Literature DB >> 33063793

Evaluation of swabs from 15 commercially available oral fluid sample collection devices for the analysis of commonly abused substances: doping agents and drugs of abuse.

Łukasz Sobczak1, Krzysztof Goryński.   

Abstract

Oral fluid testing is steadily building its position as a valuable complement or alternative to plasma and urine analyses in everyday laboratory practice. However, the great significance of the sample collection process in the attainment of representative results is not always paralleled by the attention given to its informed selection. Few evaluations of commercially available sample collection devices have been published until now, and the current work intends to fill this gap by presenting an evaluation of swabs from 15 different devices for the analysis of 49 popular drugs. Swabs, derived from sample collection devices, were used to collect a drug-fortified mixture. Then, swab-retrieved samples were subjected to instrumental analysis with the high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry method. Results within the 80-120% range were considered to have no significant impact on analyte concentration (thus satisfactory) and were observed in 44.1% of all results. Out of the 15 evaluated swabs, 7 provided results in the aforementioned range for more than half of the substances under study. The possibility of matrix effects originating from swab materials was also investigated. The selection of an appropriate oral fluid sample collection method plays a critical role in the success of the analytical procedure, a fact that is well-illustrated by the tremendous differences between analyte concentrations observed in this research. Perhaps, the tedious labour of improving sample preparation and analysis methods already in-use could be spared if only greater emphasis were to be put on the improvement and better selection of suitable solutions for oral fluid collection.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33063793     DOI: 10.1039/d0an01379j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Analyst        ISSN: 0003-2654            Impact factor:   4.616


  7 in total

1.  Quantitative and rapid detection of morphine and hydromorphone at the point of care by an automated giant magnetoresistive nanosensor platform.

Authors:  Dana L Cortade; Shan X Wang
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 4.478

2.  Polydopamine coated hypodermic needles as a microextraction device for the determination of tricyclic antidepressants in oral fluid by direct infusion MS/MS.

Authors:  Carmina Vejar-Vivar; María Teresa García-Valverde; Claudia Mardones; Rafael Lucena; Soledad Cárdenas
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 3.361

3.  Modifying current thin-film microextraction (TFME) solutions for analyzing prohibited substances: Evaluating new coatings using liquid chromatography.

Authors:  Łukasz Sobczak; Dominika Kołodziej; Krzysztof Goryński
Journal:  J Pharm Anal       Date:  2022-01-04

4.  Saliva as Blood Alternative in Therapeutic Monitoring of Teriflunomide-Development and Validation of the Novel Analytical Method.

Authors:  Bartłomiej Sankowski; Sylwia Michorowska; Emilia Raćkowska; Mariusz Sikora; Joanna Giebułtowicz
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 6.208

5.  Pre-cleaned bare wooden toothpicks for the determination of drugs in oral fluid by mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Jaime Millán-Santiago; Rafael Lucena; Soledad Cárdenas
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 4.478

6.  Polyamide Noncoated Device for Adsorption-Based Microextraction and Novel 3D Printed Thin-Film Microextraction Supports.

Authors:  Dominika Kołodziej; Łukasz Sobczak; Krzysztof Goryński
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 6.986

7.  Development of robust isothermal RNA amplification assay for lab-free testing of RNA viruses.

Authors:  Radhika Biyani; Kirti Sharma; Kenji Kojima; Madhu Biyani; Vishnu Sharma; Tarun Kumawat; Kevin Maafu Juma; Itaru Yanagihara; Shinsuke Fujiwara; Eiichi Kodama; Yuzuru Takamura; Masahiro Takagi; Kiyoshi Yasukawa; Manish Biyani
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.