| Literature DB >> 33061302 |
Abstract
PURPOSE: We analyze a number of studies that describe the relationship between the onset of hypothyroidism and the prognosis of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with TKIs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Targeted therapies are currently considered as the first-line treatment for patients with mRCC. The occurrence of hypothyroidism in the treatment of mRCC with TKIs is a major side effect. A comprehensive search was performed in Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Institute for Scientific Information, and CKNI. The following keywords and descriptors were used during the search and were combined in a number of sequences in English and Chinese languages: protein kinase inhibitors (including sunitinib, pazopanib, tivozanib, cabozantinib, axitinib, sorafenib), hypothyroidism and renal cell carcinoma.Entities:
Keywords: OS; PFS; TKIs; hypothyroidism; mRCC; metastatic renal cell carcinoma; overall survival; progression-free survival; tyrosine kinase inhibitors
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33061302 PMCID: PMC7532040 DOI: 10.2147/DDDT.S270210
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Drug Des Devel Ther ISSN: 1177-8881 Impact factor: 4.162
Current Analysis of TKIs and Prognosis
| Researcher | Year | Study Type | TKIs | Patients Number | Incidence of Hypothyroidism | PFS (Months) | OS | Comparison Object |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vasileiadis et al | 2019 | Retrospective | Sunitinib | 70 | 30(42.86%) | 11.92 vs. 8.63 (p=0.0476) | 3.10 vs. 1.08 years (p=0.0011) | Patients had a day-15/baseline TSH ratio<2 vs. patients had a day-15/baseline TSH ratio<2 |
| Buda Nowak et al | 2017 | Retrospective | Sunitinib | 27 | 12(44%) | 28.3 vs. 9.8 (p = 0.022) | NG | Hypothyroid vs. euthyroid patients |
| Bailey et al | 2015 | Retrospective | VEGFR-TKIs (Sunitinib/sorafenib/pazopanib/axitinib) | 65 | 25(38.5%) | 47.7 vs. 9.3 (P=0.009) | Not reached vs. 21.4 months (P=0.005). | Severe hypothyroidism (TSH > 10 mIU/L) vs. combined euthyroidism and mild hypothyroidism (TSH≤10 mIU/L) |
| Kust et al | 2014 | Retrospective | Sunitinib | 41 | 12(29.3%) | 25.3 vs. 9.0 (p=0.042) | 46.0 vs. 22.1 months (p=0.2052). | Patients with TSH >4 mIU/L and receiving levothyroxine vs. all other patients |
| Sella et al | 2012 | Retrospective | Sunitinib | 31 | 16 (52%) | 12.2 vs. 9.4 (p = 0.234) | 22.4 vs. 13.9 months (p = 0.234) | Hypothyroid vs. euthyroid patients |
| Sabatier et al | 2012 | Prospective observational multicenter | Sunitinib | 107 | 54(53%) (102 with normal baseline) | 18.9 vs. 15.9 (P = 0.94) | NG | Patients with abnormal thyroid function vs. normal thyroid function |
| Clemons et al | 2012 | Retrospective chart review | Sunitinib/Sorafenib | 61 | 15/34 (44%) sunitinib 6/22 (27%) sorafenib | 18.2 vs. 10.1 (P=0 0.01) | NG | Hypothyroid vs. euthyroid patients |
| Baldazzi et al | 2012 | Prospective single-center | Sunitinib | 22 | 13(59.1%) | 8.55 vs. 7.03 (P<0.05) | NG | Hypothyroid vs. euthyroid patients |
| Ismael Pinto et al | 2012 | Retrospective | Sunitinib | 50 | 20(40%) | 21.7 and 14.2 (p<0.0001) | NG | Hypothyroid vs. euthyroid patients |
| Riesenbeck et al | 2011 | Prospective | Sorafenib/sunitinib | 83 | 31 (37.3%) sorafenib 52 (62.7%) sunitinib | 16.0 vs. 6.0 (P = 0.032). | NG | Hypothyroid vs. euthyroid patients |
| Schmidinger et al | 2011 | Prospective | Sunitinib/sorafenib | 83a 78b | 30 (36.1%) a | 17.0 vs. 10.8 (P=0.53)b | NR vs. 13.9 months (P=0.016)a | Hypothyroid vs. euthyroid patients |
| P. Wolter et al | 2008 | Prospectively | Sunitinib | 40 | 28(70%) | 10.3 vs. 3.6 (P=0.047) | 18.2 versus 6.6 (P=0.13) | Hypothyroid vs. euthyroid patients |
Notes: aEvaluable for incidence of hypothyroidism and OS analysis within 2 months of treatment. bEvaluable for PFS analysis within 2 months of treatment.
Abbreviations: NG, not given in the study; NR, not reached in the study.