| Literature DB >> 33061509 |
Muhammed Majeed1,2,3, Shaheen Majeed1,2,3, Kalyanam Nagabhushanam2, Lakshmi Mundkur1, Prakriti Neupane3, Kalpesh Shah3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hair fall is a widespread problem among all genders, ages, and ethnicity with both physical and psychological effects.Entities:
Keywords: Cococin®; Cosmoperine®; PeptiSeLect®; Saberry®; TrichoScan®; anti-hair fall serum; hair follicles; hair growth; sandalwood odorant
Year: 2020 PMID: 33061509 PMCID: PMC7522433 DOI: 10.2147/CCID.S271013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol ISSN: 1178-7015
Patient Characteristics and Baseline Demographics
| Parameters | Hair Serum (n = 42) Male Subjects: 2mL, Female Subjects: 3.5mL |
|---|---|
| Mean (SD) | 37.3 (5.06) |
| Range | 25–45 |
| Male | 21 (50) |
| Female | 21 (50) |
| Asian–Indian heritage | 42 (100) |
| >100 and <200 | 42 (100) |
Abbreviations: n, number of subjects; SD, standard deviation.
Figure 1Dermatological assessment for Comb Test. Number of hairs collected after the hair comb test were counted and separated as hair fall with bulb and hair fall without bulb at visit 1, visit 6, visit 8 and visit 10; Values are expressed in Mean ± SE; *p<0.05 by t-test.
Figure 2Hair Thinning evaluation by Image comparison. Hair fall was measured using MSCR 10-point photo-numeric hair thinning scale which was compared with the image taken from VISIA CR imaging, lower the grade better the result, values are expressed as Mean ± SE, *p<0.05 by t-test.
Figure 3(A) Hair fall assessment by linear photo numerical scale. Hair fall was assessed using MSCR 10-point photo-numeric hair thinning scale compared with the scalp of the subjects directly during their study visits; Lower the value better the result; values are expressed as mean grade ± SE. (B) Hair pull test assessment results. Hair was firmly tugged away from the scalp as fingers slide along the hair shaft and the number of extracted hairs were counted. Values are expressed as mean number of hairs per pull ± SE, *p<0.05 by t-test.
Figure 4TrichoScan® Assessment in 1 cm2 shaved area of the scalp. (A) Assessments of hair density as number of hairs per cm2. (B) Assessments of Hair Growth rate as length of hair grown per 2 days. (C) Assessment of anagen and telogen %. (D) Density of terminal and vellus hair as the number of hairs per cm2. Values are expressed as mean ± SE; *p<0.05 by t-test.
Changes in Self-Assessment Questionnaire, Mean (SD)
| Product (N=42) | Baseline Day 0 | Visit 6 (M1) Day 30 | Visit 8 (M2) Day 60 | Visit 10 (M3) Day 90 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hair fall rate | 2.62 (0.62) | 3.36 (0.76) | 4.33 (0.75) | 4.74 (0.45) |
| Hair texture | 2.57 (0.59) | 2.93 (0.41) | 3.17 (0.38) | 3.69 (0.47) |
| Hair volume | 2.71 (0.51) | 2.83 (0.44) | 2.95 (0.44) | 3.02 (0.52) |
| Grading hair fall | 1.52 (0.51) | 0.43 (0.7) | 0.02 (0.15) | 0 (0) |
| Scalp itching | 0.81 (0.59) | 0.05 (0.31) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Notes: N, number; SD, standard deviation; M, month; hair fall rate: 1 = more than 100 (worst possible condition), 2= 50–100, 3= 30–50, 4= 10–30, 5= less than 10 (best possible condition); hair texture: 1 = rough and frizzy (worst possible condition), 2= rough, 3= normal, 4= soft, 5= very soft (best possible condition); hair volume score: 1= very less volume (worst possible condition), 2= less volume, 3= average, 4= good volume, 5= excellent (best possible condition); grading hair fall: 0= no itching (best possible condition), 1= negligible itching-no concern, 2= mild itching, 3= moderate itching, 4= severe itching, 5= very severe itching-compromises the daily routine.
Quality of Life Questionnaire (Change from Baseline to Final Visit)
| Questions | Visit 1 (Baseline) | Visit 10 (Final Visit) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Often | Sometimes | Rarely | Always | Never | Often | Sometimes | Rarely | Always | Never | |
| Q1 | 6 (14.29%) | 24 (57.14%) | 7 (16.67%) | 5 (11.9%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 4 (9.52%) | 0 (0%) | 38 (90.48%) |
| Q2 | 10 (23.81%) | 24 (57.14%) | 3 (7.14%) | 5 (11.9%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 4 (9.52%) | 0 (0%) | 38 (90.48%) |
| Q3 | 13 (30.95%) | 20 (47.62%) | 2 (4.76%) | 7 (16.67%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 42 (100%) |
| Q4 | 10 (23.81%) | 22 (52.38%) | 9 (21.43%) | 1 (2.38%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 42 (100%) |
| Q5 | 5 (11.9%) | 29 (69.05%) | 2 (4.76%) | 6 (14.29%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 42 (100%) |
| Q6 | 16 (38.1%) | 17 (40.48%) | 4 (9.52%) | 5 (11.9%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (4.76%) | 0 (0%) | 40 (95.24%) |
Notes: Values are expressed as the number of subjects responded for each category and percentage of subjects in parenthesis. Q1: Do you feel uncomfortable, frustrated, or stressed because of your hair fall? Q2: Do you feel that your physical appearance has deteriorated due to your hair fall, and do you look in the mirror too often or avoid looking in the mirror entirely? Q3: Do you feel uncomfortable when people in the community ask you about your hair fall? Q4: Do you avoid your friends or refrain from attending social situations because of your hair fall? Q5: Do you get desperate thinking that your hair fall will never improve? Q6: When treating your hair fall, have you ever thought that you are just wasting time and money?