Yosuke Inoue1, Akio Saiura1,2, Atsushi Oba1, Yoshihiro Ono1, Yoshihiro Mise1,2, Hiromichi Ito1, Takashi Sasaki3, Masato Ozaka3, Naoki Sasahira3, Yu Takahashi1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan. 2. Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Juntendo University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. 3. Department of Gastroenterological medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/ PURPOSE: We evaluated efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (GNP-NAT) in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BR-PC) patients compared to conventional upfront surgery (UPS). METHODS: This single-center retrospective study assessed 151 consecutive patients: 96 diagnosed in 2008-2014 underwent UPS (UPS group) and 55 diagnosed in 2015-2017 underwent GNP-NAT (GN group). Patient background, surgical, pathological, and survival outcomes were compared between groups. RESULTS: Age, sex, and pretreatment carbohydrate antigen 19-9 were similar between groups. After four courses of NAT-GNP, 46 GN patients (84%) underwent surgery while all UPS patients underwent surgery. Only three GN patients (5%) underwent non-therapeutic procedures, compared to 23 (24%) in the UPS group (P = .004). In the whole cohort, R0-resection was achieved in 40 GN patients (73%) vs 46 UPS patients (48%; P = .004) and the 3-year overall survival was significantly higher in the GN group (median survival time, 31.9 vs 18.1 months, P = .014). In the resection cohort, the R0-resection rate was 93% (GN) vs 63% (UPS; P = .0007). There was no 90-day mortalities in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Intention-to-treat-based analysis indicated considerable benefits of GNP-NAT in BR-PCs for long-term survival, contributing to improved tumor suppression and patient selection.
BACKGROUND/ PURPOSE: We evaluated efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (GNP-NAT) in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BR-PC) patients compared to conventional upfront surgery (UPS). METHODS: This single-center retrospective study assessed 151 consecutive patients: 96 diagnosed in 2008-2014 underwent UPS (UPS group) and 55 diagnosed in 2015-2017 underwent GNP-NAT (GN group). Patient background, surgical, pathological, and survival outcomes were compared between groups. RESULTS: Age, sex, and pretreatment carbohydrate antigen 19-9 were similar between groups. After four courses of NAT-GNP, 46 GN patients (84%) underwent surgery while all UPS patients underwent surgery. Only three GN patients (5%) underwent non-therapeutic procedures, compared to 23 (24%) in the UPS group (P = .004). In the whole cohort, R0-resection was achieved in 40 GN patients (73%) vs 46 UPS patients (48%; P = .004) and the 3-year overall survival was significantly higher in the GN group (median survival time, 31.9 vs 18.1 months, P = .014). In the resection cohort, the R0-resection rate was 93% (GN) vs 63% (UPS; P = .0007). There was no 90-day mortalities in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Intention-to-treat-based analysis indicated considerable benefits of GNP-NAT in BR-PCs for long-term survival, contributing to improved tumor suppression and patient selection.