Literature DB >> 33062965

Breast Cancer Screening Trends among Lower Income Women of New York: A Time-Series Evaluation of a Population-Based Intervention.

Shizhen He1,2, Stephen W Pan1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the screening rate trends of mammography among New York State's lower-income women and the higher-income women from 1988 to 2010, and evaluate the potential influence of New York State's Breast Cancer Early Detection Program (introduced in 1994) on the mammography use rates of lower-income women.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Lower-income women are defined as women aged 40 and over whose household income is lower than 250% of the single member household federal poverty level (FPL) in the year that they participated in the survey. Higher-income women are defined as women aged 40 and over whose income is greater than 250% of the five-person household FPL. Data were obtained from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Interrupted time series analysis was conducted to examine screening rates before and after the launch of the Breast Cancer Early Detection program.
RESULTS: Among the lower-income women, the pre-intervention mammography screening rate significantly increased by an average of 15.21% every two years. However, after implementation of the Breast Cancer Early Detection Program, this rate of increase significantly slowed (slope change=-13.67, p=0.00016). The lower-income women and the higher-income women experienced a similar trend change after the intervention started.
CONCLUSION: This study found limited evidence that the Breast Cancer Early Detection Programme significantly contributed to the state-wide increase in mammography screening rate among lower-income women from 1988 to 2010. Future studies should examine the influence of structural and individual barriers inhibiting uptake of mammography screening among lower-income women.
Copyright © 2020 Turkish Federation of Breast Diseases Associations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health disparities; United States; segmented regression; socioeconomic

Year:  2020        PMID: 33062965      PMCID: PMC7535991          DOI: 10.5152/ejbh.2020.5802

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Breast Health


  20 in total

1.  Public health surveillance for behavioral risk factors in a changing environment. Recommendations from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Team.

Authors:  Ali H Mokdad; Donna F Stroup; Wayne H Giles
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2003-05-23

2.  Breast cancer screening and socioeconomic status--35 metropolitan areas, 2000 and 2002.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2005-10-07       Impact factor: 17.586

3.  Judging nudging: can nudging improve population health?

Authors:  Theresa M Marteau; David Ogilvie; Martin Roland; Marc Suhrcke; Michael P Kelly
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-01-25

Review 4.  Effectiveness of Breast Cancer Screening: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis to Update the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation.

Authors:  Heidi D Nelson; Rochelle Fu; Amy Cantor; Miranda Pappas; Monica Daeges; Linda Humphrey
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  General practitioner referrals to one-stop clinics for symptoms that could be indicative of cancer: a systematic review of use and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Claire Friedemann Smith; Alice Tompson; Gea A Holtman; Clare Bankhead; Fergus Gleeson; Daniel Lasserson; Brian D Nicholson
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 2.267

6.  Use of health care services by lower-income and higher-income uninsured adults.

Authors:  Joseph S Ross; Elizabeth H Bradley; Susan H Busch
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-05-03       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Socioeconomic disparities in preventive care persist despite universal coverage. Breast and cervical cancer screening in Ontario and the United States.

Authors:  S J Katz; T P Hofer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-08-17       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  Screening for breast cancer with mammography.

Authors:  Peter C Gøtzsche; Karsten Juhl Jørgensen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-06-04

9.  Tracking chronic disease and risk behavior prevalence as survey participation declines: statistics from the behavioral risk factor surveillance system and other national surveys.

Authors:  Mansour Fahimi; Michael Link; Ali Mokdad; Deborah A Schwartz; Paul Levy
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2008-06-15       Impact factor: 2.830

10.  Meta-analysis of breast cancer mortality benefit and overdiagnosis adjusted for adherence: improving information on the effects of attending screening mammography.

Authors:  Gemma Jacklyn; Paul Glasziou; Petra Macaskill; Alexandra Barratt
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.