimation of training stress has significant implications for monitoring training adaptations, resulting performance, and possibly injury risk reduction. We therefore recommend the regular use of sRPE and training duration to monitor training load in runners. The use of cumulative shock as a measure of external load in some runners may also be more valid than duration alone. © by the National Athletic Trainers' Association, Inc.
CONTEXT: Historically, methods of monitoring training loads in runners have used simple and convenient metrics, including the duration or distance run. Changes in these values are assessed on a week-to-week basis to induce training adaptations and manage injury risk. To date, whether different measures of external loads, including biomechanical measures, provide better information regarding week-to-week changes in external loads experienced by a runner is unclear. In addition, the importance of combining internal-load measures, such as session rating of perceived exertion (sRPE), with different external-load measures to monitor week-to-week changes in training load in runners is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To compare week-to-week changes in the training loads of recreational runners using different quantification methods. DESIGN: Case series. SETTING: Community based. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS : Recreational runners in Vancouver, British Columbia . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Week-to-week changes in running time, steps, and cumulative shock, in addition to the product of each of these variables and the corresponding sRPE scores for each run. RESULTS: Sixty-eight participants were included in the final analysis. Differences were present in week-to-week changes for running time compared with timeRPE (d = 0.24), stepsRPE (d = 0.24), and shockRPE (d = 0.31). The differences between week-to-week changes in running time and cumulative shock were also significant at the overall group level (d = 0.10). CONCLUSIONS: We found that the use of an internal training-load measure (sRPE) in combination with external load (training duration) provided a more individualized estimate of week-to-week changes in overall training stress . A better estimation of training stress has significant implications for monitoring training adaptations, resulting performance, and possibly injury risk reduction. We therefore recommend the regular use of sRPE and training duration to monitor training load in runners. The use of cumulative shock as a measure of external load in some runners may also be more valid than duration alone. © by the National Athletic Trainers' Association, Inc.
Entities: Disease
Species
Keywords:
inertial sensors; monitoring; running; training load; training response
Mesh： See more »
Year: 2020
PMID： 33064812 PMCID： PMC7740055 DOI： 10.4085/1062-6050-573-19
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Athl Train ISSN： 1062-6050 Impact factor: 2.860