OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to determine the state of anxiety, depression, and stress present in the society during the development of the 2019 coronavirus pandemic. METHODS: Mixed methods study; a three-section questionnaire was developed which included sociodemographic, perceptions, emotions, and behaviors related to the 2019 coronavirus pandemic, and two emotional assessment psychometric tests. The proportions and confidence intervals of the variables were calculated and compared using the Chi-square test. RESULTS: More than 40% of the subjects presented some degree of anxiety and 41.3% depression; the proportion of stress was < 30%. Of the subjects who experienced anxiety, 18.6% also had moderate-to-very severe depression or stress. CONCLUSION: There are emotional indicators derived from the 2019 coronavirus pandemic in almost half of the study population. The identification and timely treatment of these states could lessen the psychological impact due to 2019 coronavirus. Copyright:
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to determine the state of anxiety, depression, and stress present in the society during the development of the 2019 coronavirus pandemic. METHODS: Mixed methods study; a three-section questionnaire was developed which included sociodemographic, perceptions, emotions, and behaviors related to the 2019 coronavirus pandemic, and two emotional assessment psychometric tests. The proportions and confidence intervals of the variables were calculated and compared using the Chi-square test. RESULTS: More than 40% of the subjects presented some degree of anxiety and 41.3% depression; the proportion of stress was < 30%. Of the subjects who experienced anxiety, 18.6% also had moderate-to-very severe depression or stress. CONCLUSION: There are emotional indicators derived from the 2019 coronavirus pandemic in almost half of the study population. The identification and timely treatment of these states could lessen the psychological impact due to 2019 coronavirus. Copyright:
Authors: Yazmín Hernández-Díaz; Alma Delia Genis-Mendoza; Miguel Ángel Ramos-Méndez; Isela Esther Juárez-Rojop; Carlos Alfonso Tovilla-Zárate; Thelma Beatriz González-Castro; María Lilia López-Narváez; Humberto Nicolini Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-06-06 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Elena de Jesús Quispe Sáenz; José Fernando Salvador-Carrillo; Oriana Rivera-Lozada; Cesar Antonio Bonilla Asalde Journal: F1000Res Date: 2021-09-22
Authors: Agnieszka Markiewicz-Gospodarek; Aleksandra Górska; Renata Markiewicz; Zuzanna Chilimoniuk; Marcin Czeczelewski; Jacek Baj; Ryszard Maciejewski; Jolanta Masiak Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-08-04 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Angel Josabad Alonso-Castro; Alan Joel Ruiz-Padilla; Miriam Ortiz-Cortes; Eleazar Carranza; Marco Antonio Ramírez-Morales; Raymundo Escutia-Gutiérrez; Yeniley Ruiz-Noa; Juan Ramon Zapata-Morales Journal: J Ethnopharmacol Date: 2021-02-18 Impact factor: 5.195