| Literature DB >> 33060624 |
Zhangting Chen1,2, Chaoying Wang3, Xuemei Chen1, Zhongxun Yuan1, Hong Song1, Changxiao Li4.
Abstract
The leaves of riparian plants are the main source of energy and nutrients in riparian ecosystems. In order to evaluate the nutrient release of reforested trees in a riparian zone, a field litterbag experiment involving three foliar types (the leaves of either coniferous and broadleaf trees as single-leaf treatment, or a mixture of coniferous and broadleaf leaves as a heterogenous-leaf treatment) and different submergence depths [no submergence (CK), shallow submergence (Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33060624 PMCID: PMC7562734 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-74062-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Repeated-measures ANOVA results for the remaining foliar mass and contents of C, N, and P.
| Source of variation | F-value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MR | C | N | P | |
| Foliar type | 281.22*** | 63.69*** | 89.16*** | 124.76*** |
| Submergence depth | 3398.32*** | 1465.28*** | 450.05*** | 545.32*** |
| Decomposition time | 2713.44*** | 1288.96*** | 457.16*** | 572.17*** |
| Foliar type × submergence depth | 16.69*** | 14.12*** | 0.81 | 6.387** |
| Foliar type × decomposition time | 8.39*** | 6.70*** | 5.75*** | 6.22*** |
| Decomposition time × submergence depth | 66.93*** | 32.54*** | 24.25*** | 28.50*** |
| Foliar type × decomposition time × submergence depth | 4.44*** | 4.03*** | 1.68* | 1.32 |
MR, Mass remaining.
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Mass loss and nutrient release of C, N, and P after 30 days and 360 days decomposition of bald cypress (A), Chinese willow (B), and heterogeneous-leaf (C) treatments under different submergence depths.
| Depth | Foliar type | Mass loss (%) | C release (%) | N release (%) | P release (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 days | 360 days | 30 days | 360 days | 30 days | 360 days | 30 days | 360 days | ||
| CK | A | 18.95 ± 1.07Cb | 53.71 ± 0.4Cc | 16.48 ± 1.26Bb | 71.44 ± 2.39Ab | − 11.62 ± 6.94Bb | 53.92 ± 3.29Ab | 22.06 ± 2.77Ab | 85.2 ± 0.5Ac |
| B | 27.81 ± 0.76Ac | 67.08 ± 1Ac | 28.13 ± 1.94Ab | 73.05 ± 0.79Ac | − 1.26 ± 2.84ABb | 53.64 ± 0.91Ac | 19.59 ± 6.23Ab | 77.33 ± 0.47Bb | |
| C | 23.55 ± 1.16Bb | 61.43 ± 0.74Bc | 25.63 ± 1.59Ab | 64.87 ± 0.27Bc | 10.17 ± 2.97Ab | 60.22 ± 1.98Ab | 24.68 ± 4.96Ab | 70.4 ± 1.97Cb | |
| SS | A | 50.68 ± 0.61Ba | 82.89 ± 0.48Ba | 42.01 ± 1.06Ba | 86.5 ± 0.55Ba | 29.1 ± 3.19Ba | 76.58 ± 0.59Ba | 68.59 ± 0.57Ca | 90.82 ± 0.25Bb |
| B | 63.83 ± 0.35Aa | 89.05 ± 1.77Aa | 55.36 ± 0.54Aa | 91.87 ± 1.33Aa | 29.84 ± 2.5Ba | 87.98 ± 1.45Aa | 86.45 ± 0.5Aa | 92.99 ± 1.04Ba | |
| C | 62.05 ± 1.82Aa | 90.09 ± 0.32Aa | 55.69 ± 2.13Aa | 90.15 ± 0.35Aa | 40.06 ± 2.32Aa | 86.72 ± 1.02Aa | 77.8 ± 0.54Ba | 96.23 ± 0.5Aa | |
| DS | A | 48.23 ± 1.39Ca | 79.32 ± 1.37Bb | 43.3 ± 3.33Ba | 82.69 ± 1.74Aa | 28.47 ± 1.04Ba | 77.73 ± 2.96ABa | 63.76 ± 1.61Ba | 92.77 ± 0.55Aa |
| B | 59.29 ± 0.65Bb | 78.84 ± 0.59Bb | 53.39 ± 1.28Aa | 79.58 ± 1.55Ab | 26.97 ± 2.87Ba | 74.09 ± 2.14Bb | 81.98 ± 0.98Aa | 93.65 ± 0.29Aa | |
| C | 64.42 ± 0.76Aa | 84.96 ± 1.76Ab | 58.68 ± 0.93Aa | 85.69 ± 2.19Ab | 46.78 ± 2.3Aa | 83.99 ± 2.15Aa | 78.92 ± 1.12Aa | 94.63 ± 0.9Aa | |
Different capital letters indicate significant differences in mass loss and nutrient release from different foliar types under the same treatment; different lowercase letters indicate significant differences in mass loss and nutrient release of the same foliar type under different treatments.
CK, control check (no submergence); SS, shallow submergence, DS deep submergence.
Equations and parameters of the natural logarithm (y) of the remaining leaf mass regressed against the decomposition days (t) of bald cypress (A), Chinese willow (B), and heterogeneous-leaf (C) treatments under different submergence depths (n = 40).
| Depth (m) | Foliar type | Regression models | k′ | R2 | t0.95 (days) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | A | y = 0.889e−1.70t | 1.70 | 0.88 | < 0.001 | 1762.20 |
| B | y = 0.837e−2.47t | 2.47 | 0.91 | < 0.001 | 1212.85 | |
| C | y = 0.831e−2.30t | 2.30 | 0.92 | < 0.001 | 1302.49 | |
| SS | A | y = 0.640e−3.80t | 3.80 | 0.80 | < 0.001 | 788.35 |
| B | y = 0.523e−4.14t | 4.14 | 0.74 | < 0.001 | 723.61 | |
| C | y = 0.509e−4.25t | 4.25 | 0.74 | < 0.001 | 704.88 | |
| DS | A | y = 0.640e−3.52t | 3.52 | 0.81 | < 0.001 | 851.06 |
| B | y = 0.545e−3.04t | 3.04 | 0.69 | < 0.001 | 985.44 | |
| C | y = 0.520e−3.83t | 3.83 | 0.70 | < 0.001 | 782.18 |
t0.95, time of 95% decomposition; k′, k × 103; CK, control check (no submergence); SS, shallow submergence; DS, deep submergence.
Figure 1Changes in the decomposition and nutrient release rate (k, g g−1 days−1) of the leaves of bald cypress, Chinese willow, and the mixture under different submergence depths.
Changes in the nutrient release rate (k, g g−1 days−1) of bald cypress (A), Chinese willow (B), and heterogeneous-leaf (C) treatments under different submergence depths.
| Foliar type | Depth (m) | C | N | P | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | R2 | R2 | |||||
| A | CK | 2.97 | 0.87 | 2.03 | 0.73 | 4.69 | 0.87 |
| SS | 4.84 | 0.87 | 3.48 | 0.80 | 5.13 | 0.79 | |
| DS | 3.75 | 0.73 | 3.61 | 0.77 | 5.96 | 0.84 | |
| B | CK | 3.21 | 0.87 | 2.19 | 0.86 | 3.73 | 0.87 |
| SS | 5.07 | 0.82 | 4.77 | 0.87 | 3.92 | 0.44 | |
| DS | 3.21 | 0.64 | 3.49 | 0.73 | 5.08 | 0.66 | |
| C | CK | 2.79 | 0.87 | 2.53 | 0.86 | 3.65 | 0.75 |
| SS | 4.66 | 0.83 | 4.30 | 0.87 | 5.67 | 0.70 | |
| DS | 4.31 | 0.75 | 4.50 | 0.80 | 5.72 | 0.74 | |
k′, k × 103; CK, control check (no submergence); SS, shallow submergence; DS, deep submergence.