Annabel Burnley1,2, Krysten W Bold3, Grace Kong3, Ran Wu3, Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin3. 1. Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 2. King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK. 3. Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: E-cigarette use among adolescents is increasingly popular and a growing public health concern. OBJECTIVES: To examine how individual e-cigarette use perceptions differ between adolescents based on e-cigarette use status and susceptibility to future use of e-cigarettes. METHODS: Data were collected using surveys administered across eight Connecticut high schools (grades 9-12), Spring 2015. N = 2592 students (Mage = 16.01, SD = 1.28, Female = 51.7%) reported e-cigarette use and susceptibility and were categorized into non-susceptible never-users (57.8%), susceptible never-users (16.9%) and ever-users (25.4%). Youth also responded to 12 e-cigarette use perceptions describing perceived benefits and risks of e-cigarette use. RESULTS: A multinomial logistic regression model was used. Eight use perceptions were related to susceptibility or use of e-cigarettes. The benefit-related use perception "feel relaxed" was the only item associated with greater odds of being both susceptible (vs. non-susceptible, p <.001) and an ever-user (vs. susceptible; p <.05). Two other benefit-related use perceptions were related to higher odds of being susceptible to e-cigarette use ("control your weight"; AOR = 1.82, p <.05; "look cool"; AOR = 3.13, p <.05). Results also identified key risk-related use perceptions that related to lower odds of either being susceptible to e-cigarette use ("have a heart attack"; AOR =.43, p <.001) or of ever-use ("have bad breath"; AOR =.28, p <.001; "get lung cancer"; AOR =.58, p <.05). CONCLUSION: E-cigarette use perceptions among youth differ by e-cigarette use and susceptibility status. Findings could help identify youth who are vulnerable to e-cigarette use and inform prevention, for example by developing counter-messaging for benefit perceptions associated with susceptibility and ever-use.
BACKGROUND: E-cigarette use among adolescents is increasingly popular and a growing public health concern. OBJECTIVES: To examine how individual e-cigarette use perceptions differ between adolescents based on e-cigarette use status and susceptibility to future use of e-cigarettes. METHODS: Data were collected using surveys administered across eight Connecticut high schools (grades 9-12), Spring 2015. N = 2592 students (Mage = 16.01, SD = 1.28, Female = 51.7%) reported e-cigarette use and susceptibility and were categorized into non-susceptible never-users (57.8%), susceptible never-users (16.9%) and ever-users (25.4%). Youth also responded to 12 e-cigarette use perceptions describing perceived benefits and risks of e-cigarette use. RESULTS: A multinomial logistic regression model was used. Eight use perceptions were related to susceptibility or use of e-cigarettes. The benefit-related use perception "feel relaxed" was the only item associated with greater odds of being both susceptible (vs. non-susceptible, p <.001) and an ever-user (vs. susceptible; p <.05). Two other benefit-related use perceptions were related to higher odds of being susceptible to e-cigarette use ("control your weight"; AOR = 1.82, p <.05; "look cool"; AOR = 3.13, p <.05). Results also identified key risk-related use perceptions that related to lower odds of either being susceptible to e-cigarette use ("have a heart attack"; AOR =.43, p <.001) or of ever-use ("have bad breath"; AOR =.28, p <.001; "get lung cancer"; AOR =.58, p <.05). CONCLUSION: E-cigarette use perceptions among youth differ by e-cigarette use and susceptibility status. Findings could help identify youth who are vulnerable to e-cigarette use and inform prevention, for example by developing counter-messaging for benefit perceptions associated with susceptibility and ever-use.
Authors: Bárbara Piñeiro; John B Correa; Vani N Simmons; Paul T Harrell; Nicole S Menzie; Marina Unrod; Lauren R Meltzer; Thomas H Brandon Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2015-09-14 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Peter Hajek; Maciej L Goniewicz; Anna Phillips; Katie Myers Smith; Oliver West; Hayden McRobbie Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2014-08-13 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Paul T Enlow; Desireé N Williford; Katelyn F Romm; Geri A Dino; Melissa D Blank; Pamela J Murray; Christine A Banvard; Christina L Duncan Journal: J Pediatr Psychol Date: 2022-02-03