Evangelos Giotakis1, Valentinos Sofokleous2, Alexander Delides3, Andriana Razou1, Georgios Pallis1, Alexandra Karakasi1, Pavlos Maragoudakis3. 1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, General Hospital of Athens "Hippokration", National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece. 2. Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, General Hospital of Athens "Hippokration", National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece. valsof@med.uoa.gr. 3. Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, "Attikon" University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Paranasal sinus osteomas are slow-growing, benign bony tumours that when larger than 30 mm, they are termed 'gigantic'. Special considerations apply for tumours of this calibre, and their rarity renders their management fairly controversial. This study seeks to contribute to an increased understanding concerning their management by presenting a 12-year experience from a single institution. METHODS: Retrospective review of files of patients treated for a gigantic paranasal sinus osteoma from January 2008 to December 2019. Additionally, all patients were prospectively reexamined in early 2020 for late complications or clinical recurrence. RESULTS: Ten patients were included, with a mean age of 53.8 years (range: 23-77 years). The leading presenting findings were proptosis (80%) and diplopia (70%). Transient visual impairment was remarkably frequent (30%). Five patients were managed with an open approach, two with an endoscopic, and three with a combined technique. The most common adverse characteristics that dictated the use of an open approach, alone or in combination with an endoscopic approach, were the involvement of the anterior wall of the frontal sinus (40%), erosion of its posterior wall (30%), and a far-anterior intraorbital extension (30%). No major postoperative complications were observed, and also no recurrences. CONCLUSION: Our study illustrates that these tumours may require a different management attitude. Despite substantial advances in the endoscopic management of benign sinonasal tumours, managing these massive tumours solely endoscopically could, in many cases, be inefficacious or impossible. Open approaches remain valuable, representing a safe and straightforward method for adequate exposure.
PURPOSE:Paranasal sinus osteomas are slow-growing, benign bony tumours that when larger than 30 mm, they are termed 'gigantic'. Special considerations apply for tumours of this calibre, and their rarity renders their management fairly controversial. This study seeks to contribute to an increased understanding concerning their management by presenting a 12-year experience from a single institution. METHODS: Retrospective review of files of patients treated for a gigantic paranasal sinus osteoma from January 2008 to December 2019. Additionally, all patients were prospectively reexamined in early 2020 for late complications or clinical recurrence. RESULTS: Ten patients were included, with a mean age of 53.8 years (range: 23-77 years). The leading presenting findings were proptosis (80%) and diplopia (70%). Transient visual impairment was remarkably frequent (30%). Five patients were managed with an open approach, two with an endoscopic, and three with a combined technique. The most common adverse characteristics that dictated the use of an open approach, alone or in combination with an endoscopic approach, were the involvement of the anterior wall of the frontal sinus (40%), erosion of its posterior wall (30%), and a far-anterior intraorbital extension (30%). No major postoperative complications were observed, and also no recurrences. CONCLUSION: Our study illustrates that these tumours may require a different management attitude. Despite substantial advances in the endoscopic management of benign sinonasal tumours, managing these massive tumours solely endoscopically could, in many cases, be inefficacious or impossible. Open approaches remain valuable, representing a safe and straightforward method for adequate exposure.
Authors: Valerie J Lund; Heinz Stammberger; Piero Nicolai; Paolo Castelnuovo; Tim Beal; Alfred Beham; Manuel Bernal-Sprekelsen; Hannes Braun; Paola Cappabianca; Ricardo Carrau; Luigi Cavallo; George Clarici; Wolfwang Draf; Felice Esposito; Juan Fernandez-Miranda; Wytske Fokkens; Paul Gardner; Verena Gellner; Henrik Hellquist; Phillipe Hermann; Werner Hosemann; David Howard; Nick Jones; Mark Jorissen; Amin Kassam; Daniel Kelly; Senta Kurschel-Lackner; Samuel Leong; Nancy McLaughlin; Roberto Maroldi; Amir Minovi; Michael Mokry; Metin Onerci; Yew Kwang Ong; Daniel Prevedello; Hesham Saleh; Dharambir S Sehti; Daniel Simmen; Carl Snyderman; Auturo Solares; Magaret Spittle; Aldo Stamm; Peter Tomazic; Matteo Trimarchi; Frank Unger; Peter-John Wormald; Adam Zanation Journal: Rhinol Suppl Date: 2010-06-01
Authors: Sarmad Aburas; Benedikt Schneider; Florian Pfaffeneder-Mantai; Oliver Meller; Arne Balensiefer; Dritan Turhani Journal: Ann Med Surg (Lond) Date: 2022-05-18