Literature DB >> 33058384

Washington's liquor license system and alcohol-related adverse health outcomes.

Aryn Z Phillips1,2, Hector P Rodriguez1,3, William C Kerr4, Jennifer A Ahern3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In June 2012, Washington state (USA) implemented Initiative 1183, privatizing liquor sales. As a result, off-premises outlets increased from 330 to over 1400 and trading hours lengthened. Increased availability of liquor may lead to increased consumption. This study examines the impact of Initiative 1183 on alcohol-related adverse health outcomes, measured by inpatient hospitalizations for alcohol-related disorders and accidental injuries. It further assesses heterogeneity by urbanicity, because outlets increased most in metropolitan-urban areas.
DESIGN: County-by-quarter difference-in-difference linear regression models, estimated statewide and within metropolitan/rural strata. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Data are from AHRQ Healthcare Cost and Utilization State Inpatient Database 2010-2014 and HHS Area Health Resource File 2010-2014. Changes in the rates of hospitalizations in the 2.5 years following Initiative 1183 in Washington (n = 39 counties) are compared with changes in Oregon (n = 36 counties). MEASUREMENTS: County rates of hospitalizations per 1000 residents, including all records with any-listed ICD-9 Clinical Classification Software code denoting an alcohol-related disorder, and all records with any-listed external cause of injury code denoting an accidental injury.
FINDINGS: The increase in the rate of accidental injury hospitalizations in Washington's metropolitan-urban counties was on average 0.289 hospitalizations per 1000 county residents per quarter greater than the simultaneous increase observed in Oregon (P = 0.017). This result was robust to alternative specifications using a propensity score matched sample and synthetic control methods with data from other comparison states. The evidence did not suggest that Initiative 1183 was associated with differential changes in the rate of hospitalizations for alcohol-related disorders in metropolitan-urban (P = 0.941), non-metropolitan-urban (P = 0.162), or rural counties (P = 0.876).
CONCLUSIONS: Implementing Washington's Initiative 1183 (privatizing liquor sales) appears to have been associated with a significant increase in the rate of accidental injury hospitalizations in urban counties in that state but does not appear to be significantly associated with changes in the rate of hospitalizations specifically for alcohol-related disorders within 2.5 years. © 2020 Society for the Study of Addiction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accidental injuries; alcohol-related disorders; hospitalizations; liquor availability; privatization; state policy

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33058384      PMCID: PMC8043979          DOI: 10.1111/add.15234

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Addiction        ISSN: 0965-2140            Impact factor:   7.256


  50 in total

1.  Minimum alcohol prices and outlet densities in British Columbia, Canada: estimated impacts on alcohol-attributable hospital admissions.

Authors:  Tim Stockwell; Jinhui Zhao; Gina Martin; Scott Macdonald; Kate Vallance; Andrew Treno; William Ponicki; Andrew Tu; Jane Buxton
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Designing Difference in Difference Studies: Best Practices for Public Health Policy Research.

Authors:  Coady Wing; Kosali Simon; Ricardo A Bello-Gomez
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 21.981

3.  Relative risk of injury from acute alcohol consumption: modeling the dose-response relationship in emergency department data from 18 countries.

Authors:  Cheryl J Cherpitel; Yu Ye; Jason Bond; Guilherme Borges; Maristela Monteiro
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 6.526

4.  Relating off-premises alcohol outlet density to intentional and unintentional injuries.

Authors:  Christopher Morrison; Karen Smith; Paul J Gruenewald; William R Ponicki; Juliet P Lee; Peter Cameron
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 6.526

5.  Whose drinking does the liberalization of alcohol policy increase? Change in alcohol consumption by the initial level in the Finnish panel survey in 1968 and 1969.

Authors:  Pia Mäkelä
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 6.526

6.  Differentials and trends in emergency department visits due to alcohol intoxication and co-occurring conditions among students in a U.S. public university.

Authors:  Duc Anh Ngo; Nassima Ait-Daoud; Saumitra V Rege; Christopher Ding; Lauren Gallion; Susan Davis; Christopher P Holstege
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2017-12-09       Impact factor: 4.492

7.  Survey Estimates of Changes in Alcohol Use Patterns Following the 2012 Privatization of the Washington Liquor Monopoly.

Authors:  William C Kerr; Edwina Williams; Yu Ye; Meenakshi Sabina Subbaraman; Thomas K Greenfield
Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 2.826

Review 8.  Ethnicity and health disparities in alcohol research.

Authors:  Karen Chartier; Raul Caetano
Journal:  Alcohol Res Health       Date:  2010

9.  Absorption and peak blood alcohol concentration after drinking beer, wine, or spirits.

Authors:  Mack C Mitchell; Erin L Teigen; Vijay A Ramchandani
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 10.  The effects of prices on alcohol use and its consequences.

Authors:  Xin Xu; Frank J Chaloupka
Journal:  Alcohol Res Health       Date:  2011
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.