Literature DB >> 33059051

EEG and MEG primers for tracking DBS network effects.

Vladimir Litvak1, Esther Florin2, Gertrúd Tamás3, Sergiu Groppa4, Muthuraman Muthuraman5.   

Abstract

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective treatment method for a range of neurological and psychiatric disorders. It involves implantation of stimulating electrodes in a precisely guided fashion into subcortical structures and, at a later stage, chronic stimulation of these structures with an implantable pulse generator. While the DBS surgery makes it possible to both record brain activity and stimulate parts of the brain that are difficult to reach with non-invasive techniques, electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) provide complementary information from other brain areas, which can be used to characterize brain networks targeted through DBS. This requires, however, the careful consideration of different types of artifacts in the data acquisition and the subsequent analyses. Here, we review both the technical issues associated with EEG/MEG recordings in DBS patients and the experimental findings to date. One major line of research is simultaneous recording of local field potentials (LFPs) from DBS targets and EEG/MEG. These studies revealed a set of cortico-subcortical coherent networks functioning at distinguishable physiological frequencies. Specific network responses were linked to clinical state, task or stimulation parameters. Another experimental approach is mapping of DBS-targeted networks in chronically implanted patients by recording EEG/MEG responses during stimulation. One can track responses evoked by single stimulation pulses or bursts as well as brain state shifts caused by DBS. These studies have the potential to provide biomarkers for network responses that can be adapted to guide stereotactic implantation or optimization of stimulation parameters. This is especially important for diseases where the clinical effect of DBS is delayed or develops slowly over time. The same biomarkers could also potentially be utilized for the online control of DBS network effects in the new generation of closed-loop stimulators that are currently entering clinical use. Through future studies, the use of network biomarkers may facilitate the integration of circuit physiology into clinical decision making.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33059051     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117447

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  8 in total

1.  Deep brain stimulation for parkinson's disease induces spontaneous cortical hypersynchrony in extended motor and cognitive networks.

Authors:  Maxwell B Wang; Matthew J Boring; Michael J Ward; R Mark Richardson; Avniel Singh Ghuman
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2022-10-08       Impact factor: 4.861

2.  A Longitudinal Magnetoencephalographic Study of the Effects of Deep Brain Stimulation on Neuronal Dynamics in Severe Anorexia Nervosa.

Authors:  Sven Braeutigam; Jessica Clare Scaife; Tipu Aziz; Rebecca J Park
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 3.617

3.  Differential dopaminergic modulation of spontaneous cortico-subthalamic activity in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Abhinav Sharma; Diego Vidaurre; Jan Vesper; Alfons Schnitzler; Esther Florin
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 4.  Neuroimaging evaluation of deep brain stimulation in the treatment of representative neurodegenerative and neuropsychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Shichun Peng; Vijay Dhawan; David Eidelberg; Yilong Ma
Journal:  Bioelectron Med       Date:  2021-03-30

5.  Cortical network organization reflects clinical response to subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Martina Bočková; Eva Výtvarová; Martin Lamoš; Petr Klimeš; Pavel Jurák; Josef Halámek; Sabina Goldemundová; Marek Baláž; Ivan Rektor
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Deep Brain Stimulation Think Tank: Advances in Cutting Edge Technologies, Artificial Intelligence, Neuromodulation, Neuroethics, Pain, Interventional Psychiatry, Epilepsy, and Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Joshua K Wong; Günther Deuschl; Robin Wolke; Hagai Bergman; Muthuraman Muthuraman; Sergiu Groppa; Sameer A Sheth; Helen M Bronte-Stewart; Kevin B Wilkins; Matthew N Petrucci; Emilia Lambert; Yasmine Kehnemouyi; Philip A Starr; Simon Little; Juan Anso; Ro'ee Gilron; Lawrence Poree; Giridhar P Kalamangalam; Gregory A Worrell; Kai J Miller; Nicholas D Schiff; Christopher R Butson; Jaimie M Henderson; Jack W Judy; Adolfo Ramirez-Zamora; Kelly D Foote; Peter A Silburn; Luming Li; Genko Oyama; Hikaru Kamo; Satoko Sekimoto; Nobutaka Hattori; James J Giordano; Diane DiEuliis; John R Shook; Darin D Doughtery; Alik S Widge; Helen S Mayberg; Jungho Cha; Kisueng Choi; Stephen Heisig; Mosadolu Obatusin; Enrico Opri; Scott B Kaufman; Prasad Shirvalkar; Christopher J Rozell; Sankaraleengam Alagapan; Robert S Raike; Hemant Bokil; David Green; Michael S Okun
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 3.473

7.  Clinical and neurophysiological effects of central thalamic deep brain stimulation in the minimally conscious state after severe brain injury.

Authors:  Hisse Arnts; Prejaas Tewarie; Willemijn S van Erp; Berno U Overbeek; Cornelis J Stam; Jan C M Lavrijsen; Jan Booij; William P Vandertop; Rick Schuurman; Arjan Hillebrand; Pepijn van den Munckhof
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 8.  A Systematic Review of Treatment Outcome Predictors in Deep Brain Stimulation for Refractory Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.

Authors:  Hanyang Ruan; Yang Wang; Zheqin Li; Geya Tong; Zhen Wang
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-07-17
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.