| Literature DB >> 33062441 |
Honghui Zhang1,2,3, Zhendong Zhong1,2,4, Gaoyin Kong5, Junaid Khan1,2,3, Lianhong Zou6, Yu Jiang6, Xiehong Liu6, Yixun Tang5, Bo Jiang1,2,3, Chuang Peng1,2,3, Yinghui Song1,2,3, Sulai Liu1,2,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the bile duct (IPMN-B) is considered an uncommon tumor, and there is limited understanding of IPMN-B. This study aimed to investigate the prognosis and influential factors of the IPMN-B from 58 cases.Entities:
Keywords: Papillary mucinous tumor in the bile duct; Prognosis; Radical resection; Risk factor
Year: 2020 PMID: 33062441 PMCID: PMC7532777 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.10040
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Clinicopathological parameters of 58 IPNM-B patients.
| Clinical Features | Benign | Malignant | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | % | N | % | ||||
| Age (years) | 0.017 | 0.897 | |||||
| ≤60 | 15 | 44.12 | 19 | 55.88 | |||
| >60 | 11 | 45.83 | 13 | 54.17 | |||
| Gender | 0.500 | 0.479 | |||||
| Female | 17 | 48.57 | 18 | 51.43 | |||
| Male | 9 | 39.13 | 14 | 60.87 | |||
| Stones | 0.012 | 0.913 | |||||
| Negative | 6 | 46.15 | 7 | 53.85 | |||
| Positive | 20 | 44.44 | 25 | 55.56 | |||
| Previous biliary surgery | 0.139 | 0.710 | |||||
| Negative | 11 | 47.83 | 12 | 52.17 | |||
| Positive | 15 | 42.86 | 20 | 57.14 | |||
| Jaundice | 0.330 | 0.566 | |||||
| Negative | 10 | 50.00 | 10 | 50.00 | |||
| Positive | 16 | 42.11 | 22 | 57.89 | |||
| CA19-9 | 0.051 | 0.821 | |||||
| Normal | 13 | 44.83 | 16 | 55.17 | |||
| High | 13 | 41.94 | 18 | 58.06 | |||
| CA242 | 7.083 | 0.008 | |||||
| Normal | 21 | 56.76 | 16 | 43.24 | |||
| High | 5 | 21.74 | 18 | 78.26 | |||
| CEA | 8.148 | 0.004 | |||||
| Normal | 25 | 54.35 | 21 | 46.65 | |||
| High | 1 | 8.33 | 11 | 91.67 | |||
| Surgical method | 0.808 | 0.369 | |||||
| radical resection | 22 | 47.83 | 24 | 52.17 | |||
| palliative resection | 4 | 33.33 | 8 | 66.67 | |||
Notes.
χ2 test was used to compare the distribution of clinical features between benign IPNM-B patients and malignant IPNM-B patients.
CA19-9 normal reference range: 0–35 U/ mL.
CA242 normal reference range: 0–20 U/mL.
CEA normal reference range: 0–5 ng/ mL.
A P value <0.05 was considered significant.
Figure 1ROC curve of CA242 and CEA.
Figure 2Imaging of IPNM-B: (A) Typical CT manifestations showed obvious cystic dilatation of the intrahepatic bile duct, a small spot-shaped high-density lesion in the bile duct of the right hepatic lobe. (B) T2 magnetic resonance imaging showed a clear soft vine-like expansion of the intrahepatic bile duct, and a small nodular T2 signal foci in the bile duct. (C) The duodenoscopy showed a common bile duct duodenal fistula by below the duodenum above the duodenal papilla, about 1.0 cm in diameter, full filled with full of jelly-like Slime.
Figure 3The cumulative survival of patients with benign IPNM-B patients and malignant IPNM-B patients was determined by the Kaplan–Meier method.
Multivariate analysis of factors contributing to overall survival in 29 malignant IPNM-B patients.
| Variables | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | |||
| Age (<60 vs. ≥60) | 0.114 (0.002–6.305) | 0.413 | – | – |
| Gender (female vs. male) | 0.166 (0.012–2.216) | 0.838 | – | – |
| Stones | 2.007 (0.166–12.283) | 0.540 | – | – |
| Jaundice | 3.890 (0.138–25.550) | 0.074 | – | – |
| CA19-9 | 0.835 (0.061–11.335) | 0.099 | – | – |
| CA242 | 0.326 (0.063–1.678) | 0.116 | – | – |
| CEA | 1.143 (0.086–9.181) | 0.097 | – | – |
| Lymph node metastasis | 0.368 (0.054–2.519) | 0.015 | 0.442 (0.111–1.755) | 0.246 |
| Surgical method | 5.444 (0.337–27.848) | 0.018 | 0.081 (0.010–0.673) | 0.665 |
| Differentiation degree | 0.056 (0.007–0.451) | 0.000 | 0.06 (0.007–0.486) | 0.008 |
Notes.
Univariate and multivariate analysis of prognostic factors in 29 malignant IPNM-B patients included in the survival analysis.
Statistical analyses were performed by Cox proportional hazards regression. A P value <0.05 was considered significant. Italic indicates significant P values.
CI, confidence interval.