Literature DB >> 33058208

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for respiratory distress in preterm infants.

Jacqueline J Ho1, Prema Subramaniam2, Peter G Davis3,4,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Respiratory distress, particularly respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), is the single most important cause of morbidity and mortality in preterm infants. In infants with progressive respiratory insufficiency, intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV) with surfactant has been the usual treatment, but it is invasive, potentially resulting in airway and lung injury. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) has been used for the prevention and treatment of respiratory distress, as well as for the prevention of apnoea, and in weaning from IPPV. Its use in the treatment of RDS might reduce the need for IPPV and its sequelae.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of continuous distending pressure in the form of CPAP on the need for IPPV and associated morbidity in spontaneously breathing preterm infants with respiratory distress. SEARCH
METHODS: We used the standard strategy of Cochrane Neonatal to search CENTRAL (2020, Issue 6); Ovid MEDLINE and Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Daily and Versions; and CINAHL on 30 June 2020. We also searched clinical trials databases and the reference lists of retrieved articles for randomised controlled trials and quasi-randomised trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised or quasi-randomised trials of preterm infants with respiratory distress were eligible. Interventions were CPAP by mask, nasal prong, nasopharyngeal tube or endotracheal tube, compared with spontaneous breathing with supplemental oxygen as necessary. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methods of Cochrane and its Neonatal Review Group, including independent assessment of risk of bias and extraction of data by two review authors. We used the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of evidence. Subgroup analyses were planned on the basis of birth weight (greater than or less than 1000 g or 1500 g), gestational age (groups divided at about 28 weeks and 32 weeks), timing of application (early versus late in the course of respiratory distress), pressure applied (high versus low) and trial setting (tertiary compared with non-tertiary hospitals; high income compared with low income) MAIN
RESULTS: We included five studies involving 322 infants; two studies used face mask CPAP, two studies used nasal CPAP and one study used endotracheal CPAP and continuing negative pressure for a small number of less ill babies. For this update, we included one new trial. CPAP was associated with lower risk of treatment failure (death or use of assisted ventilation) (typical risk ratio (RR) 0.64, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.50 to 0.82; typical risk difference (RD) -0.19, 95% CI -0.28 to -0.09; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 6, 95% CI 4 to 11; I2 = 50%; 5 studies, 322 infants; very low-certainty evidence), lower use of ventilatory assistance (typical RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.96; typical RD -0.13, 95% CI -0.25 to -0.02; NNTB 8, 95% CI 4 to 50; I2 = 55%; very low-certainty evidence) and lower overall mortality (typical RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.83; typical RD -0.11, 95% CI -0.18 to -0.04; NNTB 9, 95% CI 2 to 13; I2 = 0%; 5 studies, 322 infants; moderate-certainty evidence). CPAP was associated with increased risk of pneumothorax (typical RR 2.48, 95% CI 1.16 to 5.30; typical RD 0.09, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.16; number needed to treat for an additional harmful outcome (NNTH) 11, 95% CI 7 to 50; I2 = 0%; 4 studies, 274 infants; low-certainty evidence). There was no evidence of a difference in bronchopulmonary dysplasia, defined as oxygen dependency at 28 days (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.35 to 3.13; I2 = 0%; 2 studies, 209 infants; very low-certainty evidence). The trials did not report use of surfactant, intraventricular haemorrhage, retinopathy of prematurity, necrotising enterocolitis and neurodevelopment outcomes in childhood. AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: In preterm infants with respiratory distress, the application of CPAP is associated with reduced respiratory failure, use of mechanical ventilation and mortality and an increased rate of pneumothorax compared to spontaneous breathing with supplemental oxygen as necessary. Three out of five of these trials were conducted in the 1970s. Therefore, the applicability of these results to current practice is unclear. Further studies in resource-poor settings should be considered and research to determine the most appropriate pressure level needs to be considered.
Copyright © 2020 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33058208      PMCID: PMC8094155          DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002271.pub3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  42 in total

1.  Prophylactic or early selective surfactant combined with nCPAP in very preterm infants.

Authors:  Fabrizio Sandri; Richard Plavka; Gina Ancora; Umberto Simeoni; Zbynek Stranak; Stefano Martinelli; Fabio Mosca; José Nona; Merran Thomson; Henrik Verder; Laura Fabbri; Henry Halliday
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2010-05-03       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Noninvasive Respiratory Support.

Authors:  James J Cummings; Richard A Polin
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Pharyngeal pressure value using two continuous positive airway pressure devices.

Authors:  M Colnaghi; P G Matassa; M Fumagalli; D Messina; F Mosca
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2008-03-11       Impact factor: 5.747

4.  Treatment of the idiopathic respiratory-distress syndrome with continuous positive airway pressure.

Authors:  G A Gregory; J A Kitterman; R H Phibbs; W H Tooley; W K Hamilton
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1971-06-17       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Outcome after neonatal continuous negative-pressure ventilation: follow-up assessment.

Authors:  Katherine Telford; Lorraine Waters; Harish Vyas; Bradley N Manktelow; Elizabeth S Draper; Neil Marlow
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-04-01       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Early bubble CPAP and outcomes in ELBW preterm infants.

Authors:  Vivek Narendran; Edward F Donovan; Steven B Hoath; Henry T Akinbi; Jean J Steichen; Alan H Jobe
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2003 Apr-May       Impact factor: 2.521

Review 7.  Efficacy and safety of bubble CPAP in neonatal care in low and middle income countries: a systematic review.

Authors:  Simone Martin; Trevor Duke; Peter Davis
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 5.747

Review 8.  Early versus delayed initiation of continuous distending pressure for respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants.

Authors:  J J Ho; D J Henderson-Smart; P G Davis
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2002

9.  Evaluation of Initial Respiratory Support Strategies in VLBW Neonates with RDS.

Authors:  Seyyed Abolfazl Afjeh; Mohammad Kazem Sabzehei; Maryam Khoshnood Shariati; Ahmad Reza Shamshiri; Fatemeh Esmaili
Journal:  Arch Iran Med       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.354

Review 10.  Prophylactic nasal continuous positive airway pressure for preventing morbidity and mortality in very preterm infants.

Authors:  Prema Subramaniam; Jacqueline J Ho; Peter G Davis
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-06-14
View more
  9 in total

1.  Nonclinical Bench Performance Testing of a Very Low-Cost Nonelectric Bubble Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (bCPAP) and Blenders Device Designed for Newborn Respiratory Support.

Authors:  Patricia S Coffey; Alec Wollen
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2022-06-27

Review 2.  Prophylactic or very early initiation of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for preterm infants.

Authors:  Prema Subramaniam; Jacqueline J Ho; Peter G Davis
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-10-18

Review 3.  Indications for and Risks of Noninvasive Respiratory Support.

Authors:  Kirsten Glaser; Clyde J Wright
Journal:  Neonatology       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 4.035

4.  Respiratory Interventions for Preterm Infants in LMICs: A Prospective Study From Cape Town, South Africa.

Authors:  Ilse Lategan; Caris Price; Natasha Raygaan Rhoda; Heather J Zar; Lloyd Tooke
Journal:  Front Glob Womens Health       Date:  2022-04-06

Review 5.  Respiratory distress syndrome management in resource limited settings-Current evidence and opportunities in 2022.

Authors:  Osayame A Ekhaguere; Ikechukwu R Okonkwo; Maneesh Batra; Anna B Hedstrom
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 3.569

6.  Lowering of the Neonatal Lung Ultrasonography Score after nCPAP Positioning in Neonates over 32 Weeks of Gestational Age with Neonatal Respiratory Distress.

Authors:  Alessandro Perri; Simona Fattore; Vito D'Andrea; Annamaria Sbordone; Maria Letizia Patti; Stefano Nobile; Chiara Tirone; Lucia Giordano; Milena Tana; Francesca Priolo; Francesca Serrao; Riccardo Riccardi; Giorgia Prontera; Giovanni Vento
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-07

7.  Surfactant without Endotracheal Tube Intubation (SurE) versus Intubation-Surfactant-Extubation (InSurE) in Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Lirong Wang; Min Zhang; Qingfeng Yi
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 2.650

8.  RAM cannula with Cannulaide versus Hudson prongs for delivery of nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants: an RCT.

Authors:  Shravani Maram; Srinivas Murki; Sidharth Nayyar; Sandeep Kadam; Tejo Pratap Oleti; Rajendra Prasad Anne; Saikiran Deshobhotla; Deepak Sharma; Subhash Arun; Praveen Rao Vadije
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Update on ventilatory management of extremely preterm infants-A Neonatal Intensive Care Unit perspective.

Authors:  Sven M Schulzke; Benjamin Stoecklin
Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 2.129

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.