Literature DB >> 33058197

Fetal macrosomia in home and birth center births in the United States: Maternal, fetal, and newborn outcomes.

Sabrina Pillai1, Melissa Cheyney2, Courtney L Everson3, Marit L Bovbjerg1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fetal macrosomia is associated with negative outcomes, although less is known about how severities of macrosomia influence these outcomes. Planned community births in the United States have higher rates of gestational age-adjusted macrosomia than planned hospital births, providing a novel population to examine macrosomia morbidity.
METHODS: Maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with grade 1 (4000-4499 g), grade 2 (4500-4999 g), and grade 3 (≥5000 g) macrosomia were compared to normal birthweight newborns (2500-3999 g), using data from the MANA Statistics Project-a registry of planned community births, 2012-2018 (n = 68 966). Outcomes included perineal trauma, postpartum hemorrhage, cesarean birth, neonatal birth injury, shoulder dystocia, neonatal respiratory distress, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) stay >24 hours, and perinatal death. Logistic regressions controlled for parity and mode of birth, obesity, gestational diabetes, and preeclampsia.
RESULTS: Sixteen percent of the sample were grade 1 macrosomic, 3.3% were grade 2 macrosomic, and 0.4% were grade 3 macrosomic. Macrosomia grades 1-3 were associated in a dose-response fashion with higher odds of all outcomes, compared to non-macrosomia. The adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for postpartum hemorrhage for grade 1, grade 2, and grade 3 macrosomia vs normal birthweight were 1.75 (1.56-1.96), 2.12 (1.70-2.63), and 5.18 (3.47-7.74), respectively. Other outcomes had similar patterns. DISCUSSION: The adjusted odds of negative outcomes increase as grade of macrosomia increases in planned community births; results are comparable with the published literature. Pre-birth fetal weight estimation is imprecise; prenatal supports and shared decision-making processes should reflect these complexities.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  birthing centers; fetal macrosomia; home childbirth; pregnancy complications

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33058197      PMCID: PMC8923081          DOI: 10.1111/birt.12506

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth        ISSN: 0730-7659            Impact factor:   3.689


  19 in total

1.  Practitioner and Practice Characteristics of Certified Professional Midwives in the United States: Results of the 2011 North American Registry of Midwives Survey.

Authors:  Melissa Cheyney; Christine Olsen; Marit Bovbjerg; Courtney Everson; Ida Darragh; Brynne Potter
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 2.388

2.  Trends and state variations in out-of-hospital births in the United States, 2004-2017.

Authors:  Marian F MacDorman; Eugene Declercq
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 3.689

3.  Major Survey Findings of Listening to Mothers(SM) III: Pregnancy and Birth: Report of the Third National U.S. Survey of Women's Childbearing Experiences.

Authors:  Eugene R Declercq; Carol Sakala; Maureen P Corry; Sandra Applebaum; Ariel Herrlich
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2014

4.  Causal diagrams for epidemiologic research.

Authors:  S Greenland; J Pearl; J M Robins
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.822

5.  Outcomes of care for 16,924 planned home births in the United States: the Midwives Alliance of North America Statistics Project, 2004 to 2009.

Authors:  Melissa Cheyney; Marit Bovbjerg; Courtney Everson; Wendy Gordon; Darcy Hannibal; Saraswathi Vedam
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 2.388

6.  Macrosomic births in the united states: determinants, outcomes, and proposed grades of risk.

Authors:  Sheree L Boulet; Greg R Alexander; Hamisu M Salihu; MaryAnn Pass
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Fetal macrosomia: prediction, risks, proposed management.

Authors:  M E Boyd; R H Usher; F H McLean
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Births: Final Data for 2016.

Authors:  Joyce A Martin; Brady E Hamilton; Michelle J K Osterman; Anne K Driscoll; Patrick Drake
Journal:  Natl Vital Stat Rep       Date:  2018-01

9.  Mapping integration of midwives across the United States: Impact on access, equity, and outcomes.

Authors:  Saraswathi Vedam; Kathrin Stoll; Marian MacDorman; Eugene Declercq; Renee Cramer; Melissa Cheyney; Timothy Fisher; Emma Butt; Y Tony Yang; Holly Powell Kennedy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The role of gestational diabetes, pre-pregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain on the risk of newborn macrosomia: results from a prospective multicentre study.

Authors:  Salvatore Alberico; Marcella Montico; Valentina Barresi; Lorenzo Monasta; Caterina Businelli; Valentina Soini; Anna Erenbourg; Luca Ronfani; Gianpaolo Maso
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 3.007

View more
  2 in total

1.  Risk Factors for Macrosomia in Multipara: A Multi-Center Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Juan Juan; Yumei Wei; Geng Song; Rina Su; Xu Chen; Ruiqin Shan; Jianying Yan; Mei Xiao; Ying Li; Shihong Cui; Xianlan Zhao; Shangrong Fan; Ling Feng; Meihua Zhang; Yuyan Ma; Zishan You; Haixia Meng; Haiwei Liu; Jingxia Sun; Yan Cai; Kejia Hu; Huixia Yang
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-22

2.  Differential impact of antiretroviral therapy initiated before or during pregnancy on placenta pathology in HIV-positive women.

Authors:  Nadia M Ikumi; Thokozile R Malaba; Komala Pillay; Marta C Cohen; Hlengiwe P Madlala; Mushi Matjila; Dilly Anumba; Landon Myer; Marie-Louise Newell; Clive M Gray
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 4.177

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.