| Literature DB >> 33059218 |
Ashraf Kagee1, Jason Bantjes2, Wylene Saal2, Adelle Sterley3.
Abstract
Patients receiving HIV care at two public health facilities in South Africa were assessed using the Centres for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale Revised (CESD-R) and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM5 to assess major depressive disorder. Of the 688 study participants, 229 (33.3%; CI = 29.8%; 36.9%) scored in the elevated range on the CESD-R and 170 (24.7%; CI = 21.5% to 28.1%) met the diagnostic criteria for major depressive disorder (MDD). ROC curve analysis indicated that a CESD-R cut-point of 26.5 (rounded to 27) yielded optimal sensitivity (0.81) and specificity (0.82) in determining caseness for MDD. Positive and negative predictive values of the CESD-R were 60.26% and 92.98%, respectively. The AUC was 0.89 (89%) (95% CI = 0.86-0.92) indicating moderate to high accuracy. For the purpose of routine screening in the context of HIV care, the CESD-R appears to hold promise in identifying cases of MDD. Those who screen positive may then undergo a formal diagnostic interview to determine whether they are true cases for MDD, and referred for treatment.Entities:
Keywords: Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression-Scale Revised; Major depressive disorder; Sensitivity; Specificity
Year: 2020 PMID: 33059218 DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2020.09.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Gen Hosp Psychiatry ISSN: 0163-8343 Impact factor: 3.238