Literature DB >> 33058217

Discussing non-invasive prenatal testing on Reddit: The benefits, the concerns, and the comradery.

Alessandro R Marcon1, Vardit Ravitsky2, Timothy Caulfield1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: As the use of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) increases, its benefits and concerns are being examined through surveys, qualitative studies, and bioethical analysis. However, only scant research has examined public discourse on the topic. This research examined NIPT discussions on the social media platform Reddit.
METHOD: Content and qualitative description analysis was performed on 98 NIPT discussions (2682 comments), obtained by inputting "NIPT" into Reddit's search engine.
RESULTS: Detailing of benefits and concerns was found in collaborative and supportive discussions. Overall, NIPT is seen as valuable and desirable. Some concerns focused on cost-related barriers to access, anxiety related to testing, and interpretation of results. NIPT is often portrayed as offering peace of mind and is sometimes described as a means of preparing for possible outcomes.
CONCLUSION: In the discussions analyzed, NIPT is seen, overall, as valuable and greater access to it is desired. Some questions and concerns about NIPT were evident. Reddit stands as a valuable and appreciated tool for individuals wishing to discuss NIPT and to solicit and share information, opinions, and experiences. Health care providers should consider the ways social platforms such as Reddit can be engaged to better inform and educate the public.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33058217     DOI: 10.1002/pd.5841

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  3 in total

1.  Video education about genetic privacy and patient perspectives about sharing prenatal genetic data: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Christian M Parobek; Margaret M Thorsen; Phinnara Has; Paula Lorenzi; Melissa A Clark; Melissa L Russo; Adam K Lewkowitz
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 10.693

2.  What patients with eosinophilic esophagitis may not share with their providers: a qualitative assessment of online health communities.

Authors:  Joy W Chang; Vincent L Chen; Joel H Rubenstein; Evan S Dellon; Lauren P Wallner; Raymond De Vries
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 2.822

3.  The Optimal Cutoff Value of Z-scores Enhances the Judgment Accuracy of Noninvasive Prenatal Screening.

Authors:  Lingna Zhou; Bin Zhang; Jianbing Liu; Ye Shi; Jing Wang; Bin Yu
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 4.599

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.