Literature DB >> 33058469

Morbidity and mortality after robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion in octogenarians: results from the European Association of Urology Robotic Urology Section Scientific Working Group.

Ashkan Mortezavi1,2,3, Alessio Crippa3, Sebastian Edeling4, Sasa Pokupic4, Paolo Dell'Oglio5,6,7, Francesco Montorsi5, Frederiek D'Hondt6, Alexandre Mottrie6,7, Karel Decaestecker8, Carl J Wijburg9, Justin Collins10, John D Kelly10, Wei Shen Tan10, Ashwin Sridhar10, Hubert John11, Abdullah Erdem Canda12, Christian Schwentner13, Erik Peder Rönmark1, Peter Wiklund1,14, Abolfazl Hosseini1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the postoperative complication and mortality rate following laparoscopic radical cystectomy (RARC) with intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD) in octogenarians. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis comparing postoperative complication and mortality rates depending on age in a consecutive series of 1890 patients who underwent RARC with ICUD for bladder cancer between 2004 and 2018 in 10 European centres. Outcomes of patients aged <80 years and those aged ≥80 years were compared with regard to postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grading) and mortality rate. Cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and other-cause mortality (OCM) after surgery were calculated using the non-parametric Aalen-Johansen estimator.
RESULTS: A total of 1726 patients aged <80 years and 164 aged ≥80 years were included in the analysis. The 30- and 90-day rate for high-grade (Clavien-Dindo grades III-V) complications were 15% and 21% for patients aged <80 years compared to 11% and 13% for patients aged ≥80 years (P = 0.2 and P = 0.03), respectively. In a multivariable logistic regression analysis adjusting for pre- and postoperative variables, age ≥80 years was not an independent predictor of high-grade complications (odds ratio 0.6, 95% confidence interval 0.3-1.1; P = 0.12). The non-cancer-related 90-day mortality was 2.3% for patients aged ≥80 years and 1.8% for those aged <80 years, respectively (P = 0.7). The estimated 12-month CSM and OCM rates for those aged <80 years were 8% and 3%, and for those aged ≥80 years, 15% and 8%, respectively (P = 0.009 and P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The minimally invasive approach to RARC with ICUD for bladder cancer in well-selected elderly patients (aged ≥80 years) achieved a tolerable high-grade complication rate; the 90-day postoperative mortality rate was driven by cancer progression and the non-cancer-related rate was equivalent to that of patients aged <80 years. However, an increased OCM rate in this elderly group after the first year should be taken into account. These results will support clinicians and patients when balancing cancer-related vs treatment-related risks and benefits.
© 2020 The Authors BJU International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International.

Entities:  

Keywords:  #BladderCancer; #EndoUrology; #blcsm; #uroonc; bladder cancer; complication; intracorporeal diversion; mortality; octogenarian; robot-assisted radical cystectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33058469      PMCID: PMC8246851          DOI: 10.1111/bju.15274

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


Introduction

Radical cystectomy (RC) with pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) represents the 'gold standard' therapy for selected high‐risk non‐muscle‐invasive and muscle‐invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) [1]. Unfortunately, this major surgical procedure is associated with significant peri‐operative morbidity and mortality [2]. In addition to the surgical complexity of RC and subsequent urinary diversion, patients with bladder cancer are diagnosed at a more advanced age (median 73 years) and harbour multiple risk factors, contributing to their known adverse event profile [3]. Specifically in elderly patients, concerns have been expressed about the higher morbidity and mortality rates associated with RC [4], resulting in <20% of octogenarians with MIBC undergoing RC, which indicates that a significant number of patients are not currently being offered definitive treatment [5]. The evidence indicates that 85% of untreated patients with localized MIBC succumb to the disease within 5 years of the diagnosis, whereas <10% die from other causes [6]. At the same time, reported high‐grade complication rates in elderly populations for open RC (ORC) have been up to 33%, and the 90‐day mortality rates are approximately 15% [7, 8, 9]. This adds to the complexity of the risk–benefit analysis that urologists face while evaluating the risk of death from tumour progression vs the risks of peri‐operative mortality. Significant efforts have been made to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with RC. These measures include centralization of bladder cancer treatment to high‐volume centres [10], introduction of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols [11], and standardization of surgical technique [12], together with the implementation of robot‐assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy (RARC) [13]. The latter is considered to offer benefits in terms of estimated blood loss (EBL) and length of hospital stay (LOS) [14]. However, outcome data for elderly patients treated by RARC with intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD) are sparse [15, 16]. We hypothesized that this subgroup of patients may benefit differentially from a fully minimally invasive approach, and performed an analysis of complications, mortality rates and survival outcomes based on age in a contemporary bladder cancer population treated with RARC followed by ICUD at multiple high‐volume European centres.

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 2039 consecutive patients who underwent RARC with ICUD between 2004 and 2018 at 10 European centres. All patients underwent surgery at a tertiary care hospital with access to geriatric and palliative care specialists. No specific geriatric assessment was performed routinely; however, treatment decisions were made by an interdisciplinary team at all participating sites. The techniques of RARC and ICUD, and the follow‐up scheme differed among institutions. Bowel anastomoses were predominantly performed by the surgical assistant using a laparoscopic stapler. Data were reviewed for preoperative characteristics (age, gender, body mass index [BMI], neoadjuvant chemotherapy [NAC], American Society of Anesthesiologists [ASA] score), operative variables (operation time [skin‐to‐skin], EBL, type of diversion), and postoperative outcomes (staging, lymph node yield/invasion and LOS). A cut‐off age of ≥80 years was used to define elderly patients [5, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19]. Complications were reported by type and on a per‐patient basis, categorized using the modified Clavien–Dindo classification [20], subdivided into short (30‐day) and long‐term (90‐day) events. The quality criteria for reporting of surgical outcomes recommended by the European Association of Urological Guidelines were considered and fulfilled for 11/14 criteria (Table S1). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data. Differences between the groups were statistically assessed using the Pearson chi‐squared test for categorical and the Mann–Whitney U‐test for continuous variables, respectively. A multivariable logistic regression model was fitted to assess the impact of age on complications. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were fit to evaluate preoperative, operative and postoperative predictors of all‐cause mortality (ACM) and cause‐specific mortality following RARC. Cumulative incidence functions for cancer‐specific mortality (CSM) and other‐cause mortality (OCM) were estimated non‐parametrically with the Aalen‐Johansen estimator and compared between age groups using the Gray's test [21]. Overall survival (OS) curves were derived as 1 – ACM, and compared between age groups with the log‐rank test. Finally, to investigate a possible effect of the learning curve on outcome in the elderly cohort, we plotted the number of cases per year, classified for each age group and centre. Values were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS statistical software (v25; IBM Corp.) and R (survival and cmprsk packages).

Results

After exclusion of 149 cases (no cancer, non‐urothelial cancer, uretero‐cutaneostomy, extracorporeal urinary diversion [ECUD], missing variables), a total of 1890 patients were included in this analysis (Fig. S1), with 164 (8.7%) of these identified as aged ≥80 years. Peri‐operative variables are presented in Table 1. There were significant differences between younger patients and patients aged ≥80 years, including the rate of NAC, ASA score, LOS, operating time, diversion type, PLND, overall lymph node yield, EBL, and tumour stage.
Table 1

Peri‐operative variables.

<80 years (n = 1726)≥80 years (n = 164) P
Age, years67 (60, 73)82 (81, 83) <0.001
Men, n (%)1378 (79.8)125 (79.5)0.3
BMI, kg/m2 26 (23, 28)25 (23, 28)0.2
Missing, n (%)496 (28.7)34 (20.7)
NAC, n (%)466 (27.9)8 (5.0) <0.001
Missing, n (%)57 (3.3)4 (2.4)
ASA score, n (%)
I202 (12.8)3 (1.9) <0.001
II831 (52.5)67 (43.5)
III521 (32.9)81 (52.6)
IV30 (1.9)3 (1.9)
Missing142 (8.2)10 (6.1)
Preoperative T stage, n (%)0.2
Ta/ T1/ Tis535 (31.0)42 (25.6)
T2984 (57.0)105 (64.0)
T3/ T4207 (12.0)17 (10.4)
Operating time, min340 (284, 410)299 (240, 343) <0.001
Missing, n (%)461 (26.7)44 (26.8)
EBL, mL200 (100, 350)150 (100, 288) 0.005
Missing, n (%)427 (24.7)40 (24.4)
Type of diversion, n (%)
Conduit1172 (67.9)161 (98.2) <0.001
Neobladder554 (32.1)3 (1.8)
PLND, n (%)1610 (96.4)135 (84.4) <0.001
Missing, n (%)56 (3.2)4 (2.4)
No. of nodes* 19 (13, 25)16 (11, 23) 0.003
Missing, n (%)15 (0.9)2 (1.5)
pN+, n (%)321 (19.1)35 (22.0)0.4
Missing, n (%)48 (2.8)5 (3.0)
pT stage, n (%) 0.002
pT0388 (22.6)25 (15.2)
pTa76 (4.4)4 (2.4)
pTis136 (7.9)10 (6.1)
pT1184 (10.7)11 (6.7)
pT2350 (20.4)29 (17.7)
pT3432 (25.2)60 (36.6)
pT4148 (8.6)25 (15.2)
Missing11 (0.6)0 (0)
LOS, days 9 (7.0, 14.0)10 (8.0, 14.3) 0.014
Missing322 (18.7)9 (8.5)

ASA, American Society of Anaesthesiologists; BMI, body mass index; EBL, estimated blood loss LOS, length of hospital stay; NAC, neoadjuvant chemotherapy; PLND, pelvic lymph node dissection.

Data presented as median (quartile 1, quartile 3), unless otherwise specified.

In patients with PLND.

Bold face indicates P < 0.05.

Peri‐operative variables. ASA, American Society of Anaesthesiologists; BMI, body mass index; EBL, estimated blood loss LOS, length of hospital stay; NAC, neoadjuvant chemotherapy; PLND, pelvic lymph node dissection. Data presented as median (quartile 1, quartile 3), unless otherwise specified. In patients with PLND. Bold face indicates P < 0.05. To further investigate the difference in PLND rates between the age groups, we performed a multivariable logistic regression analysis; age ≥80 years remained a predictor of not undergoing PLND after adjusting for other baseline covariates such as BMI, NAC, ASA score and tumour stage (odds ratio [OR] 0.46, 95% CI 0.24–0.89; P = 0.021). The per‐patient 30‐ and 90‐day rates for high‐grade (Clavien–Dindo III–V) complications were 15.0% and 21.3% for patients aged <80 years compared to 11.0% and 13.3% for patients aged ≥80 years (Table 2; P = 0.2 and P = 0.031), respectively. Comparable rates were observed when only patients receiving an ileal conduit were included (14.2% and 20.1% for age <80 years vs 11.2% and 13.3% for age ≥80 years; P = 0.332 and P = 0.074). The two most common complication types were infectious and gastrointestinal in both age groups (Table 3). A larger proportion of complications in these two categories were graded as Clavien–Dindo ≥III in the age group <80 years (47% and 34%) than in the age group ≥80 years (29% and 26%), implying lower intervention or intensive care unit admission rates. Notably, cardiac and neurological low‐grade complications occurred more frequently in the elderly (P = 0.045) without effects on the high‐grade complication rate.
Table 2

Thirty‐ and ninety‐day complication rate according to the Clavien–Dindo classification system.

0–30 days0–90 days*
<80 years (n = 1726)≥80 years (n = 164) P <80 years (n = 1524)≥80 years (n = 128) P
All complications835 (48.4)84 (51.2)0.14856 (56.2)71 (55.5)0.06
Number of complications
1663 (38.4)66 (40.2)0.9553 (36.4)46 (35.9)0.9
2131 (7.6)14 (8.5)217 (14.2)19 (14.8)
328 (1.6)4 (2.4)61 (4.0)4 (3.1)
46 (0.3)0 (0)15 (1.0)2 (1.6)
5–61 (0.1)0 (0)8 (0.5)0 (0)
N/A3 (0.2)0 (0)3 (0.2)0(0)
Low‐Grade (Clavien I–II)576 (33.4)66 (40.2)0.084532 (34.9)54 (42.2)0.1
High grade (Clavien III‐V)259 (15.0)18 (11.0)0.2324 (21.3)17 (13.3) 0.031
Clavien I124 (7.2)16 (9.8)0.4100 (6.6)12 (9.4)0.2
Clavien II452 (26.2)50 (30.5)432 (28.3)42 (32.8)
Clavien IIIa102 (5.9)4 (2.4)135 (8.9)6 (4.7)
Clavien IIIb89 (5.2)6 (3.7)117 (7.7)5 (3.9)
Clavien IV56 (3.2)7 (4.3)51 (3.4)6 (4.7)
Clavien V12 (0.7)1 (0.6)21 (1.4)0 (0)

Variables reported as frequency (percentage). Only the complication with the highest grade was considered and reported on a per‐patient basis for each time period.

Differences in the patient numbers are due to one centre not reporting 90‐day complication rates. Includes all postoperative complications up to 90 days.

Bold face indicates P < 0.05.

Table 3

Summary of 90‐day postoperative complications classified for organ categories.

Category0–90 days (all complications*)0–90 days (Clavien–Dindo III–V)
<80 years (n = 1524)≥80 years (n = 128) P <80 years (n = 1524)≥80 years (n = 128) P
Gastrointestinal209 (13.7)21 (16.4)0.498 (6.4)6 (4.7)0.6
Paralytic ileus151(9.9)18 (14.1)0.1747 (3.1)4 (3.1)1
Mechanical ileus26 (1.7)2 (1.6)125 (1.6)2 (1.6)1
Bowel anastomotic leakage18 (1.2)0 (0)0.417 (1.1)0 (0)1
Other14 (0.9)1 (0.8)19 (0.6)0 (0)1
Infectious380 (24.9)38 (29.7)0.2130 (8.5)10 (7.8)0.9
Fever/ UTI/ pyelonephritis245 (16.1)20 (15.6)171 (4.7)7 (5.5)0.7
Sepsis66 (4.3)7 (5.5)0.524 (1.6)2 (1.6)1
Pneumonia32 (2.1)3 (2.3)0.813 (0.9)0 (0)0.6
Abscess25 (1.6)1 (0.8)0.716 (1.0)1 (0.8)1
Wound4 (0.3)0 (0)13 (0.2)0 (0)1
Other8 (0.5)7 (0.8)0.53 (0.2)0 (0)1
Genitourinary185 (12.1)12 (9.3)0.4144 (9.4)8 (6.3)0.3
Urine leakage (intra‐abdominal)61 (4.0)3 (2.3)0.547 (3.1)3 (2.3)1
Ureteric stricture38 (2.5)2 (1.6)0.835 (2.3)2 (1.6)1
Hydronephrosis27 (1.8)2 (1.6)122 (1.4)1 (0.8)1
Stent/catheter malfunction/dislocation16 (1.0)0 (0.0)0.612 (0.8)0 (0)0.6
Acute renal failure13 (0.9)1 (0.8)19 (0.6)1 (0.8)0.6
Fistula12 (0.8)0 (0.0)0.610 (0.7)0 (0)1
Other18 (1.2)4 (3.1)0.099 (0.6)1 (0.8)0.6
Cardiac20 (1.3)5 (3.9) 0.039 14 (0.9)1 (0.8)1
Atrial fibrillation6 (0.4)3 (2.3) 0.027 4 (0.3)0 (0)1
Myocardial infarction3 (0.2)1 (0.8)0.32 (0.1)1 (0.8)1
Hyper‐/hypotension5 (0.3)1 (0.8)0.42 (0.1)0 (0)1
Other6 (0.4)0 (0)16 (0.4)0 (0)1
Pulmonary17 (1.1)1 (0.8)110 (0.7)0 (0)1
Pulmonary embolism12 (0.8)0 (0)0.67 (0.5)0 (0)1
Other5 (0.3)1 (0.8)0.43 (0.2)0 (0)1
Haematological/vascular56 (3.7)5 (3.9)0.827 (1.8)0 (0)0.3
Anaemia due to postoperative bleeding41 (2.7)4 (3.1)0.820 (1.3)0 (0)0.4
Thromboembolic event12 (0.8)0 (0)0.65 (0.3)0 (0)1
Other3 (0.1)1 (0.8)0.22 (0.1)0 (0)1
Abdominal wall/ stoma40 (2.4)2 (1.6)0.834 (2.2)2 (1.6)1
Hernia/ fascial dehiscence27 (1.8)1 (0.8)0.725 (1.6)1 (0.8)0.7
Parastomal hernia5 (0.3)1 (0.8)0.43 (0.2)1 (0.8)0.3
Stoma dysfunction/necrosis8 (0.5)0 (0)16 (0.4)0 (0)1
Neurological14 (0.9)4 (3.1) 0.045 1 (0.1)0 (0)1
Delirium6 (0.4)3 (2.3) 0.027 0 (0)0 (0)
Peripheral neuropathy5 (0.3)1 (0.8)0.40 (0)0 (0)
Transient ischaemic attack1 (0.1)0 (0)10 (0)0 (0)
Other2 (0.1)0 (0)11 (0)0 (0)1
Bleeding27 (1.8)0 (0)0.322 (1.4)0 (0)0.4
Lymphocele27 (1.8)0 (0)0.316 (1.0)0 (0)0.6
Metabolic15 (1.090 (0)0.68 (0.5)0 (0)1
Compartment syndrome3 (0.2)0 (0)13 (0.2)0 (0)1
Other18 (1.2)1 (0.8)18 (0.5)0 (0)1

Variables reported as frequency (percentage). *All reported complications regardless of grade. †Only complications that occurred in patients with a Clavien–Dindo grade of ≥III. The denominator is the number of patients in each group.

Bold face indicates P < 0.05.

Thirty‐ and ninety‐day complication rate according to the Clavien–Dindo classification system. Variables reported as frequency (percentage). Only the complication with the highest grade was considered and reported on a per‐patient basis for each time period. Differences in the patient numbers are due to one centre not reporting 90‐day complication rates. Includes all postoperative complications up to 90 days. Bold face indicates P < 0.05. Summary of 90‐day postoperative complications classified for organ categories. Variables reported as frequency (percentage). *All reported complications regardless of grade. †Only complications that occurred in patients with a Clavien–Dindo grade of ≥III. The denominator is the number of patients in each group. Bold face indicates P < 0.05. In multivariable logistic regression analyses, age ≥80 years was not an independent predictor of high‐grade complications (OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.3–1.1; P = 0.12) after adjusting for multiple variables including type of diversion and PLND (Table 4). Interestingly, a higher BMI (≥26 kg/m2) was associated with a decreased risk of high‐grade complications (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.5–0.98; P = 0.036) while longer operating time was associated with an increased rate of such an event (per 30 min, OR 1.1, 95% CI 1.01–1.1; P = 0.034).
Table 4

Multivariable logistic regression for developing postoperative complications stratified for all and high‐grade events.

Any complicationComplications Clavien–Dindo ≥ III
OR95% CI P OR95% CI P
LowerUpperLowerUpper
Age at surgery
≥80 vs <80 years1.10.71.80.60.60.31.10.1
Sex
Female vs male1.10.81.50.70.80.51.20.3
BMI
≥26 vs <26 kg/m2 0.80.61.10.110.70.50.98 0.036
NAC
Yes vs no0.90.71.30.71.10.81.50.6
ASA score
III–IV vs I–II1.20.91.50.31.10.81.50.5
Operating time
Continuous, per 20 min1.11.041.1 <0.001 1.051.011.1 0.034
EBL
Continuous, per 200 mL1.040.91.20.61.10.981.30.1
PLND
Performed vs not performed10.52.20.91.40.53.70.5
Type of diversion
Neobladder vs conduit1.40.971.90.0740.80.51.10.2

ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists; BMI, body mass index; EBL, estimated blood loss; NAC, neoadjuvant chemotherapy; OR, odds ratio; PLND, pelvic lymph node dissection.

Bold face indicates P < 0.05.

Multivariable logistic regression for developing postoperative complications stratified for all and high‐grade events. ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists; BMI, body mass index; EBL, estimated blood loss; NAC, neoadjuvant chemotherapy; OR, odds ratio; PLND, pelvic lymph node dissection. Bold face indicates P < 0.05. The median (interquartile range) follow‐up time for survivors was 18 (8, 35) months. The estimated 30‐day and 90‐day ACM rates in the age group ≥80 years were 2.8% (n = 4) and 7.5% (n = 10) and in the age group <80 years 1.0% (n = 16) and 2.7% (n = 40), respectively (P = 0.06 and P < 0.02). We performed an in‐depth analysis of cause of death for 90‐day mortality. In the age group ≥80 years, seven (70%) of the deaths were attributed directly to bladder cancer progress, two (20%) to an infection/sepsis and one (10%) to a cardiac event. In the age group <80 years, data were available for 29 patients (73%), and the respective event rates were 13 (45%), three (10%), and eight (28%), respectively. Five patients (17%) died from other causes (ileus, other cancer, gastric ulcer/bleeding, suicide). The estimated non‐cancer‐related 90‐day mortality was 2.3% (n = 3) for patients aged ≥80 years and 1.8% for those aged <80 years (n = 27), respectively (P = 0.726). Estimates for CSM, OCM and OS are shown in Fig. 1 and Fig. 2. One centre did not differentiate between CSM and OCM, therefore, these patients were excluded from the survival analysis. The estimated 12‐month CSM, OCM and OS for the age group <80 years were 8%, 3% and 89% and, for the age group ≥80 years, 15%, 8% and 77%, respectively (P = 0.009, P < 0.001 and P < 0.001). While the OCM difference between the age groups was significant through all subgroups (pT0–2N0, pT3–4N0, pTanyN+; P < 0.05), CSM was comparable after adjusting for tumour stage (P = 0.13 and P = 0.63). Survival curves and cause‐specific mortality for patients with different ASA score groups are shown in Fig. 2. For the age group ≥80 years, the OCM and OS estimates for 12 months were comparable between those with ASA scores I–II and those with ASA scores III–IV (7% and 77% vs 9% and 76%). However, mortality and survival differences were observed for the 60‐month estimates (24% and 54% vs 29% and 24%).
Fig. 1

Cumulative incidence functions illustrating cancer‐specific (CSM), other‐cause mortality (OCM), and overall survival (OS; 1 – all‐cause mortality) for patients undergoing robot‐assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with intracorporeal urinary diversion, stratified by age group (red <80 years, blue ≥80 years) and according to pathological tumour stage (pT) in node‐negative patients. Tables include the number of events for CSM and OCM, numbers at risk for OS, and estimates for 1 and 5 years. P values derived using Gray’s and log‐rank tests.

Fig. 2

Cumulative incidence functions illustrating cancer‐specific (CSM), other‐cause mortality (OCM) and overall survival (OS; 1 – all‐cause mortality) for patients undergoing robot‐assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with intracorporeal urinary diversion, stratified by age groups (red <80 years, blue ≥80 years) and for node‐positive cases and according to the American Society of Anaesthesiologists score. Tables includes the number of events for CSM and OCM, numbers at risk for OS, and estimates for 1 and 5 years. P values derived using Gray’s and log‐rank tests.

Cumulative incidence functions illustrating cancer‐specific (CSM), other‐cause mortality (OCM), and overall survival (OS; 1 – all‐cause mortality) for patients undergoing robot‐assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with intracorporeal urinary diversion, stratified by age group (red <80 years, blue ≥80 years) and according to pathological tumour stage (pT) in node‐negative patients. Tables include the number of events for CSM and OCM, numbers at risk for OS, and estimates for 1 and 5 years. P values derived using Gray’s and log‐rank tests. Cumulative incidence functions illustrating cancer‐specific (CSM), other‐cause mortality (OCM) and overall survival (OS; 1 – all‐cause mortality) for patients undergoing robot‐assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with intracorporeal urinary diversion, stratified by age groups (red <80 years, blue ≥80 years) and for node‐positive cases and according to the American Society of Anaesthesiologists score. Tables includes the number of events for CSM and OCM, numbers at risk for OS, and estimates for 1 and 5 years. P values derived using Gray’s and log‐rank tests. In the univariate Cox regression model, age ≥80 years was a predictor of CSM, OCM and ACM (hazard ratio [HR] 1.7 [95% CI 1.2–2.5], HR 4.4 [95% CI 2.7–7.1] and HR 2.3 [95% CI 1.7–3.1]; P = 0.007, P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively [Table 5A]. However, in the multivariate analysis, age was not an independent predictor for CSM and ACM (HR 1.1 [95% CI 0.7–1.8] and 1.3 [95% CI 0.9–2.0]; P = 0.8 and P = 0.02, respectively [Table 5B]) after adjustment for sex, BMI, ASA score, tumour stage, operating time, EBL, pN and complications. Notably, occurrence of high‐grade complications remained an independent predictor of OCM and ACM, with an HR of 5.2 (95% CI 2.2–12.4) and 1.6 (95% CI 1.1–2.2; P < 0.001 and P = 0.009, respectively). Finally, although an ASA score of III–IV was observed to be prognostic in the univariate analysis for OCM and ACM (HR 2.2 [95% CI 1.5–3.3] and 1.5 [95% CI 1.2–1.8]; P < 0.001 and P < 0.001), it did not show an independent association in the multivariate analysis.
Table 5

Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analysis for cancer‐specific, other‐cause and all‐cause mortality.

VariableCharacteristicsCancer‐specific mortalityOther‐cause mortalityAll‐cause mortality
HR95% CI P HR95% CI P HR95% CI P
A) Univariable
Age at surgery≥80 years vs <80 years1.701.2–2.5 0.007 4.402.7–7.1 <0.001 2.301.7–3.1 <0.001
Sexfemale vs male1.401.0–1.8 0.041 0.680.4–1.20.21.200.9–1.50.3
BMI≥26 vs <26 kg/m2 0.700.5–0.9 0.008 0.700.4–1.10.10.700.6–0.9 0.004
ASA scoreIII–IV vs I–II1.301.0–1.70.0732.201.5–3.3 <0.001 1.501.2–1.9 <0.001
pT stagepT2 vs pTa/T1/Tis2.301.5–3.5 <0.001 1.200.7–2.20.51.701.2–2.5 0.002
pT3/T4 vs pTa/T1/Tis7.505.2–10.7 <0.001 3.102.0–5.0 <0.001 5.203.9–6.8 <0.001
Operating timecontinuous, per 20 min1.001.0–1.00.81.000.9–1.00.40.990.9–1.00.4
Estimated blood losscontinuous, per 200ml1.000.9–1.10.41.201.1–1.3 0.004 1.101.0–1.2 0.038
pNpN + vs pN–4.803.7–6.2 <0.001 1.901.1–3.2 0.013 3.502.8–4.4 <0.001
ComplicationsLow–grade vs none0.800.6–1.10.22.201.0–5.0 0.049 0.970.7–1.30.8
High–grade vs none1.000.7–1.40.94.402.0–9.5 <0.001 1.301.0–1.80.077
B) Multivariable
Age at surgery≥80 years vs <80 years1.100.7–1.80.82.601.2–5.9 0.022 1.300.9–2.00.2
Sexfemale vs male1.100.8–1.60.50.800.3–1.90.51.100.8–1.50.6
BMI≥26 vs <26 kg/m2 0.800.6–1.10.20.600.3–1.10.090.800.6–1.00.09
ASA scoreIII–IV vs I–II1.200.9–1.60.32.001.0–3.80.0531.301.0–1.70.08
pT stagepT2 vs pTa/T1/Tis1.601.0–2.80.0691.000.4–2.70.91.500.9–2.40.09
pT3/T4 vs pTa/T1/Tis4.603.0–7.2 <0.001 2.101.0–4.80.0523.802.6–5.6 <0.001
Operating timecontinuous, per 20 min1.001.0–1.00.90.900.9–1.00.21.000.9–1.00.3
Estimated blood losscontinuous, per 200 mL1.000.9–1.10.61.200.9–1.60.11.101.0.1.20.2
pNpN + vs pN–2.702.0–3.8 <0.001 1.300.6–3.20.52.301.7–3.1 <0.001
ComplicationsLow‐grade vs none0.900.7–1.30.81.700.7–4.40.31.000.7–1.50.8
High‐grade vs none1.200.8–1.80.45.202.2–12.4 <0.001 1.601.1–2.2 0.009

ASA, American Society of Anaesthesiologists; BMI, body mass index; HR, hazard ratio; PLND, pelvic lymph node dissection.

Bold face indicates P < 0.05.

Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analysis for cancer‐specific, other‐cause and all‐cause mortality. ASA, American Society of Anaesthesiologists; BMI, body mass index; HR, hazard ratio; PLND, pelvic lymph node dissection. Bold face indicates P < 0.05. Analysing annual cases in each centre and stratifying them for age groups revealed that seven out of 10 centres did not offer RARC to patients aged ≥80 years in the first year of the observation period (Fig. S2).

Discussion

Despite many advances in medical and surgical therapies, population‐based mortality rates resulting from bladder cancer have remained unchanged for more than 30 years [22]. However, recent publications focusing on selected cohorts treated with curative intent report far better survival rates [23]. This discrepancy is partly explained by an undertreatment of patients with localized bladder cancer on a population level. Analyses in the USA and Sweden revealed that 55–79% of patients with non‐metastatic MIBC do not undergo treatment with curative intent, resulting in significantly lower OS rates in the surveillance groups [24, 25]. Indeed, in a population‐based analysis for localized MIBC, the median time to CSM was 71 months if patients were treated with curative intent and 10 months if not. Notably, at 6 months after diagnosis, 38% of the untreated patients had died from bladder cancer vs 6.5% in the treated group [6]. Based on these findings, balancing the risks of cancer‐ and treatment‐related mortality clearly favours a curative approach in younger and healthier patients, however, in older patients treatment decisions may focus on perceived risks of life‐threatening or fatal complications associated with RC, and a dovish strategy may be preferred. Therefore, outcome data on peri‐operative morbidity and mortality are needed for accurate counselling and decision making in this steadily growing cohort of elderly patients with bladder cancer [26]. The present study is the first investigation reporting on morbidity and mortality risks in a contemporary multicentre cohort of elderly patients treated by RARC with ICUD, and provides evidence that the complication and mortality rates associated with RC with a fully minimally invasive approach in carefully selected octogenarians is favourable. Minimally invasive strategies have gained popularity because of their potential to reduce surgical morbidity and shorten LOS. Two prospective randomized trials have shown a significantly lower EBL, transfusion rate and LOS for RARC with ECUD compared to ORC [27, 28]. Just recently in a three‐way comparison of ORC, RARC with ECUD and RARC with ICUD, the fully intracorporeal approach demonstrated a further reduction of EBL, LOS, ileus rate, and importantly, lower major complication rates, but longer operating time when compared to the other two techniques [29]. The question arises of whether older patients, such as octogenarians, are more likely to benefit from the above‐mentioned advantages of RARC with ICUD due to faster recovery [30] or are potentially exposed to higher peri‐operative risks due to the longer operating time. An association of age and complication rates has been reported for ORC but standardized data for octogenarians have been sparse [4]. Donat et al. [5] reported a higher rate of 90‐day Clavien–Dindo grade III–V complications in patients aged ≥80 years undergoing ORC (17% vs 13%), but, after adjusting for preoperative variables, no significant difference was detected. For small single‐surgeon case series of RARC followed by ECUD in this population, favourable high‐grade complication rates ranging between 4% and 15% [17, 31, 32] have been reported. Only two studies have included octogenarians undergoing RARC with ICUD (n = 63 and n = 14) reporting an overall Clavien–Dindo ≥III rate of 14–26% [15, 33]. However, a significant amount of the patient population underwent ECUD, making it impossible to assess the impact of the fully minimally invasive approach without stratification of the results. In the present study, we did not observe an increased rate of high‐grade complications associated with ICUD in octogenarians; the 90‐day high‐grade complication rate was 13% and therefore lower than previously reported rates in representative (n > 25) elderly populations for ORC (17–35.9%) [5, 7, 34, 35, 36], RARC with ECUD (15%) [32], and RARC with ICUD and ECUD (26%) [33], respectively. This beneficial observation may be attributed to the fully minimally invasive approach with ICUD [29]. Notably, the rate was also lower compared to the observed 21% (all) and 20% (ileum conduit) in younger patients in our cohort, respectively. The imbalance of baseline characteristics was addressed in the multivariable logistic regression model; after adjustment for PLND and diversion type, higher age did not show an association with high‐grade complications. A possible explanation for the lower high‐grade rate in older patients could be the fact that some centres introduced RARC with ICUD first in the younger patients, and included patients aged ≥80 years at a later time point on the learning curve when confidence with the technique had been gained (Fig. S2). Additionally, the lower high‐grade complication rate in the elderly might also be attributed to a more conservative approach to postoperative complications suggested by the higher low‐grade complication rate in the group. Finally, the operating time was shorter in the patients aged ≥80 years (296 vs 351 min), indicating that those cases were performed by more experienced surgeons. Notably, the overall mean operating time for RARC with ICUD in the present study (346 min) was not longer than those reported for ORC (343 min, population‐based registry ‘Bladder Base’, Sweden). Overall, more than 85% of the patients aged ≥80 years did not experience a high‐grade postoperative complication after RARC, which is an encouraging outcome. Our in‐depth analysis of early postoperative death revealed that the 90‐day ACM rate in patients aged ≥80 years was mainly driven by tumour progression (70%) representing poor patient selection and that the non‐cancer‐related mortality rate was low (2.3%, in the context of age and the aggressive nature of the disease) and comparable to that of younger patients (1.8%; P = 0.7). This observation is consistent with the established tendency to defer RC in older individuals until all alternatives have been exhausted [37] and an earlier treatment of this population could potentially reduce this early cancer‐driven mortality rate. Ultimately, a comparison with contemporary open series in octogenarians revealed a potential benefit of the RARC approach; our 30‐day and 90‐day ACM rate of 2.8% and 7.5% was constantly lower than the reported rates of 5.8–7.7% and 13–18%, respectively [7, 8, 9, 38]. The survival analysis revealed that CSM drives the overall mortality rates irrespective of patient age. This was more obvious for the first year after RARC with an observed CSM for patients aged <80 years and patients aged ≥80 years of 8% and 15% compared to an OCM of 3% and 8%, respectively. Although this difference was still significant after 5 years for the younger patients (24% CSM and 8% OCM), in patients aged ≥80 years, it decreased to 32% (CSM) and 25% (OCM). These findings have significant implications for therapeutic decisions in this contemporary cohort of elderly patients; an estimated 12‐month OCM rate of <10% is a strong argument for curative treatment considering the reported 12‐month CSM rate of nearly 60% for untreated MIBC [6] and 12‐month OS of <45% with symptom improvement of only 53% for palliative radiation therapy in stage I–II bladder cancer [39]. Additionally, our observed 5‐year OS rate of 43% in patients aged ≥80 years treated by RARC with ICUD is consistently higher than reported rates for ORC (27% [7] and 23% [9]), RARC with ECUD (35% [32]), and RARC with ICUD and ECUD (28% [33]), which may be partly attributed to patient selection and increasing life expectancy, but also a lower 90‐day mortality in the present cohort. Finally, in the multivariate Cox regression analysis, high‐grade complications remained an independent predictor of ACM, highlighting its clinical relevance in the context of the observed lower rate in our RARC cohort compared to ORC and RARC with ECUD cohorts. To assess the clinical value of ASA score in patients aged ≥80 years for outcome after RARC, we included it in the survival analyses. Notably, a higher ASA score had only a small impact on OCM in the first year after RARC (7% for ASA scores I–II and 9% for ASA scores III–IV; Fig. 2). This remained unchanged even after 5 years (24% and 29%). Notably, the estimated 5‐year CSM rate was significantly higher in patients with ASA scores III–IV (46%) compared to those with ASA scores I–II (21%), indicating that elderly patients with higher ASA scores are more likely to undergo surgery if they harbour advanced tumours. A limitation of the present study consists in the surgical selection bias. Elderly RC patients may be in a better health condition than age‐matched controls, which may affect OCM rates. However, more than half of this population had an ASA score of III–IV, reflecting a contemporary patient cohort in clinical practice. Since this was a multicentre retrospective study, the surgical technique and peri‐operative care was not standardized, representing possible confounders with regard to mortality rates. Results of this study may not be generalizable to all centres as this patient cohort underwent surgery in high‐volume centres. Elderly patients were more likely to not be considered at the beginning of the learning curve, with a potential negative impact on outcome in the control group. However, most centres included patients aged ≥80 years very soon after the beginning of the observation period and the very large number of younger patients included subsequently may compensate for this selection bias. Furthermore, no data on readmission rates and quality of life, especially relevant to the elderly group, were available. Finally, the median follow‐up time of 18 months is rather short for longer survival estimates. Nevertheless, combined with a minimum follow‐up of 90 days for 86% of the patients, the assessments of the peri‐operative and 1‐year mortality remain robust. In conclusion, the present study represents the first multicentre analysis of morbidity and mortality in patients aged ≥80 years with bladder cancer undergoing RARC with ICUD. The minimally invasive approach is associated with a tolerable high‐grade complication rate in well‐selected elderly patients. The postoperative 90‐day mortality in patients aged ≥80 years is largely driven by cancer progression and the non‐cancer‐related rate is equivalent to that of younger patients. However, an increased OCM rate in the elderly group (patients aged ≥80 years) after the first year has to be taken into account. These results will support clinicians and patients taking difficult therapeutic decisions when balancing cancer‐related vs treatment‐related risks and benefits.

Conflicts of Interest

Dr. Decaestecker reports personal fees from Intuitive Surgical, personal fees from MSD, outside the submitted work; Dr. Collins reports grants from Medtronic, personal fees from Medtronic, personal fees from Intuitive Surgical, personal fees from CMR Surgical, outside the submitted work; Other authors declare no conflicts of interest. all‐cause mortality American Society of Anaesthesiologists body mass index cancer‐specific mortality estimated blood loss extracorporeal urinary diversion hazard ratio intracorporeal urinary diversion length of hospital stay carcinoma invading bladder muscle neoadjuvant chemotherapy other‐cause mortality odds ratio overall survival open radical cystectomy pelvic lymph node dissection radical cystectomy radical cystectomy Fig. S1. Patient selection process. ECUD, extracorporeal urinary diversion; ICUD, intracorporeal urinary diversion; RARC, robot‐assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy; y, years. Click here for additional data file. Fig. S2. Visualization of RARC cases per year and centre, classified by each age group (blue: <80 years, red: ≥ years). Click here for additional data file. Table S1. Quality criteria for accurate and comprehensive reporting of surgical outcomes recommended by the European Association of Urological (EAU) Guidelines on reporting and grading of complications. Click here for additional data file.
  38 in total

1.  Tutorial in biostatistics: competing risks and multi-state models.

Authors:  H Putter; M Fiocco; R B Geskus
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-05-20       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer in Octogenarians.

Authors:  Ruben De Groote; Giorgio Gandaglia; Nicolas Geurts; Marijn Goossens; Elisabeth Pauwels; Frederiek D'Hondt; Christian Gratzke; Nicola Fossati; Geert De Naeyer; Peter Schatteman; Paul Carpentier; Giacomo Novara; Alexandre Mottrie
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  Perioperative complications and 90-day mortality of radical cystectomy in the elderly (75+): a retrospective, multicentre study.

Authors:  Ingrid Berger; Thomas Martini; Clemens Wehrberger; Eva Comploj; Anton Ponholzer; Martina Wolfgang; Eckart Breinl; Michael Dunzinger; Johann Hofbauer; Wolfgang Höltl; Klaus Jeschke; Steffen Krause; Walter Kugler; Walter Pauer; Michael Rauchenwald; Armin Pycha; Stephan Madersbacher
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  Burden of Multiple Chronic Conditions among Patients with Urological Cancer.

Authors:  Tullika Garg; Amanda J Young; Korey A Kost; John F Danella; Sharon Larson; Matthew E Nielsen; H Lester Kirchner
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2017-08-05       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Palliative Radiation Therapy in Bladder Cancer-Importance of Patient Selection: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Amin Ali; Yee Pei Song; Shaveta Mehta; Hitesh Mistry; Ruth Conroy; Catherine Coyle; John Logue; Anna Tran; James Wylie; Tanzeel Janjua; Lisa Joseph; Joji Joseph; Ananya Choudhury
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 6.  Enhanced Recovery After Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy: EAU Robotic Urology Section Scientific Working Group Consensus View.

Authors:  Justin W Collins; Hiten Patel; Christofer Adding; Magnus Annerstedt; Prokar Dasgupta; Shamim M Khan; Walter Artibani; Richard Gaston; Thierry Piechaud; James W Catto; Anthony Koupparis; Edward Rowe; Matthew Perry; Rami Issa; John McGrath; John Kelly; Martin Schumacher; Carl Wijburg; Abdullah E Canda; Meviana D Balbay; Karel Decaestecker; Christian Schwentner; Arnulf Stenzl; Sebastian Edeling; Sasa Pokupić; Michael Stockle; Stefan Siemer; Rafael Sanchez-Salas; Xavier Cathelineau; Robin Weston; Mark Johnson; Fredrik D'Hondt; Alexander Mottrie; Abolfazl Hosseini; Peter N Wiklund
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Robot-assisted radical cystectomy in octogenarians.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Phillips; Vik Uberoi; Ingolf A Tuerk
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 2.942

8.  Comparing Open Radical Cystectomy and Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Bernard H Bochner; Guido Dalbagni; Daniel D Sjoberg; Jonathan Silberstein; Gal E Keren Paz; S Machele Donat; Jonathan A Coleman; Sheila Mathew; Andrew Vickers; Geoffrey C Schnorr; Michael A Feuerstein; Bruce Rapkin; Raul O Parra; Harry W Herr; Vincent P Laudone
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Cystectomy for bladder cancer in Denmark during the 2006-2013 period.

Authors:  Per Bagi; Cecilie Bagi Nordsten; Henrik Kehlet
Journal:  Dan Med J       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.240

10.  Is robot-assisted radical cystectomy justified in the elderly? A comparison of robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in elderly ≥75 years old.

Authors:  Kyle A Richards; A Karim Kader; Rick Otto; Joseph A Pettus; John J Smith; Ashok K Hemal
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 2.942

View more
  3 in total

1.  Comparison of Safety and Efficacy of Percutaneous Microwave Ablation of Central Versus Peripheral Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Thomas J An; Ronald S Arellano
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  Evaluation of Functional Outcomes and Quality of Life in Elderly Patients (>75 y.o.) Undergoing Minimally Invasive Radical Cystectomy with Single Stoma Ureterocutaneostomy vs. Bricker Intracorporeal Ileal Conduit Urinary Diversion.

Authors:  Andrea Fuschi; Yazan Al Salhi; Manfredi Bruno Sequi; Gennaro Velotti; Alessia Martoccia; Paolo Pietro Suraci; Silvio Scalzo; Anastasios Asimakopoulos; Giorgio Bozzini; Alessandro Zucchi; Cosimo De Nunzio; Antonio Carbone; Antonio Luigi Pastore
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 4.241

3.  A Personalized Approach to Radical Cystectomy Can Decrease Its Complication Rates.

Authors:  Przemyslaw Adamczyk; Pawel Poblocki; Cyprian Michalik; Mateusz Kadlubowski; Jan Adamowicz; Witold Mikolajczak; Tomasz Drewa; Kajetan Juszczak
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-02-14
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.