Plasma Fibrinogen Predicts the Prognosis of Bladder Cancer Patients After Radical Cystectomy.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the potential utility of plasma fibrinogen as a prognostic factor in patients with bladder cancer (BCa) after radical cystectomy (RC).
METHODS: Patients with BCa who underwent RC from 2014 to 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. The indexes of plasma coagulation and fibrinolysis system factors were collected. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to calculate the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). The prognostic value of plasma fibrinogen was analyzed by using Cox regression model, and a nomogram of BCa based on plasma fibrinogen was generated by R software.
RESULTS: Among 145 patients, the optimal cut-off value of plasma fibrinogen was 3.14g/L. High level of plasma fibrinogen was related to the poor prognosis of patients with BCa, and plasma fibrinogen has a more accurate prognostic ability than other plasma coagulation and fibrinolysis system factors. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that plasma fibrinogen was an independent predictor of OS (>3.14 vs ≤3.14 HR, 2.58, 95% CI = 1.28-5.23; p = 0.008) and DFS (>3.14 vs ≤3.14 HR, 2.60, 95% CI = 1.20-5.65; p = 0.016), and the nomogram based on plasma fibrinogen had better accuracy and discrimination (area under the curve (AUC): OS = 0.741, DFS = 0.733).
CONCLUSION: Plasma fibrinogen can be used as an independent predictor of OS and DFS for RC patients, and the nomogram based on plasma fibrinogen was a reliable model for predicting the prognosis after RC.

Introduction

Bladder cancer (BCa) is a common malignant tumor in the urinary system. There are an estimated 81,400 new cases and 17,980 deaths in the United States in 2020.1 Muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) accounts for approximately 20–25% of BCa, and is prone to metastasis and progression.2 Radical cystectomy (RC) is currently the most effective treatment for MIBC, which can maximize the survival time of patients.3 However, the 5-year tumor-specific survival rate of MIBC patients is only about 50%.4

The identification and discovery of tumor biomarkers are related to the risk assessment, treatment plan and prognosis of patients with BCa. Several biomarkers and biomarker combinations, such as C-reactive protein and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), have been reported as independent prognostic value in patients with BCa, but their value was still controversial.5–7 More and more evidence shown that there is a correlation between the activation of coagulation and fibrinolysis system and tumor angiogenesis, progression and metastasis.8,9 Many studies have reported that various factors of coagulation and fibrinolysis system, such as plasma fibrinogen and D-dimer, were abnormally expressed in cancer patients, and fibrinogen and D-dimer can be used as prognostic indicators of various malignant tumors.10–12

Previous studies have noted that preoperative plasma fibrinogen levels can be used to predict the degree of invasion and pathological stage of BCa.13 In addition, preoperative plasma fibrinogen and D-dimer levels can be used as predictors of recurrence and progression in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC).14 The purpose of this study was to determine the correlation between coagulation and fibrinolysis system factors and their combinations and postoperative prognosis in patients with RC.

Patients and Methods

Patients Population

A retrospective analysis of BCa patients who received RC in the Department of Urology of The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College from January 2014 to December 2019. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, and all patients or their families have understood the purpose of the study and signed an informed consent form. The inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) histopathologic diagnosis of BCa after transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT), including MIBC and high-grade T1 BCa; 2) age over 18 years. We excluded patients with other malignant tumors, preoperative chemotherapy or radiotherapy, unknown coagulation factors, and loss of follow-up data. Finally, 145 patients participated in the study.

Data Collection and Follow-Up

Patients’ blood samples were collected within one week before surgery. Retrospective demographic information was collected from the patient’s electronic medical records, including age (≤65 and >65), gender (male and female), diabetes (yes and no), hypertension (yes and no), cardiovascular diseases (yes and no), T stage (T1–2 and T3–4), N stage (N0 and N+), M stage (M0 and M1) and tumor size. TNM staging was assessed postoperatively using the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System (seventh Edition, 2010). Laboratory data such as platelet, D-dimer, fibrinogen, neutrophils, lymphocytes and albumin were collected. The definitions of PLR, PDM, NLFgA and NLDA are as follows: PLR = platelet-lymphocyte ratio, PDM = platelet × D-dimer, NLFgA = neutrophil × fibrinogen/(lymphocyte × albumin), NLDA = neutrophil × D-dimer/(lymphocyte × albumin). The upper limit of normal (ULN) for platelets in our hospital is 350 × 109/L. In this study, all patients were followed up after operation, and the survival status of patients was collected during each follow-up. The overall survival time (OS) is the time from the completion of the operation to the date of death, regardless of the cause of death. Disease-free survival (DFS) refers to the time for patients to survive without any signs or symptoms of cancer after operation.

Statistical Analysis

Continuous variables were represented by mean ± standard deviation (SD), and classified variables were expressed by numbers and percentages. Pearson’s χ 2 test or Fisher exact test were used to test the differences of classified variables. X-tile software (version 3.6.1) was used to obtain the optimal cutoff values for tumor size, fibrinogen, PLR, PDM, NLFgA and NLDA. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the correlation between different coagulation factors for OS and DFS, and p-values were corrected with the Bonferroni correction. The OS and DFS survival curves were drawn by Kaplan–Meier method and evaluated by Log rank test. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to examine the potential risk factors associated with OS and DFS, and the corresponding hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. Based on the results of multivariate logistic regression, the R software was used to construct the nomogram, and the ROC curve and decision curve analysis (DCA) curve were used to evaluate the prediction performance of the nomogram. All statistical analyses were performed using MedCalc software (version 15.2.0) and R software (version 3.5.3). P-value <0.05 was considered to be statistically.

Results

Baseline Demographic and Clinicopathological Characteristics

The optimal cutoff values for tumor size, fibrinogen, PLR, PDM, NLFgA and NLDA were 4.7cm, 3.14g/L, 154.62, 244.86, 0.22 and 0.06, respectively (Figure 1). Table 1 lists the demographic and clinicopathological characteristics of all patients. The majority of patients were male (86.2%), N0 stage (78.6%), M0 stage (95.2%), platelet ≤ULN (87.6%), without diabetes (85.5%), hypertension (64.1%) and cardiovascular disease (87.6%). In the entire cohort, the mean age of the patients was 65.92 ± 10.16 years, tumor size was 3.84 ± 2.36 cm, fibrinogen was 2.99 ± 0.86g/L, PLR was 165.35 ± 83.80, PDM was 186.03 ± 225.10, NLFgA was 0.32 ± 0.36, and NLDA was 0.09 ± 0.15.

Figure 1

X-tile software was used to obtain the optimal cutoff values for tumor size, fibrinogen, PLR, PDM, NLFgA and NLDA. (A) Tumor size; (B) Fibrinogen; (C) Platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR); (D) Platelet × D-dimer (PDM); (E) Neutrophil × Fibrinogen/(lymphocyte × albumin) (NLFgA); (F) Neutrophil × D-dimer/(lymphocyte × albumin) (NLDA).

Table 1

Baseline Characteristics of the Study Population

Characteristics	All Patients
	No. (%)
Total patients	145
Age, y, mean (SD)	65.92±10.16
Age categorized, y
≤65	73 (50.3)
>65	72 (49.7)
Gender
Male	125 (86.2)
Female	20 (13.8)
Diabetes
Yes	21 (14.5)
No	124 (85.5)
Hypertension
Yes	52 (35.9)
No	93 (64.1)
Cardiovascular diseases
Yes	18 (12.4)
No	127 (87.6)
T-stage
T1–2	80 (55.2)
T3–4	65 (44.8)
N-stage
N0	114 (78.6)
N+	31 (21.4)
M-stage
M0	138 (95.2)
M1	7 (4.8)
Tumor size, cm	3.84±2.36
Platelet, 10^9/L
≤ULN	127 (87.6)
>ULN	18 (12.4)
D-dimer, mg/L
≤0.55	86 (59.3)
>0.55	59 (40.7)
Fibrinogen, g/L	2.99±0.86
PLR	165.35±83.80
PDM	186.03±225.10
NLFgA	0.32±0.36
NLDA	0.09±0.15

Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; ULN, upper limit of normal; PLR, platelet-lymphocyte ratio; PDM, platelet × D-dimer; NLFgA, neutrophil × fibrinogen/(lymphocyte × albumin); NLDA, neutrophil × D-dimer/(lymphocyte × albumin).

We evaluated the sensitivity of seven coagulation-related indexes to the prognosis of BCa by ROC curve, and we found that the area under the curve (AUC) of fibrinogen was higher than platelet, D-dimer, PLR, PDM, NLFgA and NLDA in both OS (fibrinogen: AUC = 0.640, 95% CI = 0.556–0.718; p = 0.008) and DFS (fibrinogen: AUC = 0.628, 95% CI = 0.544–0.706; p = 0.020) (Table 2 and Figure 2). However, after Bonferroni correction, the p-values of all indexes have no significance.

Table 2

Analysis of Predictive Accuracy Through the Evaluation of the Area Under the Curve (AUC)

Characteristics	Overall Survival			Disease-Free Survival
	AUC	95% CI	P value	AUC	95% CI	P value
Platelet	0.522	0.438–0.606	0.675	0.531	0.446–0.614	0.576
D-dimer	0.541	0.457–0.624	0.432	0.527	0.443–0.611	0.616
Fibrinogen	0.640	0.556–0.718	0.008	0.628	0.544–0.706	0.020
PLR	0.560	0.475–0.642	0.257	0.585	0.500–0.666	0.121
PDM	0.558	0.473–0.640	0.271	0.547	0.462–0.629	0.394
NLFgA	0.606	0.522–0.686	0.044	0.584	0.499–0.665	0.125
NLDA	0.587	0.503–0.668	0.097	0.573	0.489–0.655	0.180

Note: P-value<0.05 are shown in bold.

Abbreviations: AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval; PLR, platelet-lymphocyte ratio; PDM, platelet × D-dimer; NLFgA, neutrophil × fibrinogen/(lymphocyte × albumin); NLDA, neutrophil × D-dimer/(lymphocyte × albumin).

Figure 2

Analysis of predictive accuracy through the evaluation of the area under the curve (AUC). (A) Overall survival (OS); (B) Disease-free survival (DFS). PLR, platelet-lymphocyte ratio; PDM, platelet × D-dimer; NLFgA, neutrophil × Fibrinogen/(lymphocyte × albumin); NLDA, neutrophil × D-dimer/(lymphocyte × albumin).

In addition, we were divided all patients into two groups (≤3.14 and >3.14 g/L) according to the level of fibrinogen (Table 3). The proportion of over 65 y patients (59.2% vs 44.8%), N+ stage patients (30.6% vs 16.7%), PDM>244.86 patients (30.6% vs 17.7%), and NLDA>0.06 patients (42.9% vs 33.3%) in the fibrinogen>3.14 group was higher than fibrinogen≤3.14 group, but the difference observed was not statistically significant (age, p = 0.101; N-stage, p = 0.053; PDM, p = 0.076; NLDA, p = 0.260). Compared with fibrinogen≤3.14 patients, patients in the fibrinogen>3.14 group were female (24.5% vs 8.3%; p = 0.008), larger tumor size (>4.7cm: 36.7% vs 16.7%; p = 0.007), higher T stage (T3–4: 61.2% vs 36.5%; p = 0.005), M stage (M1: 10.2% vs 2.1%; p = 0.031), platelet (>ULN: 20.4% vs 8.3%; p = 0.037), D-dimer (>0.55: 53.1% vs 34.4%; p = 0.030), PLR (>154.62: 55.1% vs 36.5%; p = 0.032) and NLFgA (>0.22: 73.5% vs 31.3%; p < 0.001).

Table 3

Baseline Characteristics of All Patients When Using Fibrinogen as an Assessment Tool

Characteristics	All Patients	≤3.14 g/L	>3.14 g/L	P
	No. (%)	No. (%)	No. (%)
Total patients	145	96 (66.2)	49 (33.8)
Age categorized, y				0.101
≤65	73 (50.3)	53 (55.2)	20 (40.8)
>65	72 (49.7)	43 (44.8)	29 (59.2)
Gender				0.008
Male	125 (86.2)	88 (91.7)	37 (75.5)
Female	20 (13.8)	8 (8.3)	12 (24.5)
Diabetes				0.342
Yes	21 (14.5)	12 (12.5)	9 (18.4)
No	124 (85.5)	84 (87.5)	40 (81.6)
Hypertension				0.876
Yes	52 (35.9)	34 (35.4)	18 (36.7)
No	93 (64.1)	62 (64.6)	31 (63.3)
Cardiovascular diseases				0.564
Yes	18 (12.4)	13 (13.5)	5 (10.2)
No	127 (87.6)	83 (86.5)	44 (89.8)
T-stage				0.005
T1–2	80 (55.2)	61 (63.5)	19 (38.8)
T3–4	65 (44.8)	35 (36.5)	30 (61.2)
N-stage				0.053
N0	114 (78.6)	80 (83.3)	34 (69.4)
N+	31 (21.4)	16 (16.7)	15 (30.6)
M-stage				0.031
M0	138 (95.2)	94 (97.9)	44 (89.8)
M1	7 (4.8)	2 (2.1)	5 (10.2)
Tumor size, cm				0.007
≤4.7	111 (76.6)	80 (83.3)	31 (63.3)
>4.7	34 (23.4)	16 (16.7)	18 (36.7)
Platelet, 10^9/L				0.037
≤ULN	127 (87.6)	88 (91.7)	39 (79.6)
>ULN	18 (12.4)	8 (8.3)	10 (20.4)
D-dimer, mg/L				0.030
≤0.55	86 (59.3)	63 (65.6)	23 (46.9)
>0.55	59 (40.7)	33 (34.4)	26 (53.1)
PLR				0.032
≤154.62	83 (57.2)	61 (63.5)	22 (44.9)
>154.62	62 (42.8)	35 (36.5)	27 (55.1)
PDM				0.076
≤244.86	113 (77.9)	79 (82.3)	34 (69.4)
>244.86	32 (22.1)	17 (17.7)	15 (30.6)
NLFgA				<0.001
≤0.22	79 (54.5)	66 (68.8)	13 (26.5)
>0.22	66 (45.5)	30 (31.3)	36 (73.5)
NLDA				0.260
≤0.06	92 (63.4)	64 (66.7)	28 (57.1)
>0.06	53 (36.6)	32 (33.3)	21 (42.9)

Note: P-value<0.05 are shown in bold.

Abbreviations: ULN, upper limit of normal; PLR, platelet-lymphocyte ratio; PDM, platelet × D-dimer; NLFgA, neutrophil × fibrinogen/(lymphocyte × albumin); NLDA, neutrophil × D-dimer/(lymphocyte × albumin).

Identification of Prognostic Factors of OS and DFS

We used univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models to determine the factor affecting the survival of patients with BCa. Univariate Cox regression analysis showed that T stage, N stage, M stage, tumor size, fibrinogen (Figure 3), PDM, NLFgA and NLDA were related factors of OS in patients with RC (Table 4), PLR and the above factors were related factors of DFS (Table 5). After the above variables were included in multivariate Cox regression analysis, T stage, N stage, M stage and fibrinogen were still independent risk factors for OS and DFS in patients with BCa. Moreover, fibrinogen>3.14 patients had worse OS (HR, 2.58, 95% CI = 1.28–5.23; p = 0.008) and DFS (HR, 2.60, 95% CI = 1.20–5.65; p = 0.016) compared with fibrinogen≤3.14 patients in multivariate Cox analysis.

Figure 3

Kaplan–Meier curves of survival based on plasma fibrinogen value of 145 BCa patients. (A) Overall survival (OS); (B) Disease-free survival (DFS).

Table 4

Univariate and Multivariate Analyses of Factors Associated with Overall Survival (OS)

Characteristics	Category or Characteristics	Univariate Analyses		Multivariate Analyses
		HR (95% CI)	P value	HR (95% CI)	P value
Age	>65/≤65	1.28 (0.70–2.34)	0.425
Gender	Female/Male	1.26 (0.56–2.84)	0.582
Diabetes	No/Yes	0.55 (0.26–1.14)	0.107
Hypertension	No/Yes	0.93 (0.49–1.77)	0.832
Cardiovascular diseases	No/Yes	0.74 (0.29–1.89)	0.530
T-stage	T3–4/T1–2	3.66 (1.88–7.13)	<0.001	1.59 (0.73–3.45)	0.239
N-stage	N+/N0	4.26 (2.32–7.82)	<0.001	2.72 (1.34–5.53)	0.006
M-stage	M1/M0	5.64 (1.96–16.19)	0.001	3.46 (1.03–11.66)	0.045
Tumor size, cm	>4.7/≤4.7	3.51 (1.86–6.62)	<0.001	2.49 (1.18–5.26)	0.017
Platelet, 10^9/L	>ULN/≤ULN	0.87 (0.31–2.44)	0.789
D-dimer, mg/L	>0.55/≤0.55	1.44 (0.79–2.63)	0.232
Fibrinogen, g/L	>3.14/≤3.14	3.57 (1.94–6.56)	<0.001	2.58 (1.28–5.23)	0.008
PLR	>154.62/≤154.62	1.75 (0.96–3.19)	0.068
PDM	>244.86/≤244.86	2.19 (1.14–4.22)	0.019	1.27 (0.56–2.90)	0.568
NLFgA	>0.22/≤0.22	2.49 (1.34–4.60)	0.004	1.17 (0.54–2.53)	0.694
NLDA	>0.06/≤0.06	2.02 (1.11–3.67)	0.022	1.00 (0.47–2.16)	0.997

Note: P-value<0.05 are shown in bold.

Abbreviations: OS, overall survival; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; ULN, upper limit of normal; PLR, platelet-lymphocyte ratio; PDM, platelet × D-dimer; NLFgA, neutrophil × fibrinogen/(lymphocyte × albumin); NLDA, neutrophil × D-dimer/(lymphocyte × albumin).

Table 5

Univariate and Multivariate Analyses of Factors Associated with Disease-Free Survival (DFS)

Characteristics	Category or Characteristics	Univariate Analyses		Multivariate Analyses
		HR (95% CI)	P value	HR (95% CI)	P value
Age	>65/≤65	1.22 (0.64–2.32)	0.538
Gender	Female/Male	1.23 (0.51–2.96)	0.637
Diabetes	No/Yes	0.64 (0.28–1.45)	0.282
Hypertension	No/Yes	0.90 (0.45–1.78)	0.761
Cardiovascular diseases	No/Yes	0.84 (0.33–2.16)	0.722
T-stage	T3–4/T1–2	4.62 (2.19–9.77)	<0.001	2.02 (0.85–4.80)	0.113
N-stage	N+/N0	4.43 (2.32–8.44)	<0.001	2.72 (1.24–6.01)	0.013
M-stage	M1/M0	7.09 (2.46–20.48)	<0.001	6.28 (1.69–23.29)	0.006
Tumor size, cm	>4.7/≤4.7	4.03 (2.07–7.86)	<0.001	3.19 (1.44–7.05)	0.004
Platelet, 10^9/L	>ULN/≤ULN	0.73 (0.22–2.37)	0.596
D-dimer, mg/L	>0.55/≤0.55	1.36 (0.72–2.58)	0.345
Fibrinogen, g/L	>3.14/≤3.14	3.56 (1.86–6.79)	<0.001	2.60 (1.20–5.65)	0.016
PLR	>154.62/≤154.62	2.08 (1.10–3.96)	0.025	1.33 (0.56–3.20)	0.520
PDM	>244.86/≤244.86	2.11 (1.04–4.26)	0.038	1.18 (0.48–2.90)	0.711
NLFgA	>0.22/≤0.22	2.27 (1.19–4.33)	0.013	0.89 (0.36–2.22)	0.805
NLDA	>0.06/≤0.06	1.91 (1.01–3.62)	0.047	0.89 (0.39–2.05)	0.786

Note: P-value<0.05 are shown in bold.

Abbreviations: DFS, disease-free survival; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; ULN, upper limit of normal; PLR, platelet-lymphocyte ratio; PDM, platelet × D-dimer; NLFgA, neutrophil × fibrinogen/(lymphocyte × albumin); NLDA, neutrophil × D-dimer/(lymphocyte × albumin).

Establishment and Verification of Prognostic Nomograms for OS and CSS

Based on the results of multivariate Cox regression analysis, we constructed OS and DFS nomograms based on N stage, M stage, tumor size and fibrinogen to predict the 1-year and 3-year survival rates of RC patients (Figure 4). Each subtype of the variables on the nomogram corresponds to a point on the “Point” scale. By adding the scores associated with each variable and projecting the “Total point” to the lowest number, the probabilities of OS and DFS for 1-year and 3-years can be estimated.

Figure 4

Nomogram predicting 1-, and 3-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rate of BCa patients. (A) OS rate; (B) CSS rate.

Analysis of the time-dependent ROC curves across the entire cohort showed that the AUC of the nomogram used to predict OS and DFS were 0.741 (95% CI = 0.662–0.810; p < 0.001) and 0.733 (95% CI = 0.653–0.803; p < 0.001), respectively (Figure 5A and B). In addition, DCA curves also shows better clinical utility of the nomogram (Figure 5C and D).

Figure 5

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and decision curve analysis (DCA) curves detects the predictive value of the nomograms. (A) ROC curve for overall survival (OS). (B) ROC curve for disease-free survival (DFS); (C) DCA curve for OS. (D) DCA curve for DFS.

Discussion

In this study, we collected clinical and laboratory data from patients and studied the effect of coagulation and fibrinolysis system factors on postoperative survival of RC patients. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that preoperative plasma fibrinogen was an independent risk factor for the prognosis of BCa patients treated with RC. Our study found that preoperative plasma fibrinogen can be used as an independent predictor of OS and DFS in patients with RC, and fibrinogen is a better predictor of prognosis than platelet, D-dimer, PLR, PDM, NLFgA and NLDA. In addition, the nomogram based on plasma fibrinogen has better accuracy and discrimination.

Most malignant tumor patients have obvious hypercoagulable state in the blood, which is closely related to the occurrence, development, recurrence and metastasis of tumor.15 Many studies have shown that tumor cells can secrete procoagulant active substances, such as tissue factor procoagulant activity (TF-PCA).16 In addition, the destruction of tissues by cancer cells can also release tissue factors and activate the coagulation process, making cancer patients more prone to hypercoagulable state.17 Hypercoagulable state can not only promote thrombosis and lead to thromboembolic disease, but also slow blood flow during hypercoagulation, and tumor cells are not affected by the shear stress. Instead, hypercoagulable state can promote tumor cells to form cancer thrombus, adhere to platelets or endothelium with the aid of fibrinogen adhesion, and promote tumor metastasis.18 The increased fibrinogen content aggravates the hypercoagulable state, and fibrinogen protects tumor cells from being killed by antibodies, chemotherapy and other drugs to some extent.19,20

Fibrinogen, also known as human coagulation factor I, with a molecular weight of 340kDa. It is mainly synthesized by liver parenchyma cells and is one of the main components of plasma proteins.21 Fibrinogen is about 2–4 g/L in normal human plasma, which is one of the central proteins in the coagulation system and the final substrate activated by coagulation factors in the process of coagulation, which can not only play the function of hemostasis and coagulation, but also mediate platelet aggregation and affect blood viscosity.22

In addition to the important role of fibrinogen in the coagulation pathway, fibrinogen is also involved in inflammation and cancer progression. Fibrinogen can act as a bridge between different adhesion molecules, increase the adhesion between leukocytes, platelets and tumor cells, and play an important role in tumor metastasis.23 Elevated plasma fibrinogen levels have been shown to be a poor prognostic indicator for prostate cancer, renal cell carcinoma and upper urothelial carcinoma.24 And studies have shown that plasma fibrinogen greater than 3.295g/L was an independent prognostic factor for early death in patients with robot-assisted RC.25 Our study found that plasma fibrinogen can be used as an independent risk factor for OS and CSS in BCa patients treated with RC.

We also found an interesting finding. It is well known that women with BCa have a poorer prognosis than men, but the exact mechanism is still unknown.26,27 In our study, the proportion of female patients in the high-fibrinogen group was much higher than in the low-fibrinogen group, which may also be a reason for the poor prognosis of female patients.

Nomogram plays an important role in predicting the prognosis and individualized treatment of patients. It has been widely used in urinary malignant tumors such as bladder cancer,28,29 prostate cancer,30 and renal cell carcinoma.31 In our study, we constructed a nomogram of fibrinogen based on the results of multivariate Cox regression analysis, which can accurately predict OS and DFS of BCa patients after RC. For the patients with high preoperative fibrinogen and large tumor size before surgery, early adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended to improve the survival time.

In this study, we investigated the effect of coagulation and fibrinolysis system factors on the prognosis of RC patients, and found that plasma fibrinogen is the effect of OS and DFS in BCa patients after RC. However, this study also has some limitations. This study is a single-center retrospective study, which needs to expand the sample to conduct a multicenter prospective study. Moreover, we do not include postoperative complications, which will also affect the prognosis of patients.

Conclusions

In summary, we observed that plasma fibrinogen can be used as an independent predictor of OS and DFS in BCa patients with RC, and the nomogram based on plasma fibrinogen can guide the individualized treatment plan for BCa patients, and further assessment of the patients’ systemic condition is needed before the application of the nomogram to clinical practice.